California Vaccine Mandates #SB277

Posted on June 22, 2015 by Becky Hastings

10 VACCINES SB277 WOULD REQUIRE:

1. Diphtheria – primarily a problem in overcrowded areas with poor sanitation. There was 1 case in the U.S in 2014. Vaccine possible side effects include seizures.http://www.cdc.gov/vacci…/vpd-vac/diphtheria/fs-parents.html
2. Hep B – primarily a sexually transmitted disease which is also spread through sharing of needles. Currently, children diagnosed with active hepatitis B are allowed to attend school, because they are not considered a risk to others, yet a child who does not have the disease will not be allowed to attend school without the vaccine.
http://www.pkids.org/files/11-01civilrights.pdf
3. HiB – Haemophulis Influenzae B. “Children over five years old and adults usually do not need Hib vaccine. But it may be recommended for older children or adults with asplenia (no spleen) or sickle-cell disease, before surgery to remove the spleen, or following a bone marrow transplant. It may also be recommended for people 5 to 18 years old with HIV. “ according to http://www.vaccines.gov/diseases/hib/
4,5,6. Measles, Mumps, Rubella – the vaccine commonly given in one shot is called the MMR. Side effects “may include high fever that could cause a seizure” according to http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/measles/fs-parents.html. According to the vaccine insert possible side effects include “Encephalitis; encephalopathy; measles inclusion body encephalitis (MIBE) (see CONTRAINDICATIONS); subacute sclerosing pan encephalitis (SSPE); Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS); acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM); transverse myelitis; febrile convulsions; afebrile convulsions or seizures; ataxia; polyneuritis; polyneuropathy; ocular palsies; paresthesia.”, “Nerve deafness; otitis media” and many more. http://www.merck.com/…/…/pi_circulars/m/mmr_ii/mmr_ii_pi.pdf
7. Pertussis – much controversy about this one but there does seem to be consensus about two things, the vaccine wears off quickly and “Even vaccinated people may still be carriers and spread whooping-cough without realizing it.” http://www.webmd.com/…/whooping-cough-rising-despite-new-va…
8. Poliomyelitis – according to CDC’s information, the polio vaccine, like any medicine, could cause serious problems, such as a severe allergic reaction or even death.” http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/side-effects.htm#polio. The “IPV induces very low levels of immunity in the intestine. As a result, when a person immunized with IPV is infected with wild poliovirus, the virus can still multiply inside the intestines and be shed in the faeces, risking continued circulation.” – See more at: http://www.polioeradication.org/…/Inactivatedpoliovaccine(I…
9. Tetanus – completely non transferable and vaccine carries the risk of seizures
10. Varicella – The vaccine targeting chicken pox, once a common childhood illness. Death rates from the disease were on decline prior to the introduction of the vaccine due to improved sanitation, nutrition and medical treatment. According to CDC “Some people who are vaccinated against chickenpox may still get the disease” http://www.cdc.gov/chickenpox/vaccination.html They go on to list some possible side effects: “Moderate problems
• Seizure (jerking or staring) caused by fever (very rare).
Severe problems
• Pneumonia (very rare)
Other serious problems, including severe brain reactions and low blood count, have been reported after chickenpox vaccination. “

In addition to those 10 vaccines, #SB277 makes an eleventh provision:

11. “Any other disease deemed appropriate by the department, taking into consideration the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Academy of Family Physicians.”

So we now all know that seizures are a moderate reaction to vaccines and the risk of death does exist with vaccines. We know that no vaccine is 100% effective, and therefore a vaccinated child can also obtain a disease and pass it on to others, sometimes asymptomatically from the vaccine itself.

Knowing all this and more how can we possibly think there is enough added protection from mandating the current vaccines to strip parents’ rights and force a product that has the potential for harm?

Author: Lyn E, vaccine truth activist

How many shots?

Posted on June 22, 2015 by Becky Hastings

49 shots by age 2

This is the average child’s vaccine record. Luca’s mom shared this “immunization record” of all the shots her precious baby received from birth to 24 months. She trusted her doctor and the US Medical system 100%. She grew up in Eastern Europe and many of her dreams came true when she arrived as an adult in the USA. She never suspected that maybe the U.S. vaccine recommendations could actually harm her child.

Here is another way of looking at those vaccines:

Born on 5 January 2010 baby Luca got his Hepatitis B shot in the hospital as standard procedure. No one ever asked or explained the risk or benefits of either Hepatitis or the Hep B injection.

At two months of age his mom dutifully took him back to the doctor where he received another Hepatitis B, DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis), HIB (Haemophilus influenza B) and IPV (polio); three needles and one oral dose for a total of six vaccine antigens. Luca’s mom said she hated the fact that Luca had to have shots. She couldn’t even hold him while they injected him, it was too traumatic for her. She cried at every doctor’s visit. But she continued to trust the doctor.

All those vaccines can take a toll on a two month old infant’s immune system. Of course the infant’s body must also deal with all the other vaccine ingredients like formaldehyde, aluminum, foreign protein cells, etc.

How could a two month old baby tell you if something about that combination wasn’t quite right for his body? He would cry of course, that is the only way a two month old baby can communicate – or he could possible go lethargic. But if baby cries – even inconsolably for hours – parents often call their doctor’s office and are told such crying is normal and to give Tylenol so baby will feel better. Many babies cry and are extremely fussy for days or weeks after vaccines. Some otherwise completely healthy babies, so overloaded by the toxins, simply don’t wake up. Their deaths are often labeled as SIDS.

Luca’s mom grew up in the politically volatile country of Serbia. She wanted a better life for her children. She had absolute trust in the U.S. because of such a stable government. She was extremely compliant with her doctor’s recommendations. She not only brought Luca for the 2, 4, and 6 month old vaccine visits, she also brought Luca in for the Pneumococcal vaccine at 3 months AND 5 months.

Luca’s next big round of vaccine assault was at four months: another DTaP, another HIB, and another IPV. Again, moms are told to expect crying and fussiness – after all, baby just had his shots. Sometimes moms, in anticipation of the normal reaction to vaccines (crying, miserable baby) give Tylenol BEFORE going to the doctor, trying to offset the reaction in advance. Luca’s mom felt ‘lucky’ because Luca didn’t have really bad reactions after receiving his shots; he just got quiet.

At six months Luca again received shots: Pentacel which is a ‘5 in one’ vaccine containing: DTaP, IPV, and HIB. With Pentacel baby only gets one needle so it seems to be less traumatic – from the onlooker’s point of view. Mom is still not comfortable with shots, but continues to have faith in the medical system and her doctor.

At ten months Luca got his third dose of Hepatitis B. The CDC recommends giving the third dose between 6 – 18 months. I don’t know exactly why baby Luca had another appointment for just one shot at 10 months. Perhaps his mom took him to visit the doctor for some other reason and when they saw he was due for his last Hepatitis B series, they gave it to him despite his illness. Many moms think giving a vaccine to a sick child is an extremely bad idea, but doctors just take it in stride. A cold or other illness is no reason for them to avoid administering a vaccine. They know that if they miss the opportunity to give a vaccine when baby is in their office, mom may not bring him back when he is well.

Baby Luca had been injected in the hospital at birth, and was back to his doctor for more shots at two, three, four, five, six, ten, twelve, fifteen, eighteen and twenty-four months. That is a lot of traumatic doctor’s visits by a very dutiful mom. Of course, there is a significant financial implication to all those office visits. It costs the parents money and brings financial benefits to the doctor.

While this seems like an incredible number of toxic shots to inject into a baby, the CDC actually recommends that babies get EVEN MORE. Baby Luca did not get the Rotavirus series of vaccines because for some unknown reason, his doctor did not suggest it was needed. He also did not get any flu vaccines because his mom declined those.

Notice Luca’s eyes in these two photographs. The first was taken at eleven months – before he received the MMRV. The picture on the right was taken ten days after receiving the MMRV. Notice his eyes. There is a distinct droop which is evidence of the micro ‘strokes’ caused by the vaccines.

Many times a baby’s body reacts to the cumulative impact of all the ingredients in the vaccines over time. The known neurotoxins, especially aluminum, impair brain function. Luca had received a lot of aluminum in all of those shots.

Here is a list of all the ingredients, provided by the CDC, that the vaccines injected into baby Luca contained. Remember that he was injected with multiple doses of many of the vaccines.

The latest scientific information gleaned on the development of the immune system continues to shed light on how amazing it is. Anyone wanting to understand how to keep a baby healthy needs to understand the neonatal immune system development. Many of the facts of the immune system, especially the gut/brain/immune system connection coming to light, turn the foundation of vaccine science on its head.[1]

Dr Suzanne Humprhies describes the natural state of the infant’s body as “anti-inflammatory”. This anti-inflammatory state is purposeful. An infant is not born deficit of vaccines. The complex mechanisms of the immune system gradually identify foreign substances and ‘learn’ to mount an appropriate response, but it takes time. Injecting and bombarding infants with intramuscular injections of inflammatory substances contained in vaccines, causes the infant to mount an inappropriate inflammatory condition – often with detrimental long-term impact. Many people suggest that we need “safe” vaccines. However, aluminum and other harmful additions to vaccines are done purposefully – called adjuvants – in an attempt to “wake up” or cause a more inflammatory reaction in the infant.

As a parent, Luca’s mom wanted the absolute best for her baby. She trusted that her doctor also wanted the best for her baby. She assumed that the CDC recommendations were in the best interests of HER baby. Regretfully she saw her son regress. She saw him having neurological challenges which forced her to begin to look into the science and ingredients in vaccines.

Luca experienced sensory processing challenges, muscle tone weakness, and ADD symptoms. His mom learned that the vaccines contain ingredients that can harm the developing brain and she saw her son struggling every single day with obvious vaccine injury. She began incurring huge expense in occupational therapy, physical therapy, speech therapy, nutritional therapy and other therapies to help Luca detox and heal from his vaccine injuries. He has made progress, but his mom lives daily with the guilt any parent feels when they realize they have unknowingly contributed to severely harming their baby. Luca’s mom also feels betrayed by a system built on a false foundation of vaccine safety. She is also angry because she trusted doctors and government agencies who perversely refuse to admit the harm daily experienced by thousands, if not millions of children. Anger of that level can be very challenging to deal with. She also experiences emotional and physical exhaustion in seeking to understand the harm Luca’s body was subjected to and find solutions that will benefit him.

How does Luca’s mom know vaccines harmed her baby?

She has had the opportunity of having another baby who is completely vaccine free. At every stage of development the difference in the babies progress is overwhelmingly obvious. Luca’s mom rejoices in the blessing of her new precious baby, but every day is a reminder that her first baby was deprived of a natural normal healthy development.

Luca’s mom has decided she wants to use her anger and betrayal as a stimulus to educate and inform other parents. At first, she was eager to save every single child from vaccine harm. She is actively involved in encouraging and educating parents on the reality of vaccine injury.

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate about Jesus, health and truth. If my writing can help even one baby avoid vaccine injury that will be a great victory. I pray it will effectively help many more.

More info on Vaccines: 30 Ways in 30 Days to Explore Vaccines

[1] Dr Suzanne Humphries provides a brilliant explanation of how exactly the infant immune system develops based on the latest scientific discoveries. Dr. Suzanne Humphries – Neonatal Immunity: The First Three Years Pt 1

My Dear Friend – it’s about vaccines

Posted on June 2, 2015 by Becky Hastings

I sent this letter to a friend after she told me she would be taking her 8-week-old baby for his doctor’s visit in two days time. My first thought was about the vaccines they would want to give. I was able to pray for her just before her baby was born after sharing some information on the critical role of a woman’s brain function during labor. She decided to decline the epidural and managed to deliver her 9 lb 7 oz (4.28 kg) baby in less than 5 hours completely naturally!! She is very tiny herself, so was still deservedly thrilled and feeling empowered 8 weeks later. She thanked me profusely for our chat before her labor and felt it was providential. Me too. 😉

I decided I could not stay silent on the topic of vaccines and needed to share my concerns with her, trying my best not to be overbearing or offensive. This is what I sent to her, and Her response to my bold letter is at the end.

Dear friend,

I’m so glad you shared your birth story with me. It encouraged me a lot. I wish every woman could have a similarly positive birth experience. Unfortunately, in my experience it seems far too rare. I would love to be a champion of natural births and would appreciate any opportunity to pray with other pregnant moms.

I’m also passionate about healthy babies and I’ve been researching routine medical procedures for babies for about 33 years. I’ve watched the number of vaccines recommended for babies jump from around 3 when I was a kid to over 30 shots now recommended for ALL babies by 18 months, 49 by preschool, and a total of 69 doses by the time they are 18 years.

This is crazy and could be causing a lot of harm both immediate (SIDS) and long-term. And it’s not just autism or neurological damage, there are a host of auto-immune and health issues that this practice has created in children (from diabetes, allergies, skin conditions, etc.).

You may think I’m crazy, and your doctor may say that people like me are crazy, but I’ve encountered thousands upon thousands of parents who followed the CDC and their doctors’ recommendations regarding vaccines, only to witness first hand their child experience a devastating vaccine injury.

My strong encouragement to you as you approach your precious baby’s 2 month visit is to decline all shots until you have a chance to research this topic further. I have no idea how your doctor views vaccines. Many doctors have started personal research into the dangers, and are surprised by the lack of safety studies. This pushes them to find out the facts and science. The entire vaccine schedule has never been tested for safety in a true evidence-based manner. If your doctor says there are studies to show the schedule of giving 30+ doses of 14 vaccines to babies by the age of 18 months has been tested – ask him for the reference, I’d love to read it.

The problem is that most doctors receive very little training in the science behind vaccines in medical school or on an ongoing basis. They are told over and over again “Vaccines are safe and effective and if we didn’t have them we would see massive infectious disease epidemics. So you MUST tell your patients to get their babies vaccinated.” Most of their training comes directly from the pharmaceutical companies that manufacture and promote the vaccines. The training is often specifically focussed on “persuading” parents to give vaccines – not to provide information on the science supporting vaccines. These companies are making a lot of money (it’s a $30B+ per year business) and have a spotty track record in terms of safety. The CDC has become “captive” to these companies and has done a lot of unethical maneuvers to maintain their stance in support of high vaccine rates (see further #CDCWhistleblower). Doctors and scientists supporting vaccines are often so enmeshed in the premise that “vaccines are good and have saved the world” that they are not able to critically look at the science and ask hard questions. Their careers and livelihood depend on their unwavering commitment to their vaccine agenda.

But the science does not support their claims.

In the end you, as the parents, will be solely responsible for your baby’s health. If your baby is injured in any way through a vaccine (which may only become apparent later) the vaccine manufacturer, the CDC, and your doctor all have 100% protection from liability. The parent is the one who will bear the burden of all medical costs and trauma from such an injury. And the costs can be ENORMOUS. Mostly the doctors and others will deny even very obvious vaccine injury so the parents receive a double blow – first the injury, then victimization from a system that refuses to acknowledge the harm it is causing.

There is good news in that thousands of families are finding healing from vaccine injury through biomedical interventions, but this process is expensive, long, and difficult. It does, however, prove that there is indeed a physical link between the child’s injury symptoms and the vaccine, and that when the physical impact is appropriately addressed with understanding the toxic damage caused by vaccines, some healing can occur.

I’m sorry to be so long. I get really passionate about this. Please pray and research. I can give you many resources to help you in your discovery. I know you only want the best for your precious baby. Sometimes it is hard to discern what the best is because there are powerful deceptive forces pushing the acceptance of vaccines. Hanging in the balance is a HUGE amount of money, many careers, medical reputations, and the health of the individual child. The media does not give a balanced representation and often portrays those who speak of the dangers of the vaccine policy as crazy, quacks, etc. The media derives approximately 75% of its advertising revenue from pharmaceutical interests.

I’m boldly sharing this with you because I care and my heart would break if your baby suffered any damage from vaccines purported to “protect”, when in reality, they hurt far too many babies. The rate of injury is not “very rare”, as many doctors like to tell their patients. I’ve connected with thousands of parents who personally witnessed injuries. They believed the recommendations that vaccines were in the best interests of their baby, they trusted the doctor’s advice, and they dutifully took their babies for their shots. There are many many dangerous ingredients in vaccines and not enough science to discover how they impact such tiny vulnerable bodies. Parents deserve to know the true risk of ALL medical procedures – including routine vaccines.

Breastmilk is truly the absolute best vaccine any baby ever needs. Your milk is a living substance, which is perfectly designed by God to offer protection from illness, epigenetic enhancement of your baby’s immune system, and nutrition in exactly the form he needs.

Blessings and love to you!

Becky

Hallelujah, this was her response:

Dear Becky,

You sent this at the perfect time. I’ve been praying for wisdom and discernment in how to handle the issue of vaccinations for baby as his 2 month appointment is approaching quickly. I haven’t felt a peace about vaccines, but to be honest, I haven’t fully researched the topic. I’ve read enough to be alarmed and feel unsettled about the whole thing.

I really feel like God used you today in sending this message when you did. It really served as the encouragement we needed and hubby and I have decided to hold off on any shots to give ourselves more time to research further. Baby’s wellness is too important to make a flippant decision that we don’t feel at peace about.

I would love any resources you can send my way about this topic.

Thanks so much for reaching out! It came at the perfect time!

Written by Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate Jesus follower, breastfeeding counselor, crazy about health.

Please let me know how you feel about vaccines in the comments below!

Liar Liar Pants on Fire

Posted on May 24, 2015 by Becky Hastings

There are many kinds of people in the world. Perhaps they could be divided into 3 broad categories:

those who never knowingly lie;
those who lie occasionally;
those who deliberately lie;
those who perpetuate a lie because while they actually fall into category 1 above, they have believed a lie from someone who falls into category 3.

Human nature often encourages slight alterations of the truth. We want to present ourselves well. Sometimes we are not even aware that we are communicating a lie.

However, I want to focus on how to recognize those who fall into category 3. In my life I haven’t really encountered too many of this type, but as I am seeking to know and understand TRUTH in a broad range of topics, it is becoming increasingly clear that there are people who are purposefully and knowingly perpetuating lies for some motive which is not always apparent.

History is a great place to discover many lies, but it takes tenacity and digging for real evidence, to understand that some of the short paragraphs in our history books are actually more false than true.

For some time in the US we have been conditioned by our culture to believe what we are told, not to think for ourselves, and to accept the messages given by authorities without question. Dr John Taylor Gatto, a New York Teacher of the Year with over 30 years of experience, wrote about this in Dumbing Us Down: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling, which was first printed in 1991 and updated in 2002.[1]

At one time I thought spies and counter intelligence agents were purely fiction. When watching episodes of Chuck with my children, I never dreamed there were real people in the real world in similar operations, but unlike Chuck and Sara, they did not have good intentions, a good conscience, or seek to do the ‘right’ thing.

There are currently government psyops seeking to impact the way you and I think. A psyop is short for “psychological operation”. The people who are given the task of implementing such operations are often referred to as an OP, or operative.

There are some general characteristics of OPs that can help us to analyze information we receive to protect us from getting duped – and thus falling into category 4 above. OPs often do a great job of fitting in, looking normal, and appearing to have the same goals and purposes of the group which they infiltrate. They often seem like ‘the most trusted individuals of all.’

Some questions are too important to get wrong. It seems the number one point to remember is – Question everything and everyone.

If there are people in our country capable of perpetuating a great lie on the entire population, you can be sure that they are also capable of mounting a significant ‘disinformation movement’ in order to lead those who might discover the lie, down a different path – a path of their own making. It is an ALTERNATIVE path, but not a path to the real TRUTH.

Thus, in the maze of alternative information sources we must be careful to question. Just because someone labels himself or herself “alternative” does not always guarantee they are a truth seeker and truth proclaimer.

To be fair, some in the alternative media might be proclaiming lies – unknowingly – as in category 4.

Dr Judy Wood shares an important list of points to consider when evaluating information and seeking to know ‘who can I trust?'[2] This list can help provide discernment to discover if a person’s intent is to mislead, confuse, and divide. Disinformation specialists do not announce their intentions. They try to gain trust and get people to accept their ideas, then subtly lead them astray or cause a breakdown in an effective group. Even if you don’t claim to be a follower of Jesus, you can certainly see the truth of His words to his followers: “Beware of false prophets, they come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inside are ferocious wolves.”[3]

Does this person encourage me to think my own thoughts or do they want to pressure me to accept their thoughts as my opinion?
Does this person support and encourage me to continue working independently or do they try to impede my research efforts?
Does this person share facts and documented evidence or attack those with a different point of view?
Does this person respect me if our opinions differ? Can they tolerate independent thought? Can we rationally discuss ideas when we differ?
Does this person have any financial or career links to the points they are making?
Do they resort to authority? “I’m a nurse” or “I’m a doctor” or “listen to a doctor”

Discussion in the field of vaccine research can be highly emotive. Many parents at one time were in category 4. They were lied to. They believed a lie. They believed vaccines were safe and effective, only to find they weren’t – at least in the case of their own child. They live with the pain of that decision every day of their lives as they deal with vaccine injury. To be fair, maybe their doctor also fell into category 4 – he also thought vaccines were safe and effective. However, doctors have been so conditioned, have been lied to and participated in the lie for so long, that they have a very hard time ever admitting vaccine injury – even when it is right in front of them with a patient collapsing with seizures after a vaccine or not able to walk or talk after a round of ‘boosters.’

Our own personal health and safety is up to us. Strong forces stand to benefit more when we accept everything we are told by those in authority. They don’t want us to question for ourselves. That should be a big red flag in and of itself.

I wish strength and health to you and your family in your search for truth. I hope my writing might be a means of facilitating questioning and truth seeking. If you have always assumed there was a rock solid case for vaccine safety, I encourage you to seek to understand your advisor well. What are the motives or the financial ties of those who are giving your information? Don’t fall prey to the blind leading the blind.[4] If you plan on giving some vaccines please read this first. Blessings.

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, and truth seeker with a passion for health, joy and Jesus Christ.

[1] John Taylor Gatto, Dumbing Us Down. 2001

[2] This is part of a list developed by Dr Judy Wood, How to Recognize an OP (Operative) from her extensive search for truth in the 911 maze of information and disinformation.

[3] Matthew 7:15

[4] Luke 6:39 (ESV) “[Jesus] also told them a parable: “Can a blind man lead a blind man? Will they not both fall into a pit?'”

Vaccine Risks vs Benefits

Posted on May 15, 2015 by Becky Hastings

If you are considering following the CDC recommended vaccination schedule for your baby or child, here are some facts you should make sure you know and understand:

I understand that the pharmaceutical company who made this vaccine has NO liability in the event of a “bad” batch, or any severe reaction my child might have.
I understand that I pay a $0.75 Federal Excise Tax per vaccine, which is used to pay  vaccine injured families through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) created by the US government in 1986.[1]
I understand that $3.5 billion has been paid out for proven and admitted vaccine injury through the NVICP.
I understand that this vaccine contains neurotoxins such as aluminum that far exceeds “safe levels” deemed by the EPA for IV products.
I understand that this vaccine contains carcinogenic ingredients.
I understand that this vaccine could have been formulated and developed using aborted fetal cell lines.
I understand that getting this vaccine does not ensure that my child will be protected from the disease.
I understand that my child could get the very disease s/he was vaccinated for.
I understand that my child could be a carrier of the disease s/he was vaccinated for and spread it either through viral “shedding” or asymptomatic illness for up to six weeks.
I understand that my doctor may receive monetary rewards or face other pressure to have a high percentage of his/her patients fully vaccinated.
I understand that if a vaccine injures my child, my doctor would have to spend time filling out paper work in order to report it through Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).[2]
I understand that my doctor has no incentive to fill out paperwork for a vaccine injury.
I understand that while some doctors are aware of vaccine injury, doctors are mostly trained and encouraged to deny vaccine injury.[3]
I understand that vaccine injury is under-reported.
I understand that vaccine mandates (like California Senate Bill 277) remove all exemptions except rarely received medical and are strongly pushed by pharmaceutical interests, despite a vaccine rate of 97.46%.[4]
I understand that pharmaceutical companies have no incentive to make their product better or safer.
I understand that pharmaceutical companies spend up to four times more on advertising than they do on research.
I understand that corporate media gets 70% of their advertising revenue from pharmaceutical companies.
I understand that corporate media does not want to lose revenue, certainly not 70% of it.
I understand that when pharmaceutical companies conduct a study (on their own product) it is in their best interest to have a favorable outcome. Their studies are designed to show only positive results.[5]
I understand that the entire vaccine schedule has never been tested on children in an objective scientific manner.
I understand that this vaccine is known to cause injury or death, and my child could be one of the “rare” statistics.
My doctor has informed me on all the risks and side effects and has reviewed the vaccine insert – not the CDC information sheet – with me.[6]
I understand that if my child dies from this vaccine I will be awarded no more than $250,000, if my claim is proven to be vaccine related, a process that could take over 2 years.
I understand that a specific subset of the population is at greater risk for vaccine injury and that chromosomal tests can confirm my MTHFR gene status and help determine the vaccine compatibility of my child. [7][8]
I understand that if my baby/child/adult is sick, has a fever, or has been sick or feverish in the past 48 hours, he might be at an increased risk for an adverse reaction. The CDC states is usually no reason to avoid vaccination even when sick, but parents report vaccine injury associated with vaccines given during illness.
I understand that using Tylenol around same time as receiving a vaccine will substantially decrease my child’s level of the chemical glutathione which is essential to process (detox) the adjuvants contained in vaccines, i.e. aluminum, DNA fragments, bacteria, thimerosal, and other ingredients. Therefore, I understand that giving Tylenol before or after a vaccine can greatly increase my child’s chance of a serious vaccine injury.[9]
I am making an informed choice to vaccinate my child.

Now that is what I would consider truly INFORMED CONSENT. Remember, every parent who has experienced a vaccine injury with their child, vaccinated. They thought they were doing their best as parents to protect their child. Now they live with the damage and regret.

Compiled by Becky Hastings, with a lot of help from anonymous friends, who are parents and grandparents. Together we are passionate about telling the true story of the high level of vaccine injury so parents can make informed choices.

[1] US Department of Health & Human Services, National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, Frequently Asked Questions http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/faq.html

[2] Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, Report an Adverse Event https://vaers.hhs.gov/esub/index

[3]Dr. Suzanne Humphries Lecture on vaccines and health. Dr. Suzanne Humphries speaks on her background and about how she started to question the safety on vaccines. She also gives information about how authorities work to persuade people to vaccinate.

[4] California Coalition for Vaccine Choice, http://www.sb277.org

[5] Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals, Richard Smith, J R Soc Med, v.99(4); 2006 Apr, PMC1420798 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/

[6] Typical vaccine insert. Not generally provided unless asked for. Available to review on-line for each vaccine.

[7] Adversomics: The Emerging Field of Vaccine Adverse Event Immunogenetics, Gregory A. Poland, MD, Inna G. Ovsyannikova, PhD, and Robert M. Jacobson, MD, Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 May; 28(5): 431–432. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2843136/

[8] 23 and Me DNA testing service. Find out what your DNA says about you and your family. https://www.23andme.com

[9] McNeil Healthcare (Ireland) Ltd, “Metabolism and elimination of paracetamol: The plasma half-life of paracetamol after therapeutic doses is in the range 1.5-2.5 hours. Paracetamol is metabolised by the liver and several metabolites of paracetamol have been identified in man. The two major metabolites excreted in the urine are the glucuronide and sulphate conjugates. About 10% of administered paracetamol is converted, via a minor pathway, by a cytochrome P-450 mixed function oxidase system to a reactive metabolite, acetamidoquinone. This metabolite is rapidly conjugated with reduced glutathione and excreted as cysteine and mercapturic acid conjugates. When large amounts of paracetamol are taken, hepatic glutathione may become depleted causing excessive accumulation within the hepatocyte of acetamidoquinone, which binds covalently to vital hepatocellular macromolecules.” http://www.medicines.ie/medicine/1240/SPC/Calpol+Six+Plus+Suspension/

Vitamin K links

Posted on May 15, 2015 by Becky Hastings

Vitamin K

Is an injection that has been given routinely at birth in the USA since the 1970s. The reason given for this practice, is to prevent inter-cranial hemorrhage because infants are born with a low coagulation ability.

Is it worth it?

Vitamin K to newborns. Dr Suzanne Humphries provides an informed scientific opinion having thoroughly researched all sides on the subject of vitamin K and inter-cranial hemorrhage risk. It’s important to understand the impact of medical interventions at birth. In this video presentation Dr. Suzanne Humphries speaks on giving vitamin K to newborns. There is a reason why newborns don’t have a full coagulation; nature didn’t make a “mistake”.

Merck Pharmaceutical Warnings on Vitamin K http://web.archive.org/web/20070213093306/http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/SAFETY/2003/03Feb_PI/AquaMEPHYTON_PI.pdf

Insert and information and yes it can be given orally http://www.drugs.com/cons/aquamephyton.html (see ingredients for phenol, propylene glycol and acetic acid…toxic chemicals in Vitamin K shot)

Vitamin K: a flaw in the blueprint? Sara Wickham, article first published 2001 Midwifery Today, 2000; 56:39-41. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11984901or https://sarawickham.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/a1-vitamin-k-a-flaw-in-the-blueprint2.pdf

Vitamin K The Reasons for It http://vaccinefreehealth.blogspot.com/2011/04/vitamin-k-shot-why-is-it-given.html

Does Your Baby Really Need It http://www.vaccineriskawareness.com/Vitamin-K-Does-Your-Baby-Really-Need-It–

Vitamin K- To Inject or Not, Dr Ben Kim http://drbenkim.com/vitamin-K-shot-baby.html

The deadly effects of synthetic vitamin K http://www.naturalnews.com/036954_vitamin_k_newborns_injections.html

Vitamin K Deficiency Bleeding – Does it really exist http://www.maternity.org.nz/pdfs/VITAMIN%20K%20DEFICIENCY%20BLEEDING.pdf

Vitamin K – Controversy? What Controversy? http://www.vaclib.org/basic/vitamin-k.htm

A % of patients receiving K shot have had anaphylactoid responses with some deaths http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1011237019082

In some cases Vitamin K is not enough to stop bleeding http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs002770050314

Vitamin K – Why is it Given http://vaccinefreehealth.blogspot.com/2011/04/vitamin-k-shot-why-is-it-given.html

Vitamin K – The Controversy Reignites http://pathwaystofamilywellness.org/Holistic-Healthcare/the-controversy-reignites.html

More on Vitamin K http://www.vaccination.inoz.com/VitaminK.html

Evidence for Vitamin K Shot in Newborns http://evidencebasedbirth.com/evidence-for-the-vitamin-k-shot-in-newborns/

Video Who is at Risk for Vitamin K Deficiency Bleeding? from Evidence Based Birth

Peanut Allergies from Vaccines, The Doctor Within.

Peanut Oil Used in Manufacturing of the Vitamin K Shot by Barb Feick

Eat Foods High in Vitamin K to give your baby good levels without the shot. A list: http://www.coumadin.com/pdf/Foods_With_VitaminK.pdf

10 Decisions for Parents of Newborns by Keeper of the Home (See point #7)

Commonsense approach to the Synthetic Vitamin K Shot by Megan Heimer, Living Whole.

Vaccines and Childhood Cancer?

Posted on May 12, 2015 by Becky Hastings

This year, 2015, about 1,250 children younger than 15 years old are expected to die from cancer. Cancer is the second leading cause of death in children (after accidents).[1]

This year another 10,380 children in the United States under the age of 15 will be diagnosed with cancer for the first time. Childhood cancer rates have been rising for the past few decades.[2]

Children are recommended to receive 49 doses of vaccines by age 6 and 69 by 18. NONE of these vaccines routinely injected into children, or the combination of all of these vaccines, has ever been tested for carcinogenicity – the ability to cause cancer.

Orthodox medicine, your doctor, the CDC, and all others who encourage the injection of vaccines HAVE NO IDEA IF VACCINES ARE CARCINOGENIC OR NOT because vaccines are not tested for their ability to cause cancer, nor are there studies following the incidence of cancer among vaccinated versus non vaccinated children.

No one has proof that vaccines ARE NOT carcinogenic. The studies have not been done. You can read the information on each vaccine for yourself. The vaccine inserts clearly state that vaccines have not been studied for carcinogenicity.[3]

In fact, vaccines have NEVER been tested for their

carcinogenic (cancer causing) properties,
mutagenic (mutation causing) properties, or
teratogenic (developmental malformation causing) potential.

Not a single vaccine has been tested or studied for any of these properties. Can these chemicals that are injected into healthy children cause cancer? The people manufacturing the vaccines (the drug companies) and the bureaucrats mandating the drugs can’t say NO, because no studies have ever been conducted.

Doctors who promote vaccines such as Dr Pan (pictured on right), a California Senator currently pushing strongly to increase vaccine rates for children attending school through his bill #SB277 which intends to remove all but medical exemptions for children attending school, has repeatedly and categorically stated “vaccines are very safe and very effective.” Yet, he doesn’t know if these same vaccines, and these 49 vaccines given in combination to a child by the time he goes to school, might somehow trigger cancer – because no studies have ever been conducted to examine that potential.

In summary, federal and state governments are mandating that infants and children swallow and be injected with substances that have never been tested for their ability to cause cancer, mutations or developmental malformations. In the meantime, the drug companies are grossing billions of dollars on sales of these potentially carcinogenic products.

Further, vaccine manufacturers have no incentive to further study the safety of their products because they have been absolved of all liability for these products. They are protected from responsibility for any harm or any danger their vaccine may cause. If a child develops a serious immediate reaction to a vaccine, or a long-term condition like cancer as a result of one vaccine, or the total combination of all the vaccines, the manufacturer bears no financial liability.

CONCLUSIONS ON VACCINES & CANCER from a serious vaccine and childhood cancer researcher:

I am not suggesting that vaccination always leads to cancer. What I am suggesting is that in the same way vaccination can lead to encephalitis (damage of brain tissue) it can also, in some cases, lead to cancer.

Why does one child become autistic from the vaccine and another gets Crohn’s disease? Why does one child get Guillian-Barre Syndrome from a vaccination and another die of SIDS? Why does one child get reoccurring seizures and the other cancer?

How many other viruses is that child carrying? What other latent or hidden infections do they have? How strong is their immune system? How many vaccines can an infant handle before some invisible threshold has been crossed and the body becomes sick?

Alexander got 16 vaccinations from the age of 2 months to 17 months old. My grandparents got one childhood vaccine and they are both alive today. My parents, both born in 1937, got a total of two vaccines up to 17 months old. According to my vaccination booklet (my parents kept wonderful records) I was vaccinated only seven times before I reached 17 months. In fact, my first vaccine came at the age of 5 months, not two months like Alexander.

Every new childhood vaccine that is introduced means more profits for the drug companies so there is a tremendous incentive to keep adding more and more. Alexander got vaccinated against chicken-pox, a “disease” that kept our generation at home from school for one week. Do we really need a vaccine against chicken-pox? The drug companies will answer “yes.”[4]

So I will ask the question again: Is the current vaccine schedule the cause of the rise of childhood cancers? How many vaccines can an infant handle before some invisible threshold has been crossed and the body becomes sick? Why are we not actively studying the possible association between vaccines and childhood cancers?

The most powerful doctors in America are those affiliated with drug companies. The influence of the drug companies is so complete and profound that the agenda of the drug manufacturers has become the agenda of mainstream medicine and the U.S. government.[4]

Who is looking out for the health and wellbeing of our children?

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus Christ and truth seeker, especially in the areas of health and children. Facing a world quite different from the one in which I grew up, I seek to research and understand the true route to health, freedom and joyful family living!

[1] What are the key statistics for childhood cancer? American Cancer Society, Last Revised: 01/13/2015.
[2] ibid
[3] Vaccine Manufacturer’s Vaccine inserts collected for your convenience by Vactruth.com.
[4] Letter in Support of Congressional Hearing on Vaccines

Vaccines & DNA

Posted on April 28, 2015 by Becky Hastings

My heart is heavy as I write this. I do not claim to have all the answers. I know there are better ways to express this information, and I’m sure many of the facts could be refined to be more precisely accurate. However, the foundation of these facts is undisputed. I’d love ideas for how to better express them.

Is our current schedule of vaccines containing animal DNA and residual virus particles a risk for our very survival?

Vaccines are known to contain foreign cell proteins in a variety of forms from aborted human fetal cell fragments to monkeys, pigs, dogs[1], insects[2], guinea pigs, cows, chicks, eagles and more. Every vaccine can contain a variety of these foreign proteins, DNA fragments and accompanying viruses known to infect these animals.[3]

Animals and animal cells have been used in creating vaccines from the earliest efforts to “protect” the population from infectious disease. There have always been residual amounts of these cells that are being injected intramuscularly into the body with every vaccine given.

What impact does injecting foreign proteins, DNA and virus have?

Close contact with animals has been known to cause transfer of viruses specific to animal populations to humans.[4] One concern (and there are many others) is that injecting these foreign animal cells, known to be vehicles for retroviruses particular to those animals, has a much broader impact on human health than has been recognized. Simian virus 40 (SV40) is a commonly known retro virus from monkey kidney cells. The n

Most people by now have probably heard of SV40 which came from rhesus monkeys that were used to grow the polio virus cells in the late 1950s in the process of vaccine manufacture. The CDC admitted that polio vaccines given in the early 1960s were contaminated with this virus and the impact is becoming more apparent as the millions of people injected is aging and experiencing specific cancers associated with SV40. Lab analysis of brain and other tumors confirms the presence of SV40.[6]

SV40 has also been found in the tumors of children with cancer today, although the vaccine has not been used for 40 years or so. How is this possible?

Either there is still residual SV40 in current vaccines, or these viruses have changed the human genome and have been passed from their mothers.

RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) is now a serious risk for infection for babies. It is actually, Simian Coryza Virus, a virus common to monkeys which was renamed. It is a new viral risk for human children, unknown previously.

Is the animal DNA we have injected into our bodies, and that is being injected into our babies, negatively impacting our optimal health?

Keep in mind it has taken 50 years for scientists working in this field to realize (or admit) that these viruses are here and that they are causing sickness and cancer now. How long will it take to realize that the current contaminated vaccines have infected the human race?

There are many important questions raised, yet it is so taboo to ask questions regarding the vaccines recommended by the CDC that all scientific discourse is shut down. Has our vaccine program become the sacred cow? Are scientists, medical professionals and thinkers confined to staying in one paradigm in understanding this topic?

Can we release our infatuation with the idea of vaccines long enough to examine the true evidence and follow the science until we find answers to these important questions? Have we been ensnared by a lie?

However difficult, we need to have these discussions, especially in the Christian community.

Author: Becky Hastings, a truth seeking, ardent Christ following, wife, mother and grandmother, passionate to help the next generation raise healthy offspring for the glory of God.

___________________

[1] CDC: Cell-Based Flu Vaccines

[2] Insect cell technology is a versatile and robust vaccine manufacturing platform.

[3] You can examine the CDCs own list of ingredients and excipients, noticing these words: Bovine Extract, Bovine Serum Albumin, Fetal Bovine Serum, Calf Serum Protein, Egg Protein, Egg Albumin, Chick Kidney Cells, Monkey Kidney Tissue, Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium, Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK), Porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV-1), Human Serum Albumin, MRC 5 DNA and Cellular Protein (human fetal cells, WI-38 human diploid lung fibroblasts, and DNA. Complete list of all ingredients and excipients in vaccines from CDC.

[4] Viruses Transmissible From Laboratory Animals to Man, J. O’H. TOBIN, Lab. Anim. (1968) 2, 19-28.h, Public Health Laboratory, Withington Hospital, Manchester, 20. Downloaded from lan.sagepub.com on April 28, 2015

[5] Simian Virus 40 (SV40): A Cancer Causing Monkey Virus from FDA-Approved Vaccines

[6] Simian Virus 40 and Human Disease

Our Children, Our Future

Posted on April 10, 2015 by Becky Hastings

Our children are absolutely our most precious possession. Not that we own them, but we have been entrusted by God with their care. Their life and health is in our hands. They are precious. We owe it to our children to get the facts about vaccines. We are bombarded by sound bites in the media. What is the truth?

Much of the information in this blog was gleaned from the powerful presentation by Dr Russell Blaylock, retired neurosurgeon, which I have included below. Dr Blaylock has dissected every bit of science related to the vaccine questions for many years and is highly qualified to describe the function of vaccines on the human body, particularly the brain. You can read his full biography.[1]

Vaccine ‘science’ that promotes vaccines to the medical community and the public is a sector based on collective lies, false data and misunderstanding. As the scientific understanding of the exact nature of the function of the immune system has developed, the early understanding of how vaccines were thought to work has been turned on its head. Enough evidence is available today to expose the entire false foundation of vaccine ‘science.’

At one time doctors recommended smoking – even for pregnant women. Advertising abounded as the media extolled the virtues of cigarettes.[3] In our lifetime we have seen medical understanding change in many different areas.

A similar phenomenon has happened in many other areas of medicine. At one time it was thought that bleeding a patient was beneficial. Leeches were sometimes used. It was the treatment that George Washington received just before his death.[2]

Today Dr Semmelweis (1818-1865) is considered the “savior of mothers” in Vienna, Austria, but he was ignored and scorned among his medical colleagues because he recommended hand washing. He observed a correlation between women who died as a result of sepsis after childbirth and the doctors and students who attended them. He deduced that not washing their hands after working on cadavers was the cause of childbed fever and showed that hand washing saves women’s lives. Today he is honored as the father of infection control and scientists recognize the clear facts and results of his scientifically valid studies, but his colleagues rejected him and his theory and he died prematurely in an insane asylum without recognition.[4]

Despite hundreds of scientific studies showing the harm caused by vaccines, the recommendations of the pro vaccine voices continue to repeat “vaccines are safe and effective.”[5] The field of vaccine research remains sacrosanct. At the time of the widely promoted polio vaccine in the early 1960s it was recommended for children – not babies, but children – to get a total of three or four vaccines. Since then, an incredible number of vaccines has been added to the recommended list by the CDC in a most cavalier manner. Today babies are supposed to receive their first vaccine on the first day of life, followed in quick succession by a horde of vaccines at 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 15 months.

Today the CDC and the AAP recommends, and most pediatricians adhere to 37 doses of 14 different vaccines given to all babies by 18 months. By the time they go to school they will have received a total of 50 doses.[6] The US recommends more vaccines and more doses than any other country, yet in 2009 the USA was 34th in the list of infant mortality rates. In 2014 the USA has dropped to 56th in the world. This chart compares the Infant Mortality Rate with the number of vaccines given per country.

Despite the repeated phrase “vaccines are safe and effective,” the CDC recommends a vaccine schedule that HAS NEVER been tested for safety. In fact, no long-term testing has been done on ANY VACCINE. They have never been tested for carcinogenicity (i.e. if it causes cancer) or for any impact on future fertility, a fact that can be confirmed by reading the “package insert” for any vaccine.

Vaccines involve the immune system in a process that leads to compromised immunity, yet pediatricians and doctors think they “protect from infectious disease.”

Actually, vaccines can harm the immune system itself, causing a variety of life-long susceptibilities to illness. Instead of making our babies healthy, vaccines are actually making them sick. We need to realize that the early scientists developing vaccines did not understand how the immune system works and how it develops. Dr Suzanne Humphries has devoted her career to searching the science and clearly explains how parents can best their baby achieve true life-long health. [7]

An elaborate false history has been concocted to convince the public (including medical doctors and others trained in the medical field, politicians, and parents) that vaccines are safe and effective. Many involved in conveying this wrong understanding did so with the best of intentions – but that doesn’t make them any less WRONG.

Contamination is a frequent occurrence in vaccine manufacturing facilities. Most vaccines utilized today are actually manufactured in China. The labs are not physically inspected for adherence to safety standards, yet parents are repeatedly urged to trust in the safety of the vaccines.

Vaccine ‘science’ involves circular reasoning; it is a closed system which admits no fault. It goes like this…

Vaccines have saved us from millions of deaths. Vaccines are safe and effective. Vaccines have eradicated all the infectious diseases. If we stop vaccines we will have massive epidemics and many will die? Why? Because vaccines have saved us from millions of deaths

THOUSANDS of babies have adverse reactions after vaccines – including severe seizures, permanent neurological damage and even death. Vaccine manufacturers and the CDC, which makes the recommendations, have NO LIABILITY for any injury caused by any vaccine – EVER. They make and recommend a product with a great potential for harm, but bear no responsibility for the safety to recipients. A small fraction of the vaccine injury cases have received compensation through the US National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program that has paid out nearly $4 Billion to roughly 4,000 families.

Serious vaccine injury reactions should spark the most intensive investigation by those concerned about vaccine safety, i.e. the CDC. These ‘servants of public health’ should be eager to find out HOW MANY are impacted and WHY. But those charged with vaccine safety are not interested in exploring or revealing these connections. Their primary goal seems to be the preservation of their vaccine program, and thus their jobs, careers and the entire enterprise. They churn out ‘scientific studies’ with authors who have been indicted for fraud, they falsify data, they hold secret meetings to discuss serious links between vaccines and autism with the goal of hiding the results from public knowledge, and they boldly and blatantly lie before Congressional hearings.[8][9][10][11][12]

The medical cartel zealously guards the sanctity of vaccines. Blind guides seeking babies on their altar. Many families whose child (or children) suffered severe vaccine injury remain captive to the medical system throughout the life of the child because of the damage done in the name of “protection.” These families suffer enormously. Most marriages end due to the stress of caring for a severely neurologically damaged child. These parents worry about who will care for their children after their death.

While not every child receiving vaccines will suffer severe disability, the burden of vaccine injury impacts all of society. It is time for everyone to become fully informed on how the immune system functions and exactly HOW vaccines harm a child’s brain development.

Could our world and the health of our children be BETTER WITHOUT vaccines?

Vaccination Notice

Posted on April 5, 2015 by Becky Hastings

An alternative approach and legal form can be found here.

Notice to agent is notice to principal

Notice to principal is notice to agent

As the parent of Sally Doe, I am prohibited by law from endangering my son or daughter; therefore, I declare the following: Sally Doe’s address: 2525 Maple Lane, Grove City, Ohio

1) I am aware that those ordering and/or administering vaccines have been granted immunity from liability should my son or daughter suffer from a vaccine-caused injury or illness. The Vaccine Injury Compensation Trust Fund is not an acceptable alternative to me. (Reason listed below – #10)

2) Unless I receive the vaccine manufacturer’s package inserts, I have not been given full disclosure regarding any vaccine. CDC or public health vaccine information sheets and/or websites are not acceptable alternatives. (Reason listed below – #4 & #5)

3) I am aware that vaccine schedules have been established by the CDC and are promoted by public health departments, the American Academy of Pediatrics and other organizations. I do not accept CDC recommendations as science-based. (Reason listed below – #4 & #6)

4) I do not recognize the CDC as a government health advocacy organization. It is a corporation listed on Dun and Bradstreet and headquartered in the STATE OF GEORGIA, with strong ties to the pharmaceutical industry. Therefore, their recommendations are influenced by the ‘fiscal’ health of their corporation.

5) I am aware that physician or institutional records are frequently reviewed by the HEALTH, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF, a corporation headquartered in COLUMBUS OH and listed on Dun and Bradstreet that receives monetary compensation from the CDC to perform this function. Therefore, the state public health department’s recommendations and actions are influenced by the ‘fiscal’ health of their own corporation.

6) I do not recognize the AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS nor the AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS as health advocacy organizations. They are both corporations (listed on Dun and Bradstreet) that are head-quartered in the STATE OF ILLINOIS and the STATE OF KANSAS respectively, whose monetary compensation from the vaccine manufacturers contributes to the ‘fiscal’ health of their corporations.

7) I am aware that many physicians are paid higher reimbursement rates for administering vaccines.

8) I am aware that LEGISLATORS for the corporation known as the STATE OF OHIO, listed on Dun and Bradstreet, vote on statutes for the STATE OF OHIO. These include statutes mandating certain vaccines for attendance in educational institutions. As the LEGISLATORS have no medical training and can easily be influenced by drug company lobbyists and/or the CDC, I do not accept their mandates as science-based. To the best of my knowledge, I have signed no contract with these LEGISLATORS. Therefore, their corporate vaccine statutes do not apply to me or my son or daughter unless I consent to abide by them.

9) I am aware of multiple scientific peer-reviewed papers that have exposed the dangers of many vaccines as well as the “herd immunity myth” of 1933.

10) I am aware that the corporation HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF (listed on Dun and Bradstreet and headquartered in WASHINGTON DC) determines claims paid from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Trust Fund via a secret administrative procedure and also profits from vaccine patents.

11) I have concluded that failure to follow CDC vaccine recommendations is less likely to endanger the health of my child or others than following their recommendations.

As parent or guardian I am prohibited by law to endanger my child. So, for the reasons I have listed and more, I deny permission for anyone to administer CDC recommended vaccines to my son or daughter unless they provide me with the vaccine package insert, allow me to determine if the health risks are acceptable, and sign a document stating that they personally, not me, (and/or my spouse) will be responsible for any injury or illness (as defined by the International Medical Council on Vaccination) the vaccine they administer might cause.

NOTE: This document can be used to protect those that administer vaccines (physicians, nurses or others) or are obliged to adhere to corporate statutes (including educational institutions) from any punitive statutory actions or penalties.

Parent/Guardian: Jane Doe Signature: ___________________ Date: ______

Parent/Guardian: John Doe Signature: ___________________ Date: ______

Witness: Richard Smith Signature: ___________________ Date: ______

Witness: Anna Thomas Signature: ___________________ Date: ______

This form in easily printable version: Vaccination Notice Template 6-17-14

Journey Boost

because sometimes all we need is a little boost…

Category Archives: Vaccine Questions

California Vaccine Mandates #SB277

How many shots?

My Dear Friend – it’s about vaccines

Liar Liar Pants on Fire

Vaccine Risks vs Benefits

Vitamin K links

Vaccines and Childhood Cancer?

Vaccines & DNA

Our Children, Our Future

Vaccination Notice

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this: