Confessions of a zombie nurse. Here is a riveting interview with a self confessed zombie nurse. She admits to being so programmed it took personal experience of multiple injuries over many years before she finally made the connection to exactly what impact vaccines had on her own health. Unfortunately her awakening did not happen until after her first son developed autism.
Jennifer Walter’s raw honesty is incredibly helpful. She is an amazing activist NOW, but her story will help you understand the ‘pro shot mania’ clearly seen in other medical professionals who obviously care about children, but are unable to SEE the harm – even when it is right in front of their eyes.
Jennifer is now an autism recovery consultant and extremely vocal about educating parents on the harm of vaccines and what can be done about it. She is a breath of fresh air: once blind, she now sees. She is not keeping this news to herself, but wants every parent to 1) understand the harm caused by vaccines, Rhogam shots during pregnancy, and vitamin K shots at birth; and 2) help parents recover their children from the toxic impact of these injections.
Journeyboost is authored and maintained by Becky Hastings in the hope of assisting parents and others to make wise decisions for the health and future of their families. Please find much more vaccine information starting here.
CDC has set up an Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice. ACIP has no idea if it is safe to give multiple vaccines at once – because no study has been done. Yet for decades the members of ACIP have added vaccines. They publish recommendations that take for granted giving multiple vaccines at the same time. They advise doctors to give multiple vaccines with different antigens and different adjuvants injected into babies and children. Their caution? Just inject into different limbs – everything is fine.
Please watch this very brief exchange at an ACIP meeting where a new Hepatitis B vaccine with a new adjuvant is being added to the schedule. Do the two women guiding this meeting seem to be competent to answer difficult scientific questions on vaccine safety? I personally find this exchange very disturbing.
The CDC website and vocal vaccine promoters insist that the science has been settled and there is no connection between vaccines and autism. Yet Dr Bernadine Healy, a cardiologist, academic physician, and the first female Director of the National Institutes of Health, expressed a very different picture of the science stating “The question of autism and vaccines has not been answered.”
Dr Stanley Plotkin admitted in a deposition that there has been no study into the possible correlation between autism and the DTaP vaccine. In fact, there has only been one serious study of autism and vaccines which involved only one vaccine, the MMR. This is the study that the CDC whistleblower, Dr William Thompson, a senior research scientist at CDC, admitted the entire team committed scientific fraud. Vaxxed: from Cover-Up to Catastrophe is a detailed expose of the facts surrounding the whistleblower’s revelations.
So how safe are those vaccines which are daily being injected into our babies and children?
No one actually knows. Do you trust the giddy scientists that rely on – “well we always do it, just make sure you inject into different limbs” approach to safety? Or does approach seem more like relying on folklore? What is the true scientific approach? Science is always verifiable and repeatable. Science is never settled.
Journeyboost is authored and maintained by Becky Hastings in the hope of assisting parents and others make wise decisions for the health and future of their families. Please find much more vaccine information starting here.
The forces promoting vaccines are ramping up their efforts and targeting children. Many of these children may have been spared from vaccine injury by their concerned parents. Some of them may have experienced a severe reaction to vaccines in early childhood giving parents reason to not continue vaccinating. Yet authorities are seeking to encourage these children to go behind their parents backs and find a way to get themselves vaccinated.
Forewarned is forearmed. Parents who have researched the true risk of vaccines need to take the next step and educate their children on the reliability of this information. This process can provide challenges because a child naturally trusts and they will have to choose whether to trust their parents or trust the authorities trying to lead them.
Imagine if your teen was having a severe reaction to a vaccine they received without your knowledge or consent and wouldn’t tell you about it.
The article gives the expectation that a vaccine is going to give you a reaction and you won’t feel good, yet says that is the way the vaccine works.
What do you think? What are some of the best strategies to help our children recognize truth?
Becky Hastings, passionate about Jesus, health, family, truth and healing foods.
There are some ‘scientific’ studies vaccine proponents can produce that may convince you there is no relationship between vaccines and SIDS, autism, and a host of other conditions listed on vaccine package inserts.
If these ‘studies’ are indeed 100% accurate, I wonder why the CDC won’t allow independent scientists access to the VSD (vaccine safety data link) started in 1990 to monitor the safety of vaccines?
I also question the loyalty of all employees producing such ‘science’ from the CDC and all members of the ACIP that make vaccine recommendations which impact millions worldwide.
If the vaccine industry is squeaky clean, why are the manufacturers indemnified from all harm their product may cause?
Why did the US Supreme Court rule in 2011 that “vaccines are unavoidably unsafe”? Why has the VICP become an aggressively difficult closed court instead of the quick recompense it was initially set up for?
Why did CDC ghost all the researchers from Harvard whom they had commissioned to research the accuracy of the VAERS data base and whom they had paid over a million dollars?
Why are government agencies which promote and protect vaccines attacking innocent parents instead of doing the safety studies and tracking vaccines using true placebos controls – the same way all other drugs are approved for use? Why has the entire schedule never been tested for safety?
Why is the character of those asking questions the primary target of those who endorse and profit from vaccines?
Why are top specialists in aluminum, stem cells, and toxicology, with no vested interested in the industry, summarily ignored or denounced?
So many questions. So few answers. So little rational conversation is happening on this topic. Why?
I don’t have all the answers. Parents need to know there are a LOT of questions. Please watch Vaxxed 2. This movie clearly demonstrates that there is a great deal of harm from vaccines that the ‘experts’ seem determined to ignore. The Vaxxed Team collected over 7,000 signatures on the bus used to travel the country and collect these stories on video. Real people who put real trust in vaccines until they realized the harm inflicted on their children. Don’t be ignorant or silent anymore.
Watch the original Vaxxed: From Cover-Up To Catastrophe to understand how this groundswell of families was created. An avalanche of human suffering uncovered.
Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, writes for the love of health, babies and Jesus.
Most people are unaware, but something significant changed when Obama signed the Affordable Care Act into law in 2010. Nurses in hospitals are now required to ask every single patient upon arrival – for any and all reasons – if they have had a flu vaccine already this year (September – March) or a pneumococcal vaccine. If they report that they have not received these vaccines, it will be noted in the computer records and an order will automatically be generated to give the patient these vaccines. No doctor is consulted. It is the “Standard of Care” hospital policy. Since the CDC and most state Health Departments recommend flu shots yearly for all ages, this impacts everyone. Pneumococcal vaccines are promoted to those over the age of 65 and may also be offered to babies/young children since the CDC includes them in their recommendations. If you are at the hospital for elective surgery, a broken limb, or anything else, you will be targeted to get those vaccines.
How do you protect yourself?
Never sign an electronic signature pad when admitted to a hospital – the information in these ‘forms’ include giving permission for the administration of “biologics” which means you have just signed permission to be injected with vaccines.
Ask for a paper copy. Write clearly “No Biologics” and “No Vaccines” above your signature. I have heard of patients being told they cannot provide paper copies. In this instance you may continue to refuse to sign the electronic signature pad and see what they are able to come up with.
Some people aren’t willing to take any chances and suggest using a Sharpie permanent marker to write on both arms before elective surgery: “No Biologics” and “No Vaccines” so the nurse will have no doubt of your refusal! There have been too many cases of a nurse ‘forgetting’ or giving vaccines even after refusal. Take a photo of it written on your body – as proof of refusal!
The view point of most hospital facilities is that even if
someone already received a flu vaccine earlier in the season, or if their
vaccine status is “unknown” IT WON’T HURT TO BE VACCINATED TWICE. So, if you
are admitted to the hospital and you can’t remember if you have had a flu shot
this season, as long as you don’t refuse, you will get a flu shot on admission.
Nurses can also get permission from family members and give flu shots while the
patient is recovering from surgery.
It’s important that you make sure every family member knows
your desire to avoid all vaccines.
Also, patients admitted for trauma will get a TDaP in the ER
when they arrive UNLESS THE PATIENT OR THE FAMILY REFUSES at the time of the
trauma. Hospital “standard of care” policy for nearly all injuries, especially
those with a point of entry, is to order a TDaP/DTaP (depending on the age). So
even if you cut your hand washing dishes in soapy water, expect to be offered a
TDaP.
Vaccination is nurse driven. Hospital policy dictates that
nurses should be vigilant in regards to vaccines for all admissions. They are
instructed to assess vaccination status of all patients admitted to hospital.
The guideline used is that ALL PATIENTS GET A FLU SHOT on the second day in the
hospital from September – March (sometimes longer). Vaccines will be
administered unless REFUSED by the patient.
The key is that THE PATIENT HAS THE RIGHT TO REFUSE. But sometimes it requires extreme vigilance to exercise your right!
Smart doctors, smart nurses, and informed humans all REFUSE flu vaccines. Read the story of how one smart doctor figured out – after 3 years of getting sick after flu vaccines – that it was time to do some REAL RESEARCH. The information she found out after contacting the CDC flu division is profound. Flu vaccines don’t work. The CDC admits it.
Becky Hastings, passionate about Jesus, health, family, truth and healing foods. Wife, mother, grandmother, life and health coach.
Please share your experience in the comments! Thanks
Every parent wants the best for their baby. No rational parent seeks to harm their infant. The tragic death of Evee Gayle Clobes reminds us that not all babies can safely receive the one-size-fits-all vaccine schedule.
Catie Clobes describes how she missed the warning signs after each round of vaccines Evee received. The signs of adverse impact on Evee are clear in hindsight, yet Catie was given no information on what to look for. She trusted the CDC schedule recommended by her doctor. Evee tragically died 36 hours after her 6 months shots. Like many parents, Catie didn’t make the connection when it was right in front of her eyes. Please don’t ignore the warning signs. If you know anyone that continues to give vaccines, at least share this information so they can be aware of the signs.
Here is an introduction to the very short life of Evee Gayle Clobes:
“On Wednesday, February 27, 2019, Catie Clobes of Howard Lake, Minnesota brought her happy, healthy, well-developed 6-month-old baby girl Evee Gayle Clobes to her well-baby checkup, whereupon the pediatrician declared her to be in “perfect health” with no problems or concerns. After Evee was examined by her pediatrician, the nurse administered her shots according to the CDC recommended schedule – 6 doses total, via Pediarix and Prevnar.”
Science is clear that there are risks to the many routine procedures performed on babies as a “standard of care” practice in the USA and many other countries.
“…vitamin K aims at rapid lowering of the international normalized ratio (INR) into a safe range to reduce the risk of major bleeding and therefore improving patient outcome without exposing the patient to the risk of thromboembolism due to overcorrection…” (Evee’s levels were sensitive to being “overcorrected”.) American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs https://link.springer.com/article/10.2165/00129784-200404010-00005
“Parenteral vitamin K1 (phytonadione) is used for anticoagulant reversal, and a boxed warning exists with intravenous and intramuscular administration due to the possibility of severe reactions, including fatalities. These reactions resemble hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis, including anaphylactoid reaction, and have led to shock and cardiac and/or respiratory arrest.” https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1076029616674825
Cardiorespiratory
The title of a study from 2007 makes it clear that there are adverse impacts: “Primary Immunization of Premature Infants with Gestational Age <35 Weeks: Cardiorespiratory Complications and C-Reactive Protein Responses Associated with Administration of Single and Multiple Separate Vaccines Simultaneously.”
16% of infants in the study experienced immunization-related cardiorespiratory events, and 11% required oxygen therapy.
“…infants were asymptomatic before immunization but had episodes of apnea, bradycardia, or [oxygen] desaturation after immunization…”
“[Cardiorespiratory event] level is expected to be elevated in the 48 hours following immunization. In a minority of infants immunized, cardiorespiratory events were associated with presumed need for intervention.” https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022347607001850
“Possible Predictors of Cardiorespiratory Events after Immunization in Preterm Neonates.” Neonatology, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 2013, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/23887711/
“Motor Palsies of Cranial Nerves (Excluding VII) after Vaccination: Reports to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.” Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, Landes Bioscience, 2014, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4185907/.
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)
Simultaneous sudden infant death (SIDS) syndrome. “Twin girls (3.5-month-old) were found dead by their mother in their crib, both in supine position. The infants were identical twins and delivered at a hospital by cesarean section. Both infants were healthy and did not have any serious medical history. Two days prior to the incident, the twins had received the second dose of oral polio, DPT and the first dose of hepatitis B vaccines and they had fever on the first day of the vaccination and been given teaspoonful of acetaminophen.” “Simultaneous Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.” Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Feb. 2007, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/17654772/
Vaccines currently recommended/mandated for school attendance: • Tetanus: a disease that that is non contagious; • Hepatitis B: a disease not spread easily in a school setting and for which children with active cases of Hepatitis B are allowed to attend school; • Pertussis, Diphtheria, Polio: diseases for which the vaccine is not capable of preventing transmission of infection; • Rubella: a vaccine that has never been studied for clinical effectiveness; • Mumps: a vaccine not efficacious enough to impart the required threshold of herd immunity; • Measles: a vaccine not durable enough to ensure long-term protection of the majority of vaccinated students from developing a modified form of the disease; • Chickenpox: a vaccine not utilized by other developed countries for mass vaccination.
If you look at it this way you see how unreasonable this policy is. The current CDC vaccine policy is not grounded in medical ethics, is not grounded in understanding of what vaccines can and cannot achieve, and cannot be claimed to be founded on ‘science’. Vaccine education currently discounts inconvenient FACTS and protects a multi billion-dollar industry peddling a liability free product. Why?
In this talk Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD uses the CDC’s own studies and other accepted peer reviewed scientific data sources to prove these claims.
Posted by Becky Hastings in the interests of education for parents.
You might have heard this response from someone seeking to rationalize giving vaccines “It’s a gamble every time you get in the car with your children. In fact, car accidents are the leading cause of accidental death for children. Do you plan to stop driving them? Considering cars are 1000 times more dangerous than vaccines, I sure hope so.”
If the car seat and car makers were given immunity from lawsuits and no safety testing had been done for 30 years, then your comparison would be more accurate. Over $4 billion has been paid to compensate vaccine injury & death since 1989. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), charged by Congress with safety testing, recently admitted it has done NONE. No vaccines have been tracked for safety since the companies manufacturing them were given indemnity!! NO combination of vaccines recommended to babies and children have ever been tested for safety – even though we know that multiple drugs can have an overall negative impact. Vaccines are a far bigger gamble than you were told.
Influence of pediatric vaccines on amygdala growth and opioid ligand binding in rhesus macaque infants: A pilot study.Hewitson L1, Lopresti BJ, Stott C, Mason NS, Tomko J. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20628439
Parents, please research vaccines as if your babies life depends on it. Not all babies can safely receive vaccines as currently recommended by your doctor and the CDC.
The Highwire’s ‘Ex-Vax Files’ Series highlights Catie Clobes, mother of three. Catie followed the #CDC’s recommendations, listened to her pediatrician, and less than 48 hours after her 6-month-old daughter Evee’s vaccinations, lost her baby. Refusing to accept a SIDS diagnosis, Catie shares her heart wrenching journey from “pro-vaxxer” to “ex-vaxxer.”
“It’s a sad day for California. And it’s a sad day for our country.”
To the democrats holding office in California: “Why in the world did any of you get into politics if it wasn’t about protecting children?”
Did you see any news reports of Robert Kennedy Jr’s Occupy Sacramento Press Conference on 9 September 2019? The legislative bodies suspended rules to rush through two bills (SB276 & SB714) despite thousands of concerned parents who showed up at the capitol to express strong protest against these bills. Some highlights from Bobbie Kennedy’s speech:
“If we can give government and big industry the right to inject untested medical products with zero liability into our children coercively, where does the power of government end? What else can they order us to do? Abort babies for the good of society? Euthanize people for the good of society? Where is the legal rational boundary? Our country has signed multiple treaties stating that force cannot be used for any medical procedures without informed consent.
“Where are all the auto-immune diseases coming from? If it’s not the vaccines, where is it coming from 12% of my generation had chronic diseases (prior to 1986). Today 54% do. From HHS. The long list of epidemic chronic diseases amongst American children are also listed on the vaccine inserts.
“All of these legislatures here – we went from office to office and talked to every single one of them. We answered every single question. We showed them in black and white the truth. This state is doing something horrendous.
“Environmental issues. A war between large corporations who are trying to treat our planet as if it is a business in liquidation, convert our natural resources to cash, have a few years of pollution based prosperity for themselves and our children are going to have to pay for their joy ride with de-nuded landscapes, poor health, and huge clean up costs which are going to amplify over time and they will never be able to pay. That was my life’s battle. These corporations were commoditizing our landscapes.
“When I got sucked into this issue I saw something a 100 times worse. Not just oil companies trying to pave and commoditize our landscape, but big pharmaceutical companies – the most evil companies on earth – who are commoditizing our children. Who are giving our children this tsunami of chronic diseases and then making money. Telling us they are getting rid of infectious diseases like measles and chicken pox, but trading that for rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes and autism and ADD and ADHD. All of those infectious diseases are treatable and curable yet none of the chronic diseases that they are causing are treatable or curable. They are making $50B selling our kids these mandated vaccines that are untested and liability free, but they are making $500B a year selling them the epi-pens, the seizure medications, the Prozac, the Albuterol inhalers, the rheumatoid arthritis medications, the diabetes medications, that our children are addicted to for life because of these vaccines.
And we went through this with all of these democratic legislators. They knew what they were doing.
A Q&A by David Maxfield from Crucial Skills: How to discuss immunizations with reluctant parents inspired me to write my own Q&A. I have a high regard for their work even though I hold an opposing view on this particular topic. His answer to a question posed by a vaccine promoting health care professional provides valuable insight on how to converse instead of argue. I pose a question from a vaccine informed parent and edited the wording he provided in his answer. If you visit the link please read my comment, and take a minute to leave your own respectful comment!
Dear David,
With the recent rise of hype in the media promoting vaccines and looming mandates, I am concerned children will be harmed as a result.
With 36 yrs exploring this topic, I am troubled by how many ‘experts’ are not more curious about vaccine safety. Has the belief that “vaccines are safe & effective & save millions of lives” been challenged with personal research review by those who hold this view? I don’t understand how they can push a point of view without a thorough examination of what exactly parents are objecting to and why. Parents who witness injury know the case for vaccines is extremely flawed. Many have become experts on vaccine risk, yet may find it difficult to hold a conversation because of their passion.
Public health officials seem more committed to getting vaccines into children than looking into the possible harm. How can I converse about this topic so that all parties involved can discover truth?
Concerned mother, grandmother, researcher, and writer
Dear concerned mother, grandmother, researcher, and writer,
It’s not just vaccines that cause communication breakdowns. We see breakdowns across our culture, which makes your question especially relevant. Some tips that may help your discussions:
You Can’t Win an Argument. It’s a paradox that it becomes harder, instead of easier, to convince someone when you are supremely confident in your own point of view. Many of us have firsthand experience with this reality. Dale Carnegie expanded this insight, “You can’t win an argument.” Here is how a conversation can turn into an argument:
I ask the parent/doctor/nurse why they want to give vaccines or question a vaccine promoter about vaccines.
Reasons are given in support of vaccines.
I attack their reasons and try to add information on vaccine harm.
They attack my points and defend theirs.
I attack theirs and defend mine.
Rinse and repeat.
No one wins
In trying to win an argument I’ve fallen into what’s called the Persuasion Trap. I have become the champion for my cause and pushed the other party into being a champion for the opposite cause. The result is an argumentative cycle no one seems to win – in fact, each person could finish with a strengthened view of his or her own position.
Motivational Interviewing. Motivational Interviewing is an approach that is designed to avoid the Persuasion Trap. Instead of taking sides, it helps the pro vaccine pusher explore and resolve the ambivalence they must feel regarding vaccines. It conveys respect while maintaining and holding the position that it’s the parent who will make the final judgment. The goal is to engage the vaccine promoter with his or her own intrinsic motivation. Below are a few principles you can use:
Ask for Permission. When you are told “It’s time for vaccines” or someone is providing pressure for you to give vaccines, don’t launch into an argument. Instead, ask permission to discuss it further. This helps avoid an argument and conveys respect.
Explore their Ambivalence. Most thoughtful experienced vaccine promoters must have some thoughts about the reality of vaccine injury. Make it safe for them to voice their possibly deeply hidden concerns. This establishes your role as educator, rather than opponent. Below are how these first two elements might sound in a conversation with a healthcare provider. You can imagine using a similar approach for family or friends:
YOU: Your said my child is due for a _____ vaccine today. Would it be okay if we discussed it?
PARENT: [I have no idea what they will say! Let’s go with] Okay.
YOU: Many of your peers feel vaccines are entirely safe and totally effective. Your training has launched your career as a health care provider and you see that vaccines play an integral part of providing that care. You are concerned about parents who refuse vaccines and worried that it will cause specific risk to that child and perhaps to a larger population because of one child not receiving vaccines. These are valid concerns. If I were in your shoes, I would probably share your views. What do you see as the pros and cons of a person not getting vaccines?
Perhaps draw a line down the middle of a piece of paper and write the pros on the left and cons on the right side of the line as they provide them. This helps the person turn their vague feelings and fears into a finite number of specific concerns—concerns that can be addressed.
Paraphrase to Ensure Understanding. Summarize each concern. This makes sure you understand it and also demonstrates that you are listening. “So, correct me if I’m wrong, but you are worried that a child who does not receive a measles vaccine will be at risk of death? You are concerned that if a few children don’t get the measles vaccine a widespread outbreak will result in many people getting sick and perhaps many dying? You have concerns that parents do not understand the gravity of their decision to avoid vaccines and that they are unnecessarily putting their child at risk? Is that right?”
Address Each Concern with Facts. But first, ask for permission (again), “Would you mind if I provided you with more information about the risk of vaccine injury from recently published sources?” Have a few salient facts memorized and offer to send the papers. Provide all clarifying information in a nonjudgmental way.
Consider the Messenger. Ask yourself whether you are the right person to provide the facts. If you are a parent who has personally witnessed vaccine injury, a person who has received compensation through VICP, or a person who has spent thousands of hours researching the topic, you may consider yourself credible, but beware that your listener may not see you as credible. A health professional will generally value information provided by other health professionals. If you have had multiple children and some are vaccine injured and others who did not receive vaccines are vibrantly healthy, you may want to share your own personal observations. It might sound like this: I understand my small data sample is not science, but after my first child was vaccine injured I didn’t give vaccines to my others. The thing that astounds me every single day is the vibrant health of my non vaccinated children. I am absolutely certain that health is not the result of getting an injection of so many chemicals on a regular basis.”
If you don’t think the person sees you as a credible messenger, then use information that comes from more credible sources. Provide a handout from Learn the Risk, Informed Consent Action Network, Children’s Health Defense, or NVIC. You may also encourage the person to investigate recent studies by Dr Aaby on long-term health after vaccines, Dr Theresa Deisher on DNA fragments in vaccines, or Dr Chris Exley and Dr Chris Shaw on aluminum in vaccines. Another resource for someone truly interested in exploring the topic is a video presentation by Dr Sam Eggertsen from Washington state focused on helping health care providers understand vaccine hesitant parents which answers the question “Why Do Parents Refuse To Vaccinate Their Children?” https://youtu.be/8LB-3xkeDAE
Final Affirmation/Acknowledgement. “I applaud you for having this discussion with me. I am happy to discuss anything further. I’m sure I don’t know as much as you. I don’t have your training and haven’t read all your medical textbooks, but I am 100% committed to finding the truth. I also want to help parents have healthy happy babies – which I am sure is also your goal. I believe we achieve the best health, as individuals and as communities, by boosting the innate immune system and the body’s own defense against infectious disease. Avoiding chemicals in our food, air, water, and what we inject into our body – all of which burden our natural detox system – seems a wise approach in the pursuit of health.”
Consider Multiple Influences. You asked how to have a conversation with a vaccine promoter. These conversations are important, but they’re only one aspect of a comprehensive influence strategy. If your mission is to inform the public and especially new parents of the reality of vaccine injury you could employ a combination of strategies at the Personal, Social, and Structural levels. These would include conversations, but also involve community leaders within schools, churches, and sports teams. They would also include discussions with lawmakers and policy makers. I pray this information will be helpful in getting people to thoroughly investigate the truth on this issue. Let me know if you try any of these suggestions, and how they work for you!
