Category Archives: Vaccine Questions

Doctors Learn Vaccine Risk

Posted on by
3

Struggling to understand how good doctors can advise parents to follow dangerous medical practises? Dr Moss, highly qualified practising physician, and Professor teaching young doctors, has a unique understanding.

Another doctor explains his viewpoint of the direction of our country, especially the medical system and the desire for total control. His childhood experience of being forced to flee from Vietnam gives him insight into the direction of medical care and practice in this country.

Thank you to the Vaxxed Team for their tireless collection of real life stories of vaccine injury and awakening to the truth.

Dr Neides from Ohio was fired after writing a blog post in which he explains his adverse reaction to a flu vaccine and began asking questions about vaccine safety. The way he was treated by the medical establishment launched him into a detailed investigation of the history and safety of vaccines. In this segment of his talk, he makes 8 specific points regarding why he now questions vaccines.

Dr Neides warns us that Pharma is now racing to bring 140 new vaccines to the public. In many states there are campaigns to mandate vaccines for school attendance, as was passed by California in 2015. What are you doing to learn and share the truth?

What is your story?

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 23 years Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety.

 

Vaccines & Autism: Connection or Collusion?

Posted on by
1

Did CDC collude with HHS and IOM to obfuscate the facts, while at the same time awarding one family ±$20M in damages when vaccines caused regressive autism? Hannah Poling’s father was a neurologist. Bailey Banks’ family also received compensation for vaccine injury. His symptoms are also ASD.

This is all old news, yet the majority of parents who obediently take their children for vaccine injections, have NO IDEA that millions of dollars have been paid out to at least 1,322 families for vaccine injury that caused brain damage – something like ASD. While some families received compensation for vaccine injury – the 5,000 families that sought justice through the Autism Omnibus proceedings in the VICP were denied. Dr Brian Hooker is one of those parents whose son developed regressive vaccine induced autism and he was part of the Omnibus proceedings denied by the VICP. Since his son’s vaccine injury he has tirelessly researched the facts, the studies, and the data – and he has the credentials to do so because he is a research scientist with a PhD. He speaks openly about CDC collusion with Dr Suzanne Humphries in this 4 minute video:

In a 2009 piece published by the Huffington Post, Robert F Kennedy Jr reports:

“an explosive investigation by CBS News has found that since 1988, the vaccine court has awarded money judgments, often in the millions of dollars, to thirteen hundred and twenty two families whose children suffered brain damage from vaccines. In many of these cases, the government paid out awards following a judicial finding that vaccine injury lead to the child’s autism spectrum disorder.” https://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-f-kennedy-jr-and-david-kirby/vaccine-court-autism-deba_b_169673.html

Autism Speaks reports on some of the details of the Hannah Poling case:

“Hannah was developing typically until a regressive episode at 18 months that closely followed the 9 vaccinations she received at a well-baby visit. Further testing revealed that Hannah 1) developed autism and 2) had the metabolic signature of a mitochondrial disorder which may have made her vulnerable to injury from the vaccines themselves or the fever that commonly accompanies vaccines and many childhood illnesses.” Autism Speaks

The Federal ‘Vaccine Court’ officials conceded that Hannah’s underlying mitochondrial dysfunction was aggravated by her vaccines, leading to fever and an “immune stimulation that exceeded metabolic reserves.” http://www.ageofautism.com/2010/09/autism-speaks-mangles-the-poling-decision-nyt-blog-adds-insult.html

Rosanne Lindsay states the facts clearly:

What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You
Most families who suffer injury or death from vaccines have at least two things in common: 1) they were denied informed-consent by their doctor (package insert) so they could not make an informed-choice, and 2) they were not told that any adverse reaction should be reported by a doctor to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the database that compiles information on each vaccine injury and death.

Without informed consent, parents feel rushed to judgment. They do not know that combining childhood vaccines at one visit is not safe. They do not learn that each vaccine contains multiple antigens (i.e., pneumococcal vaccine contains 13 antigens), carcinogens (formaldehyde), antibiotics, fetal tissue cells, and heavy metals (aluminum, mercury). They are not told that since 1990, the VAERS database has received more than 500,000 reports of suspected adverse reactions to vaccines. Or that VAERS is a passive reporting system that reflects a 50-fold underreporting of adverse events representing only 1% of actual events. Without real information, parents do not question the growing vaccine schedule deemed “safe and effective” and Congress has no incentive to abolish a Vaccine Court that serves to hide the truth about a growing vaccine-injury epidemic. [see more http://www.natureofhealing.org/cdc-vaccine-court-create-epidemic-autism/


#SayItNow
#CDCTruth

If you are just beginning your exploration of the truth about vaccines, you might find this ‘Table of Contents‘ page helpful.

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 23 years Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety.

Does TDaP protect Newborns?

Posted on by
Reply

It is an incredible shame that doctors are urging parents to do the exact opposite of what will protect their precious newborn from pertussis exposure.

Since the parents and the doctor are primarily interested in protecting their newborn baby from exposure to pertussis, according to the science, allowing anyone contact with the baby who has been recently vaccinated with TDaP is contraindicated. That is the science. Here are 2 studies every doctor should respect AND READ, because they are published in well respected journals.

Regarding Bordetella pertussis, Stanley Plotkin wrote: “we are far from a full understanding of the organism, the disease, the correlates of protection…immunity after vaccination is more or less transient. Therefore, it is not surprising that control of pertussis is relatively poor…The result is the continued circulation of the bacterium in family contacts, regardless of their vaccination history, resulting in exposure of vulnerable newborns.”

Plotkin, Stanley A. “The Importance of Persistence.” Advances in Pediatrics., U.S. National Library of Medicine, 1 Dec. 2016, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5106615/.

Even more importantly, the following study, funded by the FDA presents facts in direct opposition to the recent advertisements seen on television by GSK.

The title of this paper makes the conclusion abundantly clear: “Acellular pertussis vaccines protect against disease but fail to prevent infection and transmission on a human primate model.”

Warfel, Jason M., et al. “Acellular Pertussis Vaccines Protect against Disease but Fail to Prevent Infection and Transmission in a Nonhuman Primate Model.” PNAS, National Academy of Sciences, 14 Jan. 2014, www.pnas.org/content/111/2/787.

For those of us who are not experienced in analysis the details of scientific papers, Del Bigtree from ICAN, Informed Choice Action Network, has long experience as a medical journalist. This 4 minute video explains the details found by Dr Jason Warfel and his team in their study of pertussis transmission in animal primates. [Edited 2020: the original video in which Del describes the baboon study and it’s important has been removed by YouTube along with the entire Highwire channel. I found a clip (below) from another episode where Del Bigtree explains clearly how the pertussis vaccine does not stop transmission and could be the culprit in spreading whooping cough to the vulnerable. The abstract of Dr Warfel’s study here.]

For more information on vaccines, I have prepared a “Table of Contents” page for new parents, or anyone interested in vaccine safety, and protecting their precious baby from infectious illness.

Every parent wants to protect their precious child from any potential harm. Most grandparents are thrilled with the idea of seeing their new grandchild. In this world of vast information, it can be challenging to navigate to the truth.

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 23 years Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety.

TDaP for Grandparents, etc.

Posted on by
1

Your child is having a baby. You can’t wait to meet your new grand baby. BUT, you’ve been told you should get a TDaP to “protect the new baby”. Is that a good idea for your health? (if you don’t want to read, skip to the end and watch the video)

There are two different vaccines on the market offered to adults. Neither has been tested to see if it could possible cause cancer, mutagenesis (gene changes) or infertility. I know you probably aren’t concerned about infertility at your age, but cancer…

  • Adacel by Sanofi Pasteur contains 330 mcg aluminum. View the complete vaccine package insert here.
  • Boostrix by GlaxoSmithKline contains 390 mcg aluminum. View the complete vaccine package insert here.

Both contain inactivated bacteria and were released in 2005 for age 10 to 64 years. Adacel is NOT approved for individuals 65 years and older. In addition to the bacterial components and the aluminum, Adacel contains “≤5 mcg residual formaldehyde, <50 ng residual glutaraldehyde and 3.3 mg (0.6% v/v) 2-phenoxyethanol (not as a preservative).”Boostrix’s other seriously concerning ingredients are: 4.5 mg of sodium chloride, ≤100 mcg of residual formaldehyde, and ≤100 mcg 382  polysorbate 80 (Tween 80). Polysorbate 80 is known to open the blood brain barrier which is why it is used in cancer therapy which attempts to target brain tumors. The combination of aluminum and polysorbate 80 could have a SERIOUS NEGATIVE IMPACT on AGING BRAINS!

Is the amount of 330 mcg or 390 mcg of aluminum safe?

There is no experimental scientific evidence of any kind that proves this amount of aluminum is safe to inject into any age person.

“Curiously, if you were to perform a simple search of the scientific literature available on aluminum hydroxide and aluminum phosphate prior to 1970, you can find studies such as this one, where it is being used to produce experimental epilepsy and seizures in monkeys. Or this one, where it was found to cause neurofibrillary degeneration of nerve cells (which is known to lead to the development of Alzheimer’s). Or this one, in which it was described that there were “difficulties” in mass-vaccinating children with aluminum-containing vaccines, due to febrile reactions, aluminum cysts at the site of injection, post-vaccination encephalopathy (brain dysfunction, disease, or disorder), paralytic poliomyelitis of the injected limb, and other unfavorable results…

There’s an endless amount of research on experimentation with aluminum for various purposes, but when it comes to real information on what might be a safe limit of injection, the literature is lacking.” Think Love Healthy

Please see the entire blog by ThinkLoveHealthy.com for a lot more detailed referenced information on the history of aluminum safety.

When it comes to injecting aluminum there is no scientific study that has ever been done to determine safe limits. Babies currently are given up to 1200 mcg of aluminum in just one ‘well baby’ visit at 2 months. This is 48 times the safe limit set by the FDA of 25 mcg. Babies receive further shots with similar amounts of aluminum repeated at 4 and 6 month visits!!

There is no evidence to say that aluminum is safe for babies, their parents, or their grandparents. There is no way to know if an individual will be adversely impacted. Aluminum is present in every brain of individuals with Alzheimer’s studied by Dr Christopher Exley. Dr Exley also found the highest levels of aluminum ever seen in the brains of those suffering with autism.

Far more could be written about whether the TDaP is even effective in preventing the transmission of pertussis bacteria to the precious new baby. If you have any doubt and are still thinking of getting it, please watch this video on the scientific basis of effectiveness of the vaccine.

If the above video link is not working, try this one: https://www.bitchute.com/video/BncDakVIQgq8/

I put this information together very quickly primarily to help a new good friend who is struggling with a request from her daughter in law to get the TDaP to ‘protect’ her son’s first child. We are praying the parents will seek wisdom with regard to vaccines! If you have a loved one convinced vaccines are good, I wrote this for you.

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 23 years Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety.

Common Sense for New Parents

Posted on by
1

Every parent – well 98% – want what is best for their baby. But it is confusing to know WHAT is BEST?

In this 5 minute video I share my heart with new parents. Don’t take my word for it. Investigate everything I say. Get to know the reasons people think vaccines are a good idea. Get to know the body of evidence that shows there is more unintended harm from vaccines than is generally acknowledged by government regulatory bodies.

Learn discernment. Take your time. Delay your decision until you are absolutely sure that what you are doing has been proven to be safe – beyond any shadow of doubt. Your baby is worth it. Your baby will thank you.

Take more time to research vaccines than the time you take to decorate baby’s room; more than research car seats; more than researching the latest cell phone. This could be the single most important decision you make for your child. You can do this. You can read the vaccine package inserts and understand exactly what the ingredients are in the vaccines. Ask questions. Don’t rely on ‘expert’ opinion. Only you, as the parents, will live 100% with the consequence of your choice. There is no ‘do over’. No second chance.

All my love,

Becky

ps I’ve prepared a ‘table of contents’ if you’d like to explore more information on vaccines.

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 23 years Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety.

 

Hey Doc, What about Aluminum?

Posted on by
3

This post was prepared with essential input from my friend, Katie Walker.

Ask your pediatrician these 10 questions, report back to me, and I will buy you dinner!

(Disclaimer, prepare for an awkward meeting with your doctor because most do not know the critically important answers, which are listed below.)

1. What is the amount of aluminum considered, but not proven, to be safe to inject into an infant per FDA guidelines?

2. What is the amount of aluminum injected into children’s bodies via vaccines? And which vaccines contain aluminum?

3. What is the main purpose of having aluminum in vaccines?

4. Is aluminum neurotoxic?

5. Has the amount of aluminum contained in the current CDC recommended vaccine schedule been tested for safety?

6. Are there long-term studies demonstrating the safety of aluminum in vaccines?

7. Which ingredient in vaccines allows the blood brain barrier to be penetrated by aluminum?

8. Can an abundance of neurotoxins in the body cause neurological damage?

9. Is Autism proven to be caused by neurological damage?

10. What is the current rate of Autism in the United States?

Answers…

1. 25 mcg for an infant for aluminum in an IV.[1][2][3] The limit for vaccines has been arbitrarily established at 850 mcg.[4]

2. 250-800 mcg per vaccine. Aluminum containing vaccines: Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, DTaP (Diphtheria, Tetanus and Pertussis), HPV, Polio, Pneumococcal, and Meningococcal B.[5]

3. To elicit an immune response. [6]

4. Peer reviewed studies from NIH confirm the neurotixicty of aluminum. [7][8][9][10]

5. No [no citations because no citations exist to demonstrate safety of the current recomended vaccine schedule].

6. No [no citations because no citations exist on the longterm safety of aluminum]. Damage from aluminum exposure has been cited.[11][12]

7. Polysorbate 80, an ingredient in vaccines.[13] Glyphosate is another. Glyphosate is the main active ingredient found within Monsanto’s “Roundup,” a herbicide which is now ubiquitous and has been implicated in neurological damage of both ASD and Alzheimers.[14]

8. Peer reviewed studies from NIH confirm yes [15]

9. Peer reviewed studies from NIH confirm yes [16]

10. 1 in every 59 children have been diagnosed as ASD. This data comes from a 2018 CDC report which investigated children born in 2006 and represents exponential growth.[17]

Please take some time to research the topic of Aluminum in vaccines… You can begin by reading all the cited research papers in the footnotes. No parent, no doctor desires to harm a baby. Yet, if we haven’t fully explored aluminum impact on the body, we may be doing just that.

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 23 years Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety.

[1] “The aluminum content of large volume parenteral (LVP) drug products used in total parenteral nutrition (TPN) therapy must not exceed 25 micrograms per litre ([micro]g/L).” https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=201.323

[2] “Aluminum may reach toxic levels with prolonged parenteral administration [this means injected into the body] if kidney function is impaired . . . Research indicates that patients with impaired kidney function, including premature neonates [babies], who received parenteral levels of aluminum at greater than 4 to 5 micrograms per kilogram of body weight per day, accumulate aluminum at levels associated with central nervous system and bone toxicity [for a tiny newborn, this toxic dose would be 10 to 20 micrograms, and for an adult it would be about 350 micrograms]. Tissue loading may occur at even lower rates of administration.” [Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Document NDA 19-626/S-019, Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act for Dextrose Injections.]

[3] “A single vaccine given to a six-pound newborn is the equivalent of giving a 180-pound adult 30 vaccinations on the same day. Include in this the toxic effects of high levels of aluminum and formaldehyde contained in some vaccines, and the synergist toxicity could be increased to unknown levels. Further, it is very well known that infants do not produce significant levels of bile or have adult renal capacity for several months after birth. Bilary transport is the major biochemical route by which mercury is removed from the body, and infants cannot do this very well. They also do not possess the renal (kidney) capacity to remove aluminum. Additionally, mercury is a well-known inhibitor of kidney function.”–Boyd Haley Ph.D.

[4] “The 850 μg of aluminum per vaccine FDA amount was derived from data that demonstrated that this amount of aluminum per dose enhanced the antigenicity and effactiveness of the vaccine [9,10], but does not include safety considerations.” Reconsideration of the immunotherapeutic… (PDF Download Available). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323653092_Reconsideration_of_the_immunotherapeutic_pediatric_safe_dose_levels_of_aluminum [accessed May 15 2018]. Lyons-Weiler, J, and Ricketson, R.A. (2018, March).  Reconsideration of the immunotherapeutic paediatric safe dose levels of aluminum.

[5] Aluminum amounts:
Hib (PedVaxHib brand only) – 225 mcg per shot
Hepatitis B – 250 mcg
DTaP – depending on the manufacturer, 170 to 625 mcg
Pneumococcus – 125 mcg
Hepatitis A – 250 mcg
HPV – 225 mcg
Pentacel (DTaP, HIB and Polio combo vaccine) – 330 mcg
Pediarix (DTaP, Hep B and Polio combo vaccine) – 850 mcg
At birth, most children are given the hepatitis B vaccination. The amount of aluminum in the Hepatitis B vaccine alone is almost 14 TIMES THE AMOUNT OF ALUMINUM THAT IS FDA-APPROVED. A baby who receives all recommended vaccines will be injected with 4,925 mcg of aluminum by 18 months.

[6] “An adjuvant is a substance that enhances the antigen-specific immune response, induces the release of inflammatory cytokines, and interacts with Toll-like receptors and the NALP3 inflammasome. The immunological consequence of these actions is to stimulate the innate and adaptive immune response. The activation of the immune system by adjuvants, a desirable effect, could trigger manifestations of autoimmunity or autoimmune disease. Recently, a new syndrome was introduced, autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA), that includes post vaccination phenomena, macrophagic myofasciitis, Gulf War syndrome and siliconosis.”

[7] G., Kroum, R., E., G., Jerome, F., & J. (2015, January 08). Biopersistence and Brain Translocation of Aluminum Adjuvants of Vaccines. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2015.00004/full

[8] A “ToxGuide” for aluminum published by the US Department of HHS. Please notice no mention of aluminum as an injected component of vaccines. But notice, “The most sensitive target of aluminum toxicity is the nervous system…” Yet the only exposure mentioned is via inhalation, ingestion and skin contact. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxguides/toxguide-22.pdf

[9] Khan, Z., Combadière, C., Itier, V., Lux, F., Exley, C., Mahrouf-Yorgov, M., . . . Cadusseau, J. (2013, April 04). Slow CCL2-dependent translocation of biopersistent particles from muscle to brain. Retrieved from https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1741-7015-11-99

[10] Scientific research continues to validate that aluminum is in fact causing Alzheimer’s disease: Thinklovehealthy. “Aluminum in Vaccines: History and Toxicity.” An Evidence-Based, Heartfelt Blog., 25 Apr. 2018, thinklovehealthy.com/2017/06/22/aluminum-in-vaccines-history-and-toxicity/.

[11] Vera-astra, O., Medina, G., Cruz-Dominguez, P., Jara, L. J., & Shoenfeld, Y. (2013, April). Autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (Shoenfeld’s syndrome): Clinical and immunological spectrum. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23557271

[12] Dangers of aluminum uncovered in this detailed documentary on the longterm impact of aluminum in the body as explored by three individuals and the doctors trying to find the cause of their debilitating illness, known as MMF: MPH, M. T. (2017, July 26). Aluminum Dangers Uncovered in Documentary on “Mysterious Illness” Linked to Aluminum-Containing Vaccines. Retrieved May 15, 2018, from http://info.cmsri.org/aluminum-and-your-health-blog/dangers-of-aluminum-uncovered-in-documentary-on-mysterious-illness-lined-to-aluminum-containing-vaccines

[13] Polysorbate 80 allows neurotoxins to permeate BBB: “Polysorbate 80 allows neurotoxins (like the aluminum in vaccines) and nano particles (both noted separately in the study) to permeate the rBMEC’s (rat brain microvascular endothelial cells), otherwise known as blood brain barrier, at lower levels than the neurotoxin or the nano particle alone. So, in itself Polysorbate 80 is not neurotoxic, but when combined with known neurotoxins, it creates a pathway for brain penetration.”
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/21348312/

[14] http://www.collective-evolution.com/2017/09/23/study-shows-what-glyphosate-aluminum-operate-synergistically-to-destroy-the-human-brain/

[15] Intramuscular injection of aluminum hydroxide containing vaccines shows both longterm persistence of aluminium hydroxide and ongoing local immune reaction: Gerard, R. K. (2001). Macrophagic myofasciitis lesions assess long-term persistence of vaccine-derived aluminium hydroxide in muscle. Brain,124(9), 1821-1831. doi:10.1093/brain/124.9.1821

[16] One example of what aluminum does in the brain, body and central nervous system: Kalahari, Masahiro, and Midori Kato-Negishi. “Link between Aluminum and the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease: The Integration of the Aluminum and Amyloid Cascade Hypotheses.” Advances in Pediatrics., U.S. National Library of Medicine, 8 Mar. 2011, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056430/.

[16] Tomljenovic, L., & Shaw, C. A. (2011, November). Do aluminum vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism? Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099159/

[17] https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/new-data.html

 

Vaccines: Helpful or Harmful?

Posted on by
21

“Immunizations not only do not prevent any infectious diseases, they cause more suffering and more deaths than any other human activity in the entire history of medical intervention.” Viera Scheibner, Ph.D.

In 1985, Viera Scheibner, Ph.D. a retired principle research scientist for the government of Australia, with more than 90 published scientific papers in refereed journals to her credit, created a baby monitor called Cotwatch with her husband, electrochemical engineer Leif Karlsson. CotWatch is a breathing monitor for babies who are diagnosed “at risk” for SIDS, or “Cot Death” as it is known in Australia. Over the next three years, the couple monitored hundreds of babies and studied the event reports that their CotWatch devices produced. By studying the data from these baby monitors and all event reports, to their complete surprise, they discovered a critical period after every routine vaccination where babies were more vulnerable to death. 

“By 1988 we knew that vaccines are killing babies,” said Dr. Scheibner.

Once Dr Scheibner and Leif Karlsson had proven the causal link between vaccines and SIDS, they presented their findings to the medical community for peer review. In a presentation at Templin’s Resort she gave an explanation as to what they discovered:

“Our breathing monitor scientifically established the causal link between vaccines and sudden infant death,” said Dr. Scheibner.

What was the response of the medical community? Dr Scheibner’s findings were completely ignored. With no attempt to verify the results, and no attempt to do further testing, the establishment turned their back on the results Scheibner and Karlsson found.

The bottom line to Dr. Scheibner’s scientifically flawless arguments is that those who are designing and implementing vaccine policy are doing so with the full knowledge that their policies are killing babies. Furthermore, published medical literature shows that vaccines are altering the genetic code of people and causing them to suffer damage to their immune systems which is making them vulnerable to numerous physical and psychological complications. This alteration of DNA has been studied and reported by Sound Choice:

The contaminants found in vaccines and drugs that are manufactured using human fetal cell lines present the perfect storm of contaminants to cause genomic instability. Some childhood vaccines contain very high levels of short human fetal DNA fragments, which gene therapy studies have taught us are the perfect size to insert into our genes. Some childhood vaccines also contain a retroviral contaminant called HERVK, which is in the same family of retroviruses as the one that caused cancer in 4 of 9 boys. http://soundchoice.org/research/

Vaccine advocates cannot debate Dr. Scheibner, nor can they defend their motives because the very scientific journals upon which they depend for support, The Journal of the American Medical Association, the Lancet, and the New England Journal of Medicine have all published reports that support her findings.

If the head of your local health department’s vaccination program were to experience Dr. Scheibner’s lecture and then continue advocating mass vaccination as sound public health policy, there would only be one question left to ask him: Why should you not be prosecuted for conspiracy to commit murder? In the same way, officials making recommendations for the CDC (ACIP) who refuse to honestly investigate the broad range of scientific research on SIDS, aluminum adjuvants, and total body burden of aluminum, need to be held accountable. Their actions, often with clear conflicts of interest, have caused death and serious injuries to countless babies, children, and families over many decades. Even paediatricians who continue to tow the line and follow the recommendations which are geared towards supporting the pharmaceutical industry, are demonstrating wilful ignorance by refusing to ask and answer basic questions on the safety of vaccines.

Dr. Scheibner has written two painstakingly referenced and footnoted books on the subject: “Vaccination: 100 Years of Orthodox Research Shows Vaccinations are a Medical Assault on the Immune System” and “Behavioral Problems in Childhood: The Link to Vaccination”. Both are available on Amazon.

A true scientist seeks to explore all information available — not so that it will support their preconceived perspective, but to find the truth. A true scientist does not criticize and attack those presenting information they disagree with. Science does not ignore or alter studies which do not support the hoped for outcome. Science is about an unbiased examination of facts.

We all have bias. It’s ingrained, but true science seeks to free itself of bias through open respectful dialogue. True science examines previous information in light of new information and designs studies to get answers, not to support their point of view.

Dr Aaby is known to be a scientist who has strongly supported vaccines throughout his career. He and others had questions on the health outcomes of vaccinated children. He designed a retrospective analysis of data collected over the last 30 years in Guinea Bissau and asked honest questions, seeking honest answers. His conclusion gave him pause. He found DTP vaccine “was associated with increased mortality.”  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360569/  This is called an unintended consequence. One can only guess how shocked Dr Aaby was to find his own data demonstrated a conclusion which went against all his previous assumptions about the benefits of vaccines. Yet, not only did he publish this information, he recently published a follow up study with very similar conclusions for slightly older children.  https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00079/full

Dr Chris Exley is another scientist who was forced to change his view on vaccines because of the science he discovered:

“The new evidence strongly suggests that aluminum is entering the brain in ASD [autism spectrum disorders] via pro-inflammatory cells which have become loaded up with aluminum in the blood and/or lymph, much as has been demonstrated for monocytes at injection sites for vaccines including aluminium adjuvants.”   https://www.hippocraticpost.com/infection-disease/aluminium-and-autism/

As J.B. Handley, a parent of a vaccine injured child and an avid researcher of ALL the science, points out:

“Science is a continuum, an emergence of truth through many different studies that often have to be pieced together before the picture becomes clear. And, scientific progress can sometimes move slowly until that moment when an emerging truth presents itself in such a way that it can no longer be denied. In my opinion, Dr. Exley’s study provided the only data missing from an airtight explanation of what happened to my son and so many other children.”   https://jbhandleyblog.com/home/2018/4/1/international2018

We need more truth seeking scientists such as Dr Aaby, Dr Chris Exley, Dr Chris Shaw, Dr Andrew Wakefield, Dr Suzanne Humphries, Dr Judy Mikowits, Dr James Lyons-Weiler,  and 100s of others. All of these individuals began with the perspective that agreed with their training. They assumed vaccines were good and necessary to protect children and keep them healthy. Each one, on a unique path, came to question that stance. When questioning, they sought honest fact based answers. Most were shocked by what they discovered.

So many claim public health is absolutely dependent on a strong vaccine uptake. Is this true? Does society really reap an overall benefit from vaccines? If I could get vaccine promoters to read just thing, this might be it.

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 23 years Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety.

 

If I could get vaccine proponents to read just one thing…

Posted on by
1

Aluminum in vaccines. How much? How safe?

[For an auditory reading of this blog] Edit 30 August 2023. Just realized the video my friend and fellow activist to help educate parents on vaccine reality, has been removed. Must be really really good, helpful, lifesaving information! Glad to report the blog is still here and available to read for yourself.

These basic questions should cause most parents, doctors, nurses, and grandparents to begin asking serious questions about the vaccines recommended for babies and children, especially in light of a remarkable paper just published in March 2018 which evaluates safety standards for aluminum in vaccines.[1]

Some things to note:

The DTaP shot on its own contains 170 – 625 mcg of aluminum depending on the manufacturer. You can get the exact amount from the vaccine package insert (vpi) for the brand your doctor is using. It is recommended that babies receive the DTaP at 2, 4, 6, 18 months and another shot at 4-6 years – for a total of 5 shots. Do the math: 5X the number you find in the vpi.

Some doctors like to give a combined shot like Pediarix or Pentacel because ‘it causes baby less distress to have less needles at once’ or something like that. Please note that the amount of aluminum in these shots is 850 mcg and 330 mcg respectively. Do the math if this combined shot is recommended for more than one dose for your baby.

Hepatitis B is given routinely on the first day of life – before breastfeeding is well established – and is followed up with 2 more doses for a total of 750 mcg of aluminum. Researching this disease and the history of this vaccine reveals concerning information.

Note how many doses of Hib and Pneumococcus are going to be given to your baby and do the math for those shots too.

PLEASE. Add up the total amount of aluminum that will be injected into your baby if you follow the doctors’ schedule. Do this mathematical exercise BEFORE you agree to any shot. Ask your doctor to do the math. Your doctor was not taught about the toxicity of aluminum or how it impacts the baby.

Aluminum has been considered GRAS (generally regarded as safe) and necessary – because without it there will not be the same level of blood titer increase. However, dosing for aluminum in vaccines was not worked out for safety according to the baby’s body weight. The amount of aluminum considered to be acceptable in vaccines is based on studies of INGESTION of aluminum in animals.[1]

If parents are concerned about hepatitis infections, diphtheria infections, tetanus infections, hib infections, meningitis, and pertussis infections for their brand new baby, there is a multitude of information that can help you understand and treat these illnesses in our modern day. Most of these diseases decreased in numbers and severity long before the vaccines were introduced. Similar infectious illnesses for which no vaccine was made, also decreased. Studying accurate graphs of the incidence of these infectious illnesses show that the decrease in all of them had more to do with clean water, improved sanitation practices, and better nutrition than with the vaccine. Not all doctors recommend vaccines.

You may find this latest analysis of aluminum safety in vaccines as interesting and shocking as I did.[1] I find encouragement that there are honest scientists seeking honest answers regarding the safety of aluminum in vaccines.

For more detailed information go to Reconsideration of the Immunotherapeutic Pediatric Safe Dose Levels of Aluminum by James Lyons-Weiler and Robert Ticketson, published in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology in March 2018. Thanks to HighWire with Del Bigtree for bringing this information to my attention and to James Lyons-Weiler for researching and presenting this information.

If after reading this, you still want to inject your baby or yourself with vaccines, please read this first as it outlines ways to prepare that could possibility mitigate some of the adverse side effects of vaccines.

Becky Hastings, blogger, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 23 years, Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety, health, and wellness.

[1] Lyons-Weiler, James, and Robert Ricketson. “Reconsideration of the Immunotherapeutic Pediatric Safe Dose Levels of Aluminum.” Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, Urban & Fischer, 8 Mar. 2018, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X17300950.

Is Your Dr a Wellness Expert?

Posted on by
Reply

I made a live video! It’s not great, but it’s heartfelt. I was burdened to share a message with new parents, why do we go to doctors for WELLNESS information? While many doctors have learned a lot about nutrition, health, and wellness, they did not learn about it during their training in medical school! 

We take our babies to wellness checkups without fail, yet have doctors studied wellness? Do they know what is required to achieve life-long health and wellness? Are doctors amongst the most healthy occupational groups?

The CDC has refused to study a completely non vaccinated population of children as compared to a population of children who are fully vaccinated, despite the fact that they have been recommending vaccines for over 50 years. Such a study would easily be possible as there has always been a percentage of people who refuse vaccines.

However, there are three outspoken pediatricians with very large pediatric practices who are able to compare the health of vaccinated children, partially vaccinated, and fully vaccinated children up close. Dr Meyer Eisenstein had over 10,000 children in his practice. He never gave vaccines, as he had learned from his mentor Dr Robert Mendelssohn how to promote a robust intact immune system. There were no cases of autism amongst his 10,000 patients. Dr Paul Thomas and Dr Bob Zujac came to understand the harm caused by vaccines when they saw children in their practice experience extreme vaccine injury. They had not been trained to identify vaccine injury, but it was so obvious they couldn’t deny it, and both decided to investigate the true risk of vaccines and true prevalence of vaccine injury. Today, after many years of research they have many children in their population who have not had any vaccines. Dr Bob Zujac states clearly: the sickest children in my pediatric population are the fully vaccinated, next come the partially vaccinated. By far the healthiest children in my patient population are those who have had no vaccines.

Since there are strongly opinionated ‘experts’ on all sides of the vaccine discussion, it’s up to parents to research and make an informed choice on what is going to yield lifelong wellness for their baby. Here is a list of 240+ doctors and scientists who speak out with their questions about vaccine safety. Physicians For Informed Consent is a nonprofit organization dedicated to safeguarding informed consent in vaccination providing education to doctors and the public:

“A growing number of physicians, scientists, attorneys, and other community leaders are advocating for scientific integrity, and the right to informed consent for vaccination, just like all other medical procedures. We are pleased to provide the much-needed platform for education on infectious disease, the immune system, and informed consent.” Dr. Shira Miller, PIC founder and president

The choice is yours. If you do decide to give vaccines to your baby, please read this first of 28 essentials you need to know so that you can be more fully informed on the possible impact of vaccines. Before taking your baby for vaccines, please read this list of steps you can take to help reduce the potential of vaccine injury.

Becky Hastings, blogger, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 23 years, Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety, health, and wellness.

 

 

Is Public Health BEST Served by Vaccines?

Posted on by
1

Posted below is a recent conversation I had with a public health academic. I felt it was worthy to share. Please add your insight on how vaccines impact public health in the comment section. One point I failed to mention in this conversation is that graphs accurately depicting health data show that rates of deaths due to infectious illness had experienced dramatic decreases prior to the introduction of vaccines. This includes disease for which no vaccines were ever successfully developed. Something to explore further another time…

“I’m an evidenced based practice researcher and public health professor. One that’s actually contributed to textbooks on public health issues. I’ll be honest, you stating that scientists “know about the public health risks of vaccines, but choose not to say anything.” is a disturbing and definitive statement for someone who doesn’t work in the field.

Public health practitioners, vaccinologists, and immunologists, spend their life’s work trying to meet the health needs of the population. Yes, there are risks to taking vaccines, as there are with any type of medication or drug. In this particular scenario, the benefits of vaccines far outweigh those risks. Period. The End.

You know how people determined that? Evidence based practice through clinical trials and countless years of scientific research. Years and years of labor intensive quality science.

You want to talk about Wakefield? He’s a disgrace to the scientific community and evidence based practice. Want to know why his article got retracted from one of the most reputable scientific journals in the country? Because he falsified his methods and results. That is not ok!

I suggest you go to reputable peer-reviewed research if you’re really interested in the issue. You won’t find one article that indicates that vaccines cause autism? Not a one. Correlation also doesn’t imply causation, but you won’t find reputable research that indicates that, either.”

Wow. It’s really awesome that you are so committed to public health, and actually lecture students on this topic. I am sure you will want to make 100% sure every fact you share is thoroughly substantiated. I’m just a mom, a grandmother, a truth seeker and sharer, and a breastfeeding counselor for 23 years. You are also correct, generalizations should not be made because they are not helpful and do not prove points. I apologize for my generalized statement.

Yes, I understand that many in the field of public health spend their lives trying to figure out how to improve health in populations. My father spent his entire career working for the CDC. He was an MD who chose to become a research scientist in the area of virology. He and I had many conversations about the public health benefits and risks of vaccines. Back then we had to share paper copies of research we could find. The internet just makes information so much more accessible. I also wholeheartedly endorse evidence based research – and question all evidence that is presented.

Interesting that you say there is not one article to indicate “that vaccines cause autism”. I don’t think I had ever made the point that they do, nor has Dr Wakefield. My main focus is NOT that vaccines cause autism, but that vaccines cause a wide range of serious injury, including debilitating auto-immune conditions, allergies, and long term impacts – far more than the public is led to understand – and that the risks of the vaccine should be seriously evaluated to determine if they are actually greater than the risk of having the infectious disease with appropriate effective treatment. More and more researchers in the field are coming to understand that autism is a neuroinflammatory condition. Official channels poured so much money into finding a genetic connection, but after over a decade of research, seem to have concluded that there is no clear genetic cause, although certain gene mutations, such as the MTHFR could make some more at risk.

Have you read the published work by Dr Chris Shaw? I’ve linked a very short video where he summarizes his findings. Using the latest available information and technology, he looked at the impact of injecting rats with amounts of aluminum that would compare with the amounts of aluminum currently injected into babies in the CDC recommended schedule of vaccines. He was pretty shocked by the result. The most startling part of his research is the complete lack of response. No one criticized his methods, told him where/how he was wrong. Just complete silence. You should check it out. Of course you will probably find, if you ‘search on the internet’ people who criticize him. I’m sure you can wade through to find the true facts.

Another very interesting case is the case of Hannah Poling. Her father was a neurologist and the Poling’s made a claim to the NVICP – I’m sure you know what that is, but for others, it is the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program set up in 1988 to pay out families whose children were killed or injured by vaccines. To date it has paid out $3.9 billion dollars to those who manage to prove their claim of damage due to vaccines while arguing against Department of Justice lawyers in a closed courtroom without full access to the legal process of disclosure. Anyway, Hannah Poling’s case was interesting because she regressed into autism following vaccines with serious permanent disabilities and her family was awarded a significant amount to compensate for her claim. I think it was determined that she has a ‘mitochondria disorder’ which was why the vaccines had caused the autism-like symptoms. A law professor, Mary Holland from NYU School of Law, then published a detailed analysis of the NVICP data and found that about 86 other cases matching the diagnosis of autism have been paid by this ‘vaccine court. Interesting. The lawyers and judge must have been convinced that the vaccines caused their autism symptoms.

Did you know that Congressman Posey has received ±100,000 pages of documents from Dr William Thompson, Senior Research Scientist at CDC, and that he was awarded whistleblower status by President Obama? He admitted that his epidemiological study was fraudulent and that the study authors, including Frank De Stefano and Colleen Boyle, destroyed data in order to hide the evidence of harm from vaccines. Actually, I think he stated that Colleen Boyle refused to attend the ‘destroy the evidence’ meeting, so all the other lower ranking authors had to do that job. He explained quite clearly the different role players, the disturbing results they found, and what they were told – from their bosses – to destroy. One of the specific facts they were especially eager to hide was the connection between African American boys and a higher risk of autism if they received their vaccines on time. I believe the figure is about 300% increase for that group.

Another interesting Scientist who has published in this field is Poul Thorsen. He worked at the CDC and has his name on some epidemiological papers. He is currently one of the top 10 most wanted fugitives on the FBI’s website for his role in embezzlement against the CDC, yet the CDC keeps promoting his studies.

Did you know that US Government departments, including the CDC and NIH, hold patents on over 20 vaccines and therefore benefit financially?

And, as to Dr Wakefield being a disgrace to the medical community, I don’t think you could be more wrong. I don’t think you will find a more compassionate, selfless humanitarian in the world. Despite all the assaults – like this one – on him personally and professionally, he continues his struggle to help those dealing with devastating neurological damage. You should really find out what the parents of his patients think about him. Imagine if someone were saying those types of remarks about you without even knowing you?

And finally, what I should have said, is that the 54 scientists called together to CDC’s secret meeting at the Simpsonwood Retreat Center in June 2000 were all in the realm of ‘public health officials’ and they all were appraised of the latest findings by a young CDC epidemiologist, Dr. Thomas Verstraeten. He presented his research demonstrating a clear ‘signal’ between vaccines and neurological damage that just ‘would not go away.’ The 200+ pages of the transcript from that meeting, freely available to the public through FOIA requests, demonstrates exactly how much they did know and how they responded to this information. Especially poignant was the response by the WHO representative – arguably the most significant public health official of all –

“But there is now the point at which the research results have to be handled, and even if this committee decides that there is no association and that information gets out, the work has been done and through the freedom of information that will be taken by others and will be used in other ways beyond the control of this group. And I am very concerned about that as I suspect that it is already too late to do anything regardless of any professional body and what they say…My mandate as I sit here in this group is to make sure at the end of the day that 100,000,000 are immunized with DTP, Hepatitis B and if possible Hib, this year, next year and for many years to come, and that will have to be with thimerosal containing vaccines unless a miracle occurs and an alternative is found quickly and is tried and found to be safe.” – Dr. John Clements, World Health Organization, Simpsonwood, GA, June 7, 2000

Strange that as a serious public health official, he was more committed to getting vaccines into children than looking into the possible harm those vaccines were causing. Dr Thomas Verstraeten, the lead CDC epidemiologist analyzing the Generation Zero data showing a high correlation between mercury and autism, was frustrated by the focus of participants on managing information, liability, and reputations, rather than on science and data. He wrote this in an email on July 14, 2000 to Dr. Phillipe Grandjean:

“Unfortunately, I have witnessed how many experts, looking at this thimerosal issue, do not seem bothered to compare apples to pears at the best and insist that if nothing is happening in these studies [referring to some old science on other types of mercury exposure] then nothing should be feared of thimerosal.

I do not wish to be the advocate of the anti-vaccine lobby and sound like being convinced that thimerosal is or was harmful, but at least I feel we should use sound scientific argumentation and not let our standards be dictated by our desire to disprove an unpleasant theory.”

I applaud you if you have read this far. I’m happy to discuss anything further. I’m sure I don’t know as much as you do, and I haven’t read all your text books, but I am 100% committed to finding the truth and helping parents have healthy happy babies. I believe we achieve the best health, as individuals and as communities, by boosting the innate immune system and the body’s own defense against infectious disease. It is critically important to understand the two different branches of immunity and how vaccines impact overall health and immune response. So much has been discovered in the last 10 years that many of the foundations on which vaccines were developed must be allowed to be questioned. Science is never settled. There are hundreds, if not thousands, of scientists and doctors who have spent thousands of hours reviewing all vaccine related science and seeking to make sense of the devastation in the wake of vaccines.

One of these is Dr Aaby. With others, he published a paper in 2017 on research to understand the impact of vaccination in a retrospective look at Guinea Bissau. But since you are current in the field of public health, I guess you may have already read it. His conclusion must have been disturbing for him since he is such a strong proponent of vaccines.

Another scientist examined the evidence and was forced to change his opinion. As a world leading researcher in the area of aluminum toxicity, the words of Dr Chris Exley are profound: “I did not see a role for aluminum in autism. And I didn’t see a role for aluminum in vaccines in autism. I have to change my mind now on both of these. I have to change my mind that aluminum has a role in autism. I believe it now does.” –Dr Chris Exley, 2017

So many doctors, pediatricians and others, who have taken the time to review the literature for themselves – and not just the promotional material provided by the manufacturers – have started speaking out about their observations. Dr Bob Zajac is one. In this interview he makes some amazing observations, particularly of note is that in his pediatric practice, the fully vaccinated children are the sickest, partially vaccinated are healthier, but the healthiest by far are the non-vaccinated children.

I sincerely pray that all who read this will continue their own research until they are satisfied that the risks of the vaccine are lower than the risk of getting the actual disease, with the up-to-date effective inexpensive treatment options available to us today. A lifetime of vaccine injury carries an emotional, physical, and financial cost that is an enormous burden to the individual and the public. Don’t take my word for it. Research the facts for yourself (I have compiled some info as a starting point, for those who would find this helpful). If you do decide to vaccinate someone you love, please read this to make sure you are fully informed on many aspects not known or shared by those administering the vaccine, and read this to prepare to reduce the possible risk of vaccine harm.

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 23 years Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety.