Category Archives: Truth

Are aborted baby parts in vaccines?

Posted on by
4

14 week gestation

The short factual answer is, YES.

Babies were specifically harvested from their mother’s wombs to provide living human cells as a desirable growth medium for vaccine development in the 1960s. Furthermore, the end product produced today contains some of the actual human DNA fragments used in the development of these products because it is impossible to fully purify a vaccine from all the human cellular debris. The DNA fragments are injected into the body with the rest of the components of the vaccines.

It’s true. While vaccines are pushed as a way to prevent infectious illness in children, most people are not aware that many vaccines are built on aborted human fetal tissue. Furthermore, parents are not told that this ‘preventative measure’ is known to kill some and harm countless numbers of others.

The rubella vaccine was the first vaccine derived from aborted human fetal cells. The rubella vaccine was added as the “R” to the MMRII licensed for use in 1979. This vaccine, exclusively used in the USA and used widely throughout the world, contains both RA27/3 cells (congenital rubella virus derived from an aborted baby) and WI-38 the first cell line used as a growth medium in vaccine development, derived from lung cells harvested from an aborted female baby.

MRC-5, the name of a second cell line used in vaccine development was developed in the U.K. using lung fibroblast cells from a male baby aborted at 14 week gestation (the size of the photo at the top of the page) for ‘psychiatric reasons’. Sometimes referred to as “human diploid cells,” MRC-5 is used in the manufacture of many vaccines, including Pentacle vaccine (since 2008), Hepatitis A and A/B combination vaccines (since 1995), polio vaccine (Poliovax, 1987), and shingles vaccine for adults (2006).

In 1995 Varivax, manufactured by Merck, targeting the varicella or chicken pox virus, derived from aborted human fetal tissue was approved for the USA market and added to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) schedule. This vaccine was developed using both WI-38 cells harvested from a female baby, and MRC-5 cells harvested from the lung fibroblast cells of a 14 week gestation male baby.

Havrix, a Hepatitis A vaccine, propagated in human fibroblasts from the MRC-5 line was approved for use in limited populations groups in 1996. In 2005 ACIP expanded the recommendation for the Hepatitis A vaccine to include all babies in the USA. [1]

“Pentacel® contains inactivated polio viruses grown on the MRC-5 human fetal cell line. Since 2008, Pentacel® is recommended for children at 2, 4 and 6 months of age, and may account for the recent idea that scientists have become more adept at diagnosing autism at younger age. Diagnosis at younger age may more likely be the result of introducing human fetal cell vaccine contaminates to younger children.” [2]

Even today, the CDC confidently describes the rubella vaccine in their pink book:

“The RA 27/3 rubella vaccine is a live attenuated virus. It was first isolated in 1965 at the Wistar Institute from a rubella-infected aborted fetus. The virus was attenuated by 25–30 passages in tissue culture, using human diploid fibroblasts. It does not contain duck, chicken or egg protein.” Previous rubella versions contained duck embryo, dog kidney or rabbit kidney cells. [3]

The scientists were not concerned about the possible long-term impact of injecting foreign human DNA into a developing baby. The vaccine package insert for this vaccine continues to state, nearly 40 years later, “M-M-R II has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or potential to impair fertility.” [4]

Surely, in 40 years there has been ample time to study how this vaccine, containing human DNA fragments, could be impacting those that are injected with it.

It has been suggested that there was only one abortion that provided the tissue necessary to produce the cell lines used in vaccine development. This is a side issue. But, a closer look reveals that a total of at least 80 separate, elective abortions recorded were involved in the research and final production of the present day rubella vaccine: 21 from the original WI-1 through WI-26 fetal cell lines that failed, plus WI-38 itself, plus 67 from the attempts to isolate the rubella virus. https://cogforlife.org/vaccine-abortions/

As a further attestation to the reality of the scientific use of aborted human fetal tissue, it is noted that these cells lines are still available to purchase on-line today:

RA27/3 congenital rubella virus infected cells: https://www.atcc.org/Products/All/VR-1359.aspx

WI-38 human female fetal lung cells: https://www.atcc.org/Products/All/CCL-75.aspx

MRC 5 cell line male lung fibroblast cells: https://www.atcc.org/products/all/CCL-171.aspx

WHAT IS THE IMPACT of injecting human DNA into our BABIES???

See the next blog….

The previous blog in this series examines the choice we make in using vaccines as a ‘preventative measure’.

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 25 years, Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety. Becky also loves mountain biking and appreciates donations which mainly encourage her. 

[1] Hepatitis A is manufactured by both Merck and GSK and was first approved in 1996 for limited population groups. “To produce each vaccine, cell culture-adapted virus is propagated in human fibroblasts, purified from cell lysates, inactivated with formalin, and adsorbed to an aluminum hydroxide adjuvant.” The GSK version also has a preservative, 2-phenoxyethanol. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/hepa.html

[2] Impact of environmental factors on the prevalence of autistic disorder after 1979. Theresa A. Deisher*, Ngoc V. Doan, Angelica Omaiye, Rumiko Toyama and Sarah Bwabye, Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, 1749 Dexter Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.Received 13 May, 2014; Accepted 9 July, 2014 http://soundchoice.org/scpiJournalPubHealthEpidem092014.pdf

[3] CDC description and history of rubella vaccine https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/rubella.html

[4] Complete vaccine package insert for the MMRII https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/UCM123789.pdf

A Choice

Posted on by
1

A song I heard recently resonated in my heart: “I need You to soften my heart. I need You to open my eyes, to pierce through the darkness, expose the lies and deception.” I think I added some words, but you get the idea! Here is the song in case you want to start worshipfully. It’s all about surrender and trusting that God loves you.

I’m just a mom, and now a grandmother, trying to figure out what is truly healthy for babies and children. I’ve been at this for a long time, since about 1982 when I found out God was blessing my husband and I with our first child.

Imagine this scenario:

There is a disease. It may make some people sick. A very small number of people may die if they get it. The disease can be spread from one person to another, but self-imposed separation can reduce the spread, and most people will recover fully and obtain lifelong protection and never get that disease again.

Now, some smart people didn’t want to see people suffering. They didn’t have confidence in the body’s self-healing mechanisms. They considered themselves able to circumvent God’s design. They developed a ‘preventative measure’ against the disease.

This ‘preventative measure’ may prevent someone from getting the disease, but it is known that it will kill some previously healthy people – we know that some percentage will die from receiving this ‘preventative measure.’ And, it will cause lifelong damage and suffering to an undetermined, but substantial, number of people.

Which do you choose?

Please bear in mind that there are other ways of helping to reduce the impact of the disease and shorten the duration of suffering – ways that are completely safe and beneficial.

What do you choose? The man-made ‘preventative measure’ that WILL kill and harm some? Or, the potential risk of getting the disease, and using known safe measures to treat it?

What number of healthy people dying will it take before the ‘preventative measure’ is unthinkable?

There are many ways of reducing the duration and severity of the illness, which do not result in death or life-long impairment. Would you choose these? Or would you choose the ‘preventative measure’ that will kill and seriously harm some?

Your child could be one of the ones harmed.

But, the plot thickens…

What if you knew that this ‘preventative measure’ is built on the lives of aborted babies, and the final product contains DNA fragments from the cells of those babies?

More on that in the next blog…

Before we choose a ‘preventative measure’ that has the known capacity to kill some, we need to research that preventative measure extremely carefully, paying close attention to who is providing the information, and what they may possible gain from their connection to the ‘preventative measure’.

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 25 years, Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety. Becky also loves mountain biking and appreciates donations which mainly encourage her. 

Vaccines and Eczema

Posted on by
8

Are we going backwards or forwards? Keep in mind as you read this precautionary policy from 1958 that they were only talking about a few vaccines, smallpox, polio and diphtheria. Today babies are given 36 vaccines against 14 different infections before they are two years old. The CDC has quite a lot of information about who should NOT get each vaccine, but nowhere do they mention eczema as a reason NOT to get vaccines.

In 1958 the American Academy of Pediatrics made the following statement:

1) No child with atopic eczema or other skin disorder should be vaccinated.
2) No child should be vaccinated if any member of his family has eczema or other skin disorder.
3) Parents of children with eczema should be notified at the onset of the disease of the danger from vaccination contact.
4) If a sibling of a child with atopic eczema is vaccinated, he must be completely separated from that child for at least 21 days.
5) Forms used by state and local health departments for parents’ consent to vaccination should include an appropriate warning of the contraindications.
6) Eczema vaccinatum should be a reportable disease.
7) Patients recently vaccinated must be excluded from pediatric wards containing patients with atopic eczema, other diseases of the skin, burns or healing surgical incisions.
8) Vaccination may be recommended at 2 months of age, especially for babies from strongly allergic families.

Received December 18, 1957.
Accepted February 18, 1958.
Copyright © 1958 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Read the abstract and access the full paper here.

It is somewhat comforting to know that the CDC recognizes there are some people who should NOT get a DTaP shot:

However, rarely have I ever heard of pediatricians expressing hesitancy about administering this shot or asking about these adverse events. Also, many times a “life-threatening allergic reaction after a dose of DTaP” is denied as having been connected to the vaccine.

The bottom line is, in 1958 eczema was recognized as a signal that the immune system could not handle a vaccine. Today, it’s up to parents to educate and inform themselves on the true risk of vaccines in order to have a healthy baby. Parents will bear all the weight and responsibility for any vaccine harm.

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 23 years Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety.

Addendum. Helpful information if you have experienced eczema. https://thinkingmomsrevolution.com/thinking-moms-guide-red-flags-eczema/

This 2004 study purports to study vaccines and allergic responses such as eczema, but does not use a non-vaccinated control group. They compare DPT to MMR vaccines and make ‘adjustments’ for various factors. The ‘science’ seems to be designed to squelch all true understanding of the real risk of vaccines. Studies that have compared completely non vaccinated to vaccinated children show the non vaccinated to be significantly healthier. These studies have mostly been privately funded and are not recognized by government agencies who refuse to do their own study.

In the 20 minute video below Dr Shiva Ayyadurai provides a helpful informed explanation of the modern immune system and compares it to what was known about the immune system at the time of the development of vaccines. The truth is, doctors today are still operating under the old understanding and many will not associate auto-immune disorders like eczema to vaccines.

MIT PHD Explains the Reality of the Modern Immune System https://t.co/XHZhY17RXh— Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, MIT PhD. Inventor of Email (@va_shiva) January 2, 2020

Unvaccinated: Why growing numbers of parents are choosing natural immunity

Posted on by
2

A new book. This might be the perfect gift for your friend who is pregnant!

Unvaccinated: Why growing numbers of parents are choosing natural immunity for their children by Forrest Maready

I highly admire the work of Forrest Maready. He lives next door, in North Carolina (I live in South Carolina). His family has been profoundly adversely impacted by vaccines, which he only realized AFTER he began to research the topic extensively. He writes with a passion to convey the truth about the benefits of natural immunity and the unintended harm caused by our widespread vaccine recommendations. As a former vaccine proponent, he understands how difficult it is to encounter and process new information that challenges your underlying paradigms.

I have watched many of the 100s of videos he has made. I also met him personally at a meeting in Atlanta and found him to be a very smart, outside the box thinker. The world needs more people fully informed and gently sharing truth. If you read his book, and share it with others, together, we will make an impact!

“If you always wanted to give someone a short, cheap, easy-to-read explanation of why you’ve chosen natural immunity instead of vaccines, I’ve got a new book on Amazon! Only $7 and will change the mind of even the most skeptical mother-in-law!” Forrest Maready

Why are more parents choosing natural immunity for their children? When I first heard that people were purposefully not vaccinating their children, I was shocked. Vaccines have been described as the most incredible medical invention of all time—a miracle of science and technology that has saved the lives of untold millions. I couldn’t believe that seemingly intelligent, educated parents were purposefully foregoing vaccines for their children, and in fact, were so convinced these medical prodecures were harming us, they would go out of their way to try to convince others. When a close friend of mine told me that his infant child was going to be unvaccinated, I thought he was completely insane. After much coaxing, he convinced me to do my own research and challenge him on his beliefs. A few months later, I had read things about vaccines and disease that I had never heard before. Things that no one—including our pediatrician—had ever mentioned. I was convinced there was a giant conspiracy to try and discredit vaccines, but after diving headfirst into recent scientific research seldom mentioned in the news, I eventually came to believe much differently about vaccines and the diseases they are supposed to protect us from. This short book will take you along the same journey I made as I transitioned from a dedicated vaccinating parent to someone who now questions whether any vaccines are actually worth the risk, even in third world countries. It barely scratches the surface of this, the greatest debate of our time, but if nothing else, will give you a clear idea as to why an increasing number of parents are raising their children unvaccinated.

I personally have seen the obvious glowing health of non-vaccinated babies and children. In fact, my husband recently commented that a non-vaccinated baby we know stands out sharply in contrast to other babies of the same age because of his bright perceptive eyes, and vibrant glowing health. While many moms are struggling with breastfeeding, struggling for baby to gain weight, and struggling with many other challenges in the first year of life – which may or may not be connected with receiving so many vaccines – the non-vaccinated babies I have encountered rarely have these issues. Moms who have personally vaccinated one child, but made a choice to not give vaccines to subsequent children, are often amazed at the difference. Doctors who have large numbers of non-vaccinated babies and children in their practise have come to realise they are by far the most healthy children.

Those who choose not to vaccinate are not endangering the world, or taking advantage of the risk and sacrifice of others (as I have been accused). The best gift I can give to the world is a vibrant innate immune system. I support the immune system with clean eating and natural supplements. I do not fear infectious disease for myself, my children, or my grandchildren. Our bodies are designed to have a strong defensive strategy to combat disease when we seek to cooperate with it, and not override it with injecting very questionable ingredients.

Those who convey a sense of shock and horror for “the children who are immune compromised and not able to receive vaccines” need to do a lot more thinking about the issue, which would take at least another whole blog to address.

Be well. Be healthy. Inform yourself. Share truth with love.

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a life & wellness coach, Becky seeks to inspire and motivate others to find increased energy, joy, and longevity. Navigating information to achieve long-term health goals in every area of life is a passion!

 

 

 

Choosing a Good CBD Oil

Posted on by
2

Now that you are convinced to try CBD Oil derived from hemp because it is legal, safe, and highly effective as a health supplement, how do you decide which product to choose?

Dr. Rachna Patel, a medical marijuana expert, states there are three key questions to help you choose a quality product.

  1. Is the manufacturer/supplier of the oil accountable to anyone?
  2. Is the product lab tested?
  3. What method was used to extract the CBD oil?

I’m confident to report that the company I have been repping passes these tests with flying colors.

  1. They are accountable to you, the customer, and to their thousands of affiliates. They are so confident of their product, that they offer a 30 money back guarantee.
  2. Every batch is 3rd party tested for potency and purity. You can find certificates verifying the CBD content on their website.
  3. The CBD oil is extracted from organically grown hemp in the USA using a CO2 extraction method that does not leave behind any harmful residue.

Additionally, the prices compare very favorably with other quality brands AND there are no ‘fillers’ or unwanted ingredients – only full spectrum CBD and hemp oil.

Please leave your name and email address below if you would like more information on this product, or refer back to the person who shared this blog with you.

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a life & wellness coach, Becky seeks to inspire and motivate others to find increased energy, joy, and longevity. Navigating information to achieve long-term health goals in every area of life is a passion!

Healing Plant

Posted on by
9

Most people have heard of medical cannabis. Most are aware of a recreational plant that is smoked, known by a variety of names: pot, weed, marijuana, cannabis, etc. Many have heard of CBD and perhaps CBD oil.

CBD is the abbreviated name for cannabidiol, an active cannabinoid found in cannabis. Cannabis is a plant that has been cultivated for both medicinal and industrial properties for thousands of years. Hemp is the word used for the cannabis plant which contains very low levels (< 0.3%) of THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) which can produce a psychoactive effect in the brain. Extensive research studies reveal the benefits of CBD, which has no psychoactive or harmful side effects. Hemp is legal to be grown and CBD oil is legal in all 50 states.

CBD oil has been found to reduce pain and inflammation, lower blood sugar levels, and protect the brain and nervous system from degeneration. These widespread benefits result because of the Endocannabinoid system in our bodies. In our body we have Cannabinoid type 1 receptors (CB1) concentrated in our central nervous system (CNS: brain, cranial nerves, and spinal cord). Supplementing with CBD oil can restore balance to many detailed chemical processes in the body.

Additionally, CBD successfully stimulates the release of 2-AG, an endocannabinoid that stimulates both CB1 and CB2 (Cannabinoid receptor type 2). These receptors play a key role in regulating mood, memory, appetite, sleep, and reduction of inflammation within the human body.

Watch this video which discusses the benefits of CBD oil.

Thus we see how CBD oil is able to bring so many different benefits to a wide range of people. Additionally, CBD oil is being studied for its ability to protect from cancerous cells and tumor formation. CBD may lower blood pressure, indirectly promote bone growth, and act as a natural antibacterial.

CBD oil is now legal in all 50 states, and many other countries in the world. It is safe. It is effective. It can be used by everyone from children to pregnant women. A detailed analysis and understanding of the cannabis plant and the Endocannabinoid system leads many to realise that this plant is uniquely designed as a primary ‘medicine’ for our body. CBD oil has also been found to bring benefits to many animals.

I am thrilled to have found a company that provides CBD oil from 100% organic, grown in USA, non GMO, hemp. This CBD oil is formulated with hemp seed oil, contains no other filler ingredients, and every batch is 3rd party tested for purity and potency. All this AND at an affordable price. If you have any symptoms at all, if you are currently using prescription medications and would like to reduce them, or if you would just like to protect your brain from degeneration due to natural ageing, this is a supplement for you. I will benefit in a small way from any purchase you may make, but, by far, the greatest benefit I receive is hearing the wonderful stories of pain relieved, medication reduced, and lives reclaimed because of this amazing product.

If you received this link from a friend, be sure to contact them so they can continue to share this incredible product and opportunity with you.

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a life & wellness coach, Becky seeks to inspire and motivate others to find increased energy, joy, and longevity. Navigating information to achieve long-term health goals in every area of life is a passion!

Honest Doctors

Posted on by
4

Where do honest doctors, seeking honest answers to vaccine questions end up?

While doctors receive limited training on vaccine science in medical school, they usually end up being avid supporters of the USA government recommended vaccine program which currently recommends 71 vaccines targeting 18 infectious illnesses[1]. The underlying message dominating medical training is that vaccines are good, vaccines are safe, and vaccines have saved millions of lives. Very rarely do doctors inquire as to the ingredients in vaccines, the impact these ingredients may have on the body in the short or longterm, and the reality of devastating vaccine injury. Most doctors are not familiar with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act passed in 1986 which provides indemnity to vaccine manufacturers and a way for the public to seek redress through the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.[2]

Additionally, most doctors are not aware of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) or the fact that this system is limited because vaccine injuries are underreported.[3] Doctors do not know they should be on the look out for adverse reactions. They do not know that they should “report clinically important adverse events that occur after vaccination of adults and children, even if you are not sure whether the vaccine caused the adverse event.”[4]

However, there is a positive trend amongst doctors to add to their training and seek to educate themselves, on their own time, on the reality of vaccine harm and the lack of safety studies proving safety. After a thorough examination of the facts, many of these doctors devote thousands of hours to reading research papers and examining the abundant evidence of vaccine harm. Many doctors are concluding that the risk of harm from the vaccine is greater than the potential benefit of the vaccine. As more and more doctors are coming to this conclusion, they are seeing more and more non vaccinated children and are very surprised to notice that the fully non vaccinated children have overall better health than their vaccinated or partially vaccinated counterparts. This fact is usually quite a surprise to them, since they have been educated to believe that children must have vaccines to be healthy.

Coming to an awareness of vaccine reality can be a tumultuous process. The fact that vaccine makers are protected from liability, and the fact that government agencies, assisted by the media, seek always to frame vaccines in a positive light and may ignore or falsify claims of vaccine safety, can be a bitter pill to swallow.  It requires time to fully examine evidence, rather than beliefs. It requires an openness to question many dogmas that have been accepted as truth.

The good news is that more and more doctors who have reached such an awareness. Some are not yet confident to express their views publicly. They may fear censure or retaliation by a medical system, and corporate media controlled public, that could adversely impact their career and work prospects.

Other doctors are undeterred by the negative reactions and confidently share the research they have done and the reality of vaccine injury in the interest of public and individual health. I have compiled a list of 260+ doctors and scientists but have removed it from this blog. You can easily find many highly educated, intelligently doctors boldly speaking out by doing a search on Youtube.

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counsellor for over 25 years Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety.

[1] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html

[2] https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546

[3] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632204/

[4] https://vaers.hhs.gov/reportevent.html

Child Sacrifice in USA????

Posted on by
7

Child sacrifice was an integral part of ancient pagan worship. Most people living today find the entire concept abhorrent. But child sacrifice continues every single day. Children are sacrificed on the vaccine altar. This fact is well known and documented — a percentage of healthy babies injected with these ‘protective‘ chemical cocktails will die. How many is the acceptable percentage?

“You must not worship the LORD your God in their way, because in worshipping their gods, they do all kinds of detestable things the LORD hates. They even burn their sons and daughters in the fire as sacrifices to their gods.” Deuteronomy‬ ‭12:31[1]‬ ‭

Why would ancient people sacrifice their children? Perhaps they were seeking the favor of the deity. Perhaps they were asking for protection, health, and abundance. Perhaps they feared the deity. Note the use and manipulation of these universal emotions and parental desires in the current vaccine promotion agenda.

The USA recommends more vaccines than any other country. The infant mortality rate in the USA is amongst the highest of all developed countries. Healthy babies will die as a result of receiving vaccines.

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) will even pay out up to $250,000 per infant death by vaccine.[2]

Every vaccine carries a risk. The CDC, as of 2018, recommends 74 doses of vaccines for 18 different infectious illnesses between 0-18 years. Before your  baby is two years old, the CDC says they need 41 vaccines against 14 different infections, delivered via 24 needles. There is great risk of harm from the combined amounts of aluminum, other toxic substances, and contaminants, like human fetal cell fragments, in the vaccines. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-660) created the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), a fund based on a contribution of 75 cents from every vaccine sold, that will compensate families in the USA if they can prove that their baby’s death resulted from the vaccines.[3] Each participant in the vaccine program, pays a ‘vaccine tax’ towards the inevitable injuries that WILL happen.

Vaccine injury happens.        How often?

No one really knows. Deaths related to vaccines are rarely admitted to be connected by the doctors who administer the shots. Medical personnel are trained to ignore obvious adverse events and often ridicule patients who insist there is a connection between the shot/s given and reactions that occur soon after. For most deaths of ‘unknown cause’ there is an autopsy, but coroners are encouraged not to find evidence of vaccine involvement in the sudden unexplained death of a previously healthy infant/child in close proximity to receiving the standard recommended vaccines.[4] In fact, in one case, the coroner told the grieving mother that while there was a special panel that could be run to determine if vaccines were involved in her son’s death, it would cost them $2,500. Since it is not standard procedure, the parents were responsible to pay this extra amount. The parents were dealing with $10,000 of funeral expenses and were not able to get these important test result. In other cases coroners do not run the tests when asked by parents and refuse to release tissue samples requested for further testing.

While deaths have been compensated by the VICP, the medical establishment in general is taught that vaccine reactions are ‘very very rare.’ They are trained to view the reactions following a vaccine as some strange phenomenon – but probably in no way related to the vaccines the healthy baby, child or teen was given. Thus, most parents do not file a claim with the VICP after the death of their baby. Doctors, nurses, and parents usually are unaware of the possibility of filing such a claim. However, there have been 1,268 claims filed for death from vaccines since 1988. A total of 19,456 claims for injury and death have been filed, with 6,030 receiving compensation.[5]

The process of receiving the $250,000 payout for a death from the fund is complex and challenging.[6] Parents who are struggling to come to terms with the sudden unexplained death of their otherwise healthy baby/child, which strangely correlates to the time of recent vaccines, often do not possess the physical and emotional strength necessary to complete the cumbersome application process. Submission of a claim requires a $400 payment up front.

Russian RoulletteSo the numbers of deaths and injures commonly reported doesn’t reflect the reality.

The truth is, every vaccine given is somewhat like a game of Russian roulette. Vaccines, however, are different in an important way. In Russian roulette, some of the barrels hold blanks, but in the vaccine game, every shot holds poison. The only question is what will this dose of poison do to this baby?[7]

If you are new to this topic, please explore other blogs written specifically for parents here. I am convinced parents have been so conditioned to fear infectious illness, and accept vaccines, that they end up oblivious of the true threat. They willingly offer their children on the vaccine altar, unaware and uninformed of the risks.

Paul, 1st Century, wrote some insightful instructions:

See to it that no-one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Jesus Christ. Colossians 2:8

Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them. Ephesians 5:11

For I am not seeking my own good but the good of many, so that they may be saved.  I Corinthians 10:33

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 23 years Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety.

[1] There are many passages in the Bible that refer to the practise of child sacrifice and God’s abhorrence of it.

[2] The age is not specified, but includes infant deaths: “Compensation varies, depending on the injury, and can include as much as $250,000 for pain and suffering, lost earnings, legal fees, and/or a reasonable amount for past and future care. For a death, you may receive as much as $250,000 for the estate and legal fees.” USDHHS, Health Resources and Services Administration, National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, How To File a Claim,  http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/fileclaim.html

[3] USDHHS, Health Resources and Services Administration, National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program,  http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/index.html

[4] In the tragic circumstance of you or anyone you know facing the death of a child after vaccine, a lot of helpful information has been compiled in A Parent’s Guide: What to do if Your Child Dies After Vaccination, Guidelines to Autopsy Medical Tests, by Norma Ericsson, President SANE Vax & Catherine J Frompovich, Consumer Health Researcher & Author.

[5] US Dept of HHS, HRSA, Data and Statistics, updated 06/26/2018. https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation/data/index.html

[6] USDHHS, Health Resources and Services Administration, National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, How To File a Claim,  http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/fileclaim.html

[7] There are known increased risks of harm from vaccines, but the government has avoided most attempts to identify the risk factors for specific individuals. Known risks include, but are not limited to: a genetic predisposition based on mutation of the MTHFR gene, family history of autoimmune disorders, premature birth with other risk factors, family history of adverse events following vaccines.

Speaking Truth to Power

Posted on by
10

I was privileged to be able to attend the ACIP (Advisory Committee for Immunisation Pratices) held in June 2018 at the CDC (Centre for Disease Control) in Atlanta, Georgia.This appointed committee is responsible for the recommended schedule of vaccines for children and adults in the USA and now includes 18 different vaccines given in about 62 doses during a child’s first 18 years of life. By 18 months of age this committee recommends a child receive 34 vaccines.[1]

As part of the agenda, time is allowed for Public Comment at the end of each day. The two day meeting is available to live stream. Someone kindly recorded my comments from the two sessions and put them together in a video.

I share with you, not because I think I did a great job or to get your congratulations. This is absolutely essential information that needs to be delivered to every parent making vaccine decisions. There are complex non-specific effects from vaccines. For the lay person, that means, there are unintended consequences. Yet, the ACIP, the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, the HHS, the IOM, the AAP, the AAFP, ACOG, and other esteemed institutions, which claim to promote and protect health, ARE ALL IGNORING powerful evidence of harm. This behaviour has been well entrenched. More and more solid research and evidence is being reported and should be raising serious concerns about the combination of vaccines given, the amount of aluminum in the schedule, the role of human fetal cell contamination, and the serious consequences of giving vaccines to premature babies, etc. Yet all these austere bodies continue to support this enormous toxic burden foisted upon the bodies of babies and children.

It truly must stop. It must be re-evaluated. Yet I felt as if the 14 members of ACIP barely listened to my comments. Will they continue to remain wilfully ignorant of the harm being inflicted on far too many children?  Their two day agenda included discussions of many more vaccines they want to introduce, including a 3rd MMR vaccine because they admit that the vaccine is NOT WORKING! Cutting back or analysing their current recommendations seems far from a priority.

New efforts to push vaccines are particularly disturbing, especially the one from the Americal College of Nurse-Midwives Resources on Immunizations pronouncing “Vaccines are SAFE for you and your baby, even during PREGNANCY!”, a blatant falsehood since vaccines have never been studied for safety during pregnancy and all ingredients are known to cross the placenta and the blood brain barrier of the vulnerable developing infant.

Please share. Please pray. Please protect your baby, and your neighbours’ baby.

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 23 years Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety.

 

[1] If you have never looked at the details of the CDC schedule, I highly recommend you review for yourself this 8 page document with many notes on each vaccine. Every time I review the contents, count the number of shots and doses, my chest grows tight.

Doctors Learn Vaccine Risk

Posted on by
3

Struggling to understand how good doctors can advise parents to follow dangerous medical practises? Dr Moss, highly qualified practising physician, and Professor teaching young doctors, has a unique understanding.

Another doctor explains his viewpoint of the direction of our country, especially the medical system and the desire for total control. His childhood experience of being forced to flee from Vietnam gives him insight into the direction of medical care and practice in this country.

Thank you to the Vaxxed Team for their tireless collection of real life stories of vaccine injury and awakening to the truth.

Dr Neides from Ohio was fired after writing a blog post in which he explains his adverse reaction to a flu vaccine and began asking questions about vaccine safety. The way he was treated by the medical establishment launched him into a detailed investigation of the history and safety of vaccines. In this segment of his talk, he makes 8 specific points regarding why he now questions vaccines.

Dr Neides warns us that Pharma is now racing to bring 140 new vaccines to the public. In many states there are campaigns to mandate vaccines for school attendance, as was passed by California in 2015. What are you doing to learn and share the truth?

What is your story?

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 23 years Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety.