Category Archives: Measles

Stop ALL childhood vaccines?

Posted on by
1

I was thrilled to hear Dr Peter McCullough – a thoroughly mainstream cardiologist prior to the great covid reveal thrust upon the world beginning in 2020 – advise parents to forego all childhood vaccines.

This a a great step forward for medical professionals to be able to discuss the conflicts of interest long-held by regulatory bodies. The entire Covid event has overwhelmingly showed the world that there is a problem with vaccines, the regulatory bodies, and the companies that manufacture them. These facts have caused many extremely reputable doctors, like Dr Peter McCullough, to investigate the actual safety studies supporting the entire vaccine industry.

 It’s a wake up call.

“Growing international concerns about vaccine regulatory processes and vaccine safety have emerged following the widespread regulatory failure of Covid-19 vaccines. The Covid-19 crisis has demonstrated that regulatory bodies, once public watchdogs, are now at best incompetent and at worst have been deeply corrupted by pharmaceutical industry interests.”

You can read the well formulated statement by the World Council for Health here. You can watch the interview with Dr Peter McCullough and Dr Tess Lawrie here. Both doctors agree that ALL childhood vaccines should be halted. Dr McCullough is clearly NOT an ‘anti-vaxxer’ as he considers himself like a pin cushion – having received 69 vaccines in his life, including 40 flu vaccines! I don’t think he’ll be getting any more vaccines for himself.

https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/health-revolutionary
https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/a-common-sense-approach-to-childhood

Now many may say – ‘but who is the World Council of Health?’ You can expect that they will be attacked. But can anyone provide coherent arguments against their statement? All personal attacks are signals that there is no logical way to debate; no rationale to support their ideas, so they attack their opponents.

There have been many hundreds of doctors who have spoken out revealing the dangers of vaccines, but there is a huge tide overflowing to a greater number than ever before AND giving those who have researched the topic for many years ever greater validity.

A big win for truth. Let everyone you know with children, or soon to have children. You can bet this will not be on the news!

Becky Hastings collects information on health and tries her best to discover and share truth. By God’s grace, through Jesus Christ, I was saved, blessed with a husband of over 40 years, and five precious babies all grown up. I now get to delight as ten grandchildren grow! Together we can help each other discover a healthy path in this crazy upside down world.

36 by 15 months?

Posted on by
Reply
A picture of a baby edited with needles sticking into it, illustrating how many shots a baby receives.
Evee Clobes

The CDC schedule is clear. Add them up for yourself. They want every child to receive 36 doses targeting 15 different diseases by the age of 15 months — in the hope that these injections will prevent illness in your baby. But, will following this recommendation produce a healthy baby?

I can’t show the entire schedule at once because it is so large, but take a look at this segment!

Birth to 15 months vaccine schedule published by CDC

To inspect the entire schedule, as published by the CDC, go here.

Please note that the number, 36, is reached by

  • counting the DPaT and MMR as THREE because both of these shots contain 3 different concoctions added together.
  • does not include the number of injections recommended by the CDC for children in the hope of preventing influenza (aka flu). If you accept all of those (most parents do not) add three for a total of 39 by 15 months. After that, the recommendation is for an additional shot each and every year.
  • This chart only shows injections recommended up to the age of 15 months. There are plenty more the CDC recommends to get after that time. For the next portion of recommendations, go to this link and scroll down.
skeptical baby

Studying this schedule creates many questions in my mind. How did children survive before receiving such a barrage of shots? Prior to 1986 there were far less shots being promoted. See the following chart comparing shots given in s1962, 1983 and 2018.

Doses of Vaccines for US Children from Birth - 18 years

Another important question – and one that should be OBVIOUS: Has anyone ever studied in detail how this combination of shots will impact a baby? Has each shot added been tracked and followed in its entirety since it is given in combination with so many others? Searching for this information on-line has become challenging. Every search I tried brought me to yet another page by the CDC. The following diagram shows that the testing of every vaccine is based on the assumed safety of a vaccine that was older. Each vaccine added was not tested against a true placebo, but was tested against an older vaccine. When challenged by ICANdecide.org the CDC was unable to produce any safety trials showing that vaccines were tested by a true placebo. Additionally, CDC was unable to produce any evidence that the entire combination schedule of shots had been tested and proven to be safe.

Placebo Pyramid Scheme
‘Safety’ trials for all the vaccines added to the schedule built on supposed safety of previous shots

Another critically important question: Has the total amount of aluminum and other potential neurotoxins been considered in this bloated schedule? Aluminum is just one of the ingredients. There is no evidence of safety of aluminum in shots because it has never been tested for safety. Aluminum has been added to vaccines because it enhances the body’s response. It is called an adjuvant. From early days it that has been “GRAS” meaning, generally regarded as safe, despite no testing or evidence to support this categorization.

And finally, as a parent that is most concerned about a healthy happy baby who grows up to be a healthy teen and adult: Has there ever been a longterm thorough study of fully vaccinated, partially vaccinated and non vaccinated children in regards to total health outcomes? Does accepting the vaccine schedule by the CDC lead to a longer, healthier life? Since we live in a time with skyrocketing allergies, neurologic disabilities of many types, and other serious health issues in childhood, this is a vitally important question to consider. It would be very easy for the CDC to do such a study — if they truly wanted to know the results.

Here is an idea to consider. If I offer you a milkshake — in your favorite flavor — how many rat turds can I put into it before you will reject it? If I put in one rat turd, and you can easily remove it with a spoon, will you still drink the milkshake? What about a handful of rat turds, mixed around? At what point will you refuse the milkshake?

Delicious milkshake

The milkshake represents the CDCs credibility. Maybe they made a couple mistakes in the past. But how can they continue to recommend so many shots TO HEALTHY BABIES to this day? If any of their recommendations cannot stand — and the Hepatitis B shot for newborns is a great example – can I trust ANY of their recommendations?

You decide. Your baby’s health is in your hands. The most important part of your baby to protect is their brain.

Becky Hastings collects information on health and tries her best to discover and share truth. By God’s grace, through Jesus Christ, I was saved, blessed with a husband of over 40 years, and five precious babies all grown up. I now get to delight as ten grandchildren grow! Together we can help each other discover a healthy path in this crazy upside down world.

Buyer Beware

Posted on by
Reply

Have I been impacted by LIES?

If car seats had warnings about causing my child encephalitis, anaphylactic shock, SIDS, febrile seizures, chronic illness, lifelong neurological impairment, etc., I wouldn’t use them.

If my doctor told me to use the same car seat for newborns, toddlers, older children and adults, regardless of size or medical status, I would remember we don’t treat other products or medications as one-size-fits-all and I wouldn’t try to put an infant into a seat too large for an adult.

If my doctor said the exact compilation of harnesses, the direction the car seat is facing, and the type of car it fits into, all make the car seat not only safe and effective but necessary to prevent death, and then I found out they’ve NEVER studied the multiple factors together, AND that the car seat manufacturers had no liability WHATSOEVER for their products, I would question the knowledge and loyalties of my doctor and not follow the recommendation.

If I asked for more information on the car seat and my doctor gave me two pages that said the car seat works great, but failed to give me the full data sheets that showed the car seats were actually quite dangerous, haven’t been studied in babies, and have contraindications in many of the groups doctors use them in, I would at the very least find a new doctor.

If I knew the U.S. Supreme Court clearly declared car seats ‘unavoidably unsafe’ I would wonder why they aren’t making car seat manufacturers accountable for injuries and death, and I certainly wouldn’t make usage mandatory.

If I knew car seat manufacturer whistleblowers had come forward to expose data manipulation that implicated the manufacturers and the government agencies that recommended them, I wouldn’t use them and I’d call for a federal investigation rather than allowing the complicit parties to ‘investigate’ themselves.

If car seat ads accounted for 85% of mainstream media ad revenue, I would understand that they can’t be impartial with their reporting, I wouldn’t blindly trust their recommendations, and I would question all information supplied by mainstream media.

If car seat manufacturers continually paid out billions in civil and criminal fines for manipulating safety data, injuring and killing people with their products, yet the products were not recalled, I wouldn’t use them.

If car seat manufacturers used aborted babies in their manufacturing process, I wouldn’t use them.

If car seats caused the accidents they were meant to protect against, I wouldn’t use them.

If my child had a worsening reaction and decline in health every time I put them in a car seat, I wouldn’t use them.

If my doctor got paid an additional $400 every time I used a car seat, couldn’t tell me anything specific about the car seat, and saw these negative reactions following car seat exposure, but said it was ‘just a coincidence’, I wouldn’t use them and I’d get a new doctor.

If the available car seats used ingredients and schedules that were​ banned in other safer/healthier countries, I wouldn’t use them.

If I knew that after using a car seat my child might seem fine at first, but that car seats may cause infertility, cancer, mutagenesis, neurological damage and autoimmune diseases, I wouldn’t use them.

If people who didn’t use car seats were consistently healthier, I would at least do my own research.

If we weren’t allowed to do actual thorough standard scientific tests for car seat safety or ask ANY questions about them, if all dissenting views on car seats are censored — even personal accounts from parents who are direct eye-witnesses to the car seat damage — but the public is still urged, coerced and/or forced to use them, I would think maybe I should do some digging for myself instead of blindly accepting the research of the companies profiting from products known to injure or kill and for which they face no liability at all.

You can bundle the healthiest ingredients with the best of intentions, wrap them in poison and they’re still just poison. When you make an extremely profitable product liability-free, the result is that there is no incentive to make sure the product is safe or effective.

Don’t exchange liberty for a fallacious sense of security, especially at the expense of our children.

Based on writing attributed to Kristi Miller

Becky Hastings collects information on health and tries her best to discover and share truth. By God’s grace, through Jesus Christ, I was saved, blessed with a husband of over 40 years, and five precious babies all grown up. I now get to delight as ten grandchildren grow! Together we can help each other discover a healthy path in this crazy upside down world.

A Different View of History

Posted on by
4

The history of vaccines that we have been presented through our general education is based on a foundation of “vaccines have saved millions of lives and are thoroughly tested, safe and effective.” Digging into actual historical accounts presents a completely different point of view. The people pushing the ‘acceptable vaccine narrative’ have either 1) never investigated the facts and are ignorant, or 2) they are focussed on profit (either directly or through their career choices) from a product that will harm many, but is liability free because of laws passed to protect the manufacturers. No doctor, educator, or vaccine manufacturer will ever be held responsibile or accountable for the information they share since vaccines were given government protection through the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. The following quote from Eleanor McBean gives an entirely different perspective on early vaccines:

The stricken soldiers would probably all have recovered if they had avoided doctors and their poison medication and suppressive methods. Unfortunately, they were sent to the army hospitals and drugged to death by the doctors, who know nothing about the true principles of health and natural healing. The doctors, then as well as now, mistake the symptoms for the disease and give drugs to suppress the symptoms instead of letting the internal healing mechanism do its work to bring about normalcy. The doctors think they must do something to bring down the fever and give certain drugs to stop the coughing and other drugs to stop the diarrhea. All these damaging medical methods block the elimination of poison waste, and death or permanent injury is the result.

After the heavy toll of lives, when they learned that all the tricks of medical science (?) had completely failed, the Army was resourceful enough to realize that they would have to give some attention to health measures if they were to survive as a living army. So they set up a rigorous regimen of hygiene, sanitation and improved nutrition. This sensible program reduced the incidence of typhoid to less than 3 cases per 1,000. This marked decline in disease was brought about in less than 10 years, from 1899 to 1908. And this was done without one injection of anti-typhoid vaccine being administered, or any other vaccine.

In contrast to this remarkable record of disease prevention, we find that after vaccination became compulsory in the Army in 1911, not only did typhoid increase rapidly, but all other vaccinal diseases increased at an alarming rate.


Swine Flue Expose, Chapter 3 by Eleanora I. McBean, Ph.D., N.D.

I encourage you to follow the link and read more of the information she provides.

No writer perfectly conveys historical truth, but by exposing ourselves to understanding the many facets of history, we will be better able to discern current events. Here is a list of the books written by Eleanor McBean. Many can be found on the internet for free.

Little known or investigated facts included in Vaccines the Biggest Medical Fraud in History (above):

Listed below are public health statistics (U.S. Public Health Reports) from the four states which adopted compulsory vaccination, and the figures from Los Angeles, California (similar results in other states available from books listed at the back of this booklet):

TENNESSEE

  • 1958: 119 cases of polio before compulsory shots
  • 1959: 386 cases of polio after compulsory shots

OHIO

  • 1958: 17 cases of polio before compulsory shots
  • 1959: 52 cases of polio after compulsory shots

CONNECTICUT

  • 1958: 45 cases of polio before compulsory shots
  • 1959: 123 cases of polio after compulsory shots

NORTH CAROLINA

  • 1958: 78 cases of polio before compulsory shots
  • 1959: 313 cases of polio after compulsory shots

LOS ANGELES

  • 1958: 89 cases of polio before shots
  • 1959: 190 cases of polio after shots

The decline of smallpox, as with many other infectious diseases, including diphtheria and scarlet fever, coincided with the sanitation reforms which were instituted in the late 1880s. Where obtainable, government health records from around the world showed that during the periods of the most intense and widespread vaccination, the incidence of and death rates from smallpox were highest. For instance, in Kansas City and Pittsburgh during the 1920s, lawsuits were initiated, and won, against doctors and medical societies for declaring smallpox epidemics when there were none, and for creating epidemics with their vaccination drives.

Before 1903, smallpox was almost unknown in the Philippines, with occurrences in less than 3% of the population, and that in a mild form. The U.S. military went in and began vaccinating, and by 1905 the Philippines had its first major epidemic. Vaccination was made compulsory in 1910. From 1905 to 1923, the mortality rate ranged from 25-75%, depending on the count from the various islands. “The mortality rate was the highest in the cities where vaccination was most intense.” Dr. W.W. Keen reported 130,264 cases and 74,369 deaths from smallpox in 1921.

Japan adopted compulsory vaccinations in 1872 when they had only a few cases of smallpox. By 1892 they had the largest smallpox epidemic in their history with 165,774 cases and 29,979 deaths.

Australia banned the smallpox vaccine after some children were killed by it, and in the following 15 years in unvaccinated Australia there were only 3 cases of smallpox.

The smallpox vaccine was discontinued in the United States after Dr. Henry Kempe reported to Congress in 1966 that fewer people were dying from the disease than from vaccination.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B085CBC263?binding=kindle_edition&ref_=dbs_s_ks_series_rwt_tkin&qid=1674315848&sr=1-1

Becky Hastings collects information on health and tries her best to discover and share truth. By God’s grace, through Jesus Christ, I was saved, blessed with a husband of over 40 years, and five precious babies all grown up. I now get to delight as ten grandchildren grow! Together we can help each other discover a healthy path in this crazy upside down world.

Calling for RATIONAL THOUGHT

Posted on by
1

Is the current vaccine policy rational?

Vaccines currently recommended/mandated for school attendance:
• Tetanus: a disease that that is non contagious;
• Hepatitis B: a disease not spread easily in a school setting and for which children with active cases of Hepatitis B are allowed to attend school;
• Pertussis, Diphtheria, Polio: diseases for which the vaccine is not capable of preventing transmission of infection;
• Rubella: a vaccine that has never been studied for clinical effectiveness;
• Mumps: a vaccine not efficacious enough to impart the required threshold of herd immunity;
• Measles: a vaccine not durable enough to ensure long-term protection of the majority of vaccinated students from developing a modified form of the disease;
• Chickenpox: a vaccine not utilized by other developed countries for mass vaccination.

If you look at it this way you see how unreasonable this policy is. The current CDC vaccine policy is not grounded in medical ethics, is not grounded in understanding of what vaccines can and cannot achieve, and cannot be claimed to be founded on ‘science’. Vaccine education currently discounts inconvenient FACTS and protects a multi billion-dollar industry peddling a liability free product. Why?

In this talk Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD uses the CDC’s own studies and other accepted peer reviewed scientific data sources to prove these claims.

Posted by Becky Hastings in the interests of education for parents.

Crucial Conversations

Posted on by
1

A Q&A by David Maxfield from Crucial Skills: How to discuss immunizations with reluctant parents inspired me to write my own Q&A. I have a high regard for their work even though I hold an opposing view on this particular topic. His answer to a question posed by a vaccine promoting health care professional provides valuable insight on how to converse instead of argue. I pose a question from a vaccine informed parent and edited the wording he provided in his answer. If you visit the link please read my comment, and take a minute to leave your own respectful comment!

Dear David, 

With the recent rise of hype in the media promoting vaccines and looming mandates, I am concerned children will be harmed as a result.

With 36 yrs exploring this topic, I am troubled by how many ‘experts’ are not more curious about vaccine safety. Has the belief that “vaccines are safe & effective & save millions of lives” been challenged with personal research review by those who hold this view? I don’t understand how they can push a point of view without a thorough examination of what exactly parents are objecting to and why. Parents who witness injury know the case for vaccines is extremely flawed. Many have become experts on vaccine risk, yet may find it difficult to hold a conversation because of their passion.

Public health officials seem more committed to getting vaccines into children than looking into the possible harm. How can I converse about this topic so that all parties involved can discover truth?

Concerned mother, grandmother, researcher, and writer

Dear concerned mother, grandmother, researcher, and writer,

It’s not just vaccines that cause communication breakdowns. We see breakdowns across our culture, which makes your question especially relevant. Some tips that may help your discussions:

You Can’t Win an Argument. It’s a paradox that it becomes harder, instead of easier, to convince someone when you are supremely confident in your own point of view. Many of us have firsthand experience with this reality. Dale Carnegie expanded this insight, “You can’t win an argument.” Here is how a conversation can turn into an argument:

  • I ask the parent/doctor/nurse why they want to give vaccines or question a vaccine promoter about vaccines.
  • Reasons are given in support of vaccines.
  • I attack their reasons and try to add information on vaccine harm.
  • They attack my points and defend theirs.
  • I attack theirs and defend mine.
  • Rinse and repeat.
  • No one wins

In trying to win an argument I’ve fallen into what’s called the Persuasion Trap. I have become the champion for my cause and pushed the other party into being a champion for the opposite cause. The result is an argumentative cycle no one seems to win – in fact, each person could finish with a strengthened view of his or her own position.

Motivational Interviewing. Motivational Interviewing is an approach that is designed to avoid the Persuasion Trap. Instead of taking sides, it helps the pro vaccine pusher explore and resolve the ambivalence they must feel regarding vaccines. It conveys respect while maintaining and holding the position that it’s the parent who will make the final judgment. The goal is to engage the vaccine promoter with his or her own intrinsic motivation. Below are a few principles you can use:

Ask for Permission. When you are told “It’s time for vaccines” or someone is providing pressure for you to give vaccines, don’t launch into an argument. Instead, ask permission to discuss it further. This helps avoid an argument and conveys respect. 

Explore their Ambivalence. Most thoughtful experienced vaccine promoters must have some thoughts about the reality of vaccine injury. Make it safe for them to voice their possibly deeply hidden concerns. This establishes your role as educator, rather than opponent. Below are how these first two elements might sound in a conversation with a healthcare provider. You can imagine using a similar approach for family or friends:

YOU: Your said my child is due for a _____ vaccine today. Would it be okay if we discussed it? 

PARENT: [I have no idea what they will say! Let’s go with] Okay. 

YOU: Many of your peers feel vaccines are entirely safe and totally effective. Your training has launched your career as a health care provider and you see that vaccines play an integral part of providing that care. You are concerned about parents who refuse vaccines and worried that it will cause specific risk to that child and perhaps to a larger population because of one child not receiving vaccines. These are valid concerns. If I were in your shoes, I would probably share your views. What do you see as the pros and cons of a person not getting vaccines? 

Perhaps draw a line down the middle of a piece of paper and write the pros on the left and cons on the right side of the line as they provide them. This helps the person turn their vague feelings and fears into a finite number of specific concerns—concerns that can be addressed.

Paraphrase to Ensure Understanding. Summarize each concern. This makes sure you understand it and also demonstrates that you are listening. “So, correct me if I’m wrong, but you are worried that a child who does not receive a measles vaccine will be at risk of death? You are concerned that if a few children don’t get the measles vaccine a widespread outbreak will result in many people getting sick and perhaps many dying? You have concerns that parents do not understand the gravity of their decision to avoid vaccines and that they are unnecessarily putting their child at risk? Is that right?”

Address Each Concern with Facts. But first, ask for permission (again), “Would you mind if I provided you with more information about the risk of vaccine injury from recently published sources?” Have a few salient facts memorized and offer to send the papers. Provide all clarifying information in a nonjudgmental way.

Consider the Messenger. Ask yourself whether you are the right person to provide the facts. If you are a parent who has personally witnessed vaccine injury, a person who has received compensation through VICP, or a person who has spent thousands of hours researching the topic, you may consider yourself credible, but beware that your listener may not see you as credible. A health professional will generally value information provided by other health professionals. If you have had multiple children and some are vaccine injured and others who did not receive vaccines are vibrantly healthy, you may want to share your own personal observations. It might sound like this: I understand my small data sample is not science, but after my first child was vaccine injured I didn’t give vaccines to my others. The thing that astounds me every single day is the vibrant health of my non vaccinated children. I am absolutely certain that health is not the result of getting an injection of so many chemicals on a regular basis.”

If you don’t think the person sees you as a credible messenger, then use information that comes from more credible sources. Provide a handout from Learn the Risk, Informed Consent Action Network, Children’s Health Defense, or NVIC. You may also encourage the person to investigate recent studies by Dr Aaby on long-term health after vaccines, Dr Theresa Deisher on DNA fragments in vaccines, or Dr Chris Exley and Dr Chris Shaw on aluminum in vaccines. Another resource for someone truly interested in exploring the topic is a video presentation by Dr Sam Eggertsen from Washington state focused on helping health care providers understand vaccine hesitant parents which answers the question “Why Do Parents Refuse To Vaccinate Their Children?” https://youtu.be/8LB-3xkeDAE

Final Affirmation/Acknowledgement. “I applaud you for having this discussion with me. I am happy to discuss anything further. I’m sure I don’t know as much as you. I don’t have your training and haven’t read all your medical textbooks, but I am 100% committed to finding the truth. I also want to help parents have healthy happy babies – which I am sure is also your goal. I believe we achieve the best health, as individuals and as communities, by boosting the innate immune system and the body’s own defense against infectious disease. Avoiding chemicals in our food, air, water, and what we inject into our body – all of which burden our natural detox system – seems a wise approach in the pursuit of health.”

Consider Multiple Influences. You asked how to have a conversation with a vaccine promoter. These conversations are important, but they’re only one aspect of a comprehensive influence strategy. If your mission is to inform the public and especially new parents of the reality of vaccine injury you could employ a combination of strategies at the Personal, Social, and Structural levels. These would include conversations, but also involve community leaders within schools, churches, and sports teams. They would also include discussions with lawmakers and policy makers. I pray this information will be helpful in getting people to thoroughly investigate the truth on this issue. Let me know if you try any of these suggestions, and how they work for you!

Best,

Vaccine Truth Seeker

Vaccine Ingredients

Posted on by
3

You’ve been told – probably many times – that vaccines are safe. So, what exactly is in that syringe being injected into the body of someone you love? Do you know? Does your doctor know? The following is a list directly from the CDC of the ingredients in all vaccines. The color coding will help you determine which vaccines contain human cell derivatives such as aborted fetal cell debris (including male and female DNA fragments), animal proteins, possible allergy irritants, and antibiotics.

Orange: Animal-derived 💗 Pink: Derived from humans cells 💛 Yellow: Toxic to humans 💚 Green: Allergy irritant 💙 Blue: Antibiotic

I always urge parents to double check all information – regardless of the source. Don’t believe me, but be sure to spend more time researching vaccines than you do any other item you may purchase for your baby – such as a car seat. Your baby’s health is too valuable to take any chances. Too many parents have learned the hard way that the risk of vaccines is actually quite high.

If you do decide your baby needs a vaccine, please research whether a Hepatitis B vaccine on the first day of life is a necessity for YOUR baby. Is YOUR baby truly at risk for Hepatitis B – an infection primarily shared through sexual promiscuity and the sharing of needles?

Before giving any vaccine at any time, take 3 minutes to read through these steps you can take prior to getting vaccines to help protect your baby. One of the biggest things you can do is to be aware that giving Tylenol (acetaminophen) in conjunction with vaccines greatly increases the risk of a vaccine reaction.

I have no vested interests in this topic. I write to educate and share information to empower parents to make wise choices for the life-long health and wellbeing of their family. Vaccine makers are 100% liability free. If their products cause any harm for any reason you cannot sue them or make any claim against them. Pause. Think about that.

Compiled by Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, health seeker and reporter. Seeking truth can be challenging, and sometimes confusing, but far more rewarding than staying ignorant!


Is Measles a Threat?

Posted on by
Reply

With all the measles hype, I needed to compile information so parents can have confidence in the decisions they make for their children.

Worried about Measles?

Did you know 10-13 people die each year from a falling vending machine?? 

Or, that 450 die each year by falling out of bed??

Your chances of dying of measles symptoms in America is miniscule. There has been less than 1 death per year from complications arising from a measles infection in the last 8 years.

Furthermore, in 1960 prior to the introduction of the measles vaccine, the rate of measles deaths in the US population of 179,300,000 was .0000021, hardly a threat.

If you have adequate Vitamin A, your chance of dying from a deficiency is ZERO.

A healthy well nourished baby/child with adequate vitamin A levels may contract measles, but it will result in a mild infection which will then provide life-long natural immunity. Even Dr Paul Offit had measles!

Watch this 8 minute video of “Measles Back in the Day” to understand how society viewed a measles infection.

Before the measles vaccine was introduced in 1963, even doctors and scientists considered measles to be a mild, mostly benign illness. Read a description of measles from 1959, published in the British Medical Journal.

Did you know that historically there has always been opposition to vaccines? Parents, please do your own research. Why is the media pushing us to fear a measles infection? Why are we not told about the risk of harm from the vaccine? Some groups of children are more susceptible to harm, yet the public is not informed. Find a list of Pubmed articles at the end of this blog showing measles autism associations. http://vaccinecommonsense.com/2016/03/15/back-in-the-1870s-this-battle-for-medical-freedom-is-ongoing/

Did you know that there is a wealth of scientific papers demonstrating that Vitamin A protects against measles and reduces the impact of the illness? A list is provided at the end of this blog. Studies also show that having a measles infection as a child can have a protective benefit against certain types of cancers.[1]

Amidst all the hype about the danger of measles, what is the message pushed on the public? GET YOUR VACCINE. Yet, very little to nothing is said about the real risk of vaccine injury. The following graphic illustrates the actual reports of injury and death in the USA from the MMR vaccines as reported to the VAERS – a system which is estimated by a Harvard study to receive between 1-10% of actual events occurring after vaccines. Compare these statistics to the risk of death from measles of .0000021.

To be fair, those who receive a MMR vaccine – which contains a live virus – may receive some immunity for a limited amount of time, but the immunity wanes requiring ‘booster’ vaccines. As the data from VAERS clearly demonstrates, there are many risks associated with the MMR, MMRII and ProQuad vaccines – all routinely given to our babies and children. There is a link to the Merck MMRII vaccine package insert at the end of this blog. I always encourage parents to read the complete vaccine package insert for any vaccine they are considering giving to their baby/child.

There are serious concerns about the human DNA fragments in the MMMR vaccine because the virus was grown using aborted human fetal cell lines. This is both an ethical, religious and medical concern. Other vaccines that contain human DNA fragment debris are Hepatitis A, varicella (chickenpox), Pentacel, Rubella, and shingles vaccines.

So what’s your best strategy to help your baby/child stay healthy and avoid a serious measles infection? Boost your immune system and pay attention to vitamin A!

Boost your natural sources of vitamin A like sweet potatoes, grass fed organic (if possible) liver, and other foods high in vitamin A.

We all want healthy babies. We need to be extremely careful that we are not deceived and fall into the traps of those who seek to profit from our children.

I’m 76. When I was a child, people knew what to do when someone got the measles. Stay calm, preferably in bed in a darkened room so your eyes wouldn’t be harmed. Definitely stay out of the sun – anyway that is what my parents and grandparents did with us. We all got measles. No harm at all came to any of us, to our cousins, or to our friends. J Storey

Compiled by Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, truth activist. Navigating health information can be confusing. Becky writes and speaks because of her faith in Jesus Christ and her desire to warn parents of potentially harmful modern medical recommendations. Becky receives no renumeration for this work! While there is a ‘donate’ button this website, it has yet to be tested!

[1] The Unreported Health Benefits of Measles http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/unreported-health-benefits-measles

A short list of papers on Vitamin A and measles infections:

Vitamin A reduces both morbidity and mortality in children 6mo – 5y
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/28282701/

Vitamin A reduces pneumonia symptoms in measles cases of Zambian children (2002)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/12468610/

Low vitamin A IMPACTS severity of measles – known since 1992. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/516043

Complication rates are increased by immune deficiency disorders, malnutrition, vitamin A deficiency (2004) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/15106083/

A 25 yo man with severe measles improved after IM vitamin A administration. Vitamin A deficiency is a known risk factor for measles. (2017)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/29390321/

A study from Africa showing vitamin A deficiency associated with increased mortality, with a greater effect in boys than in girls. (2012)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/22239846/

“Measles is a major cause of childhood morbidity and mortality. Vitamin A deficiency is a recognized risk factor for severe measles infections. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends administration of an oral dose of vitamin A (200,000 international units (IU), or 100,000 IU in infants) each day for two days to children with measles when they live in areas where vitamin A deficiency may be present…two doses were associated with a reduced risk of mortality and pneumonia-specific mortality in children under the age of two years.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16235283

Malnourished are most at risk for fatality from measles infectionshttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9345118

More information on the actual rate of measles http://vaxtruth.org/2012/01/measles-perspective/

Measles overviewhttps://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-diseases/measles/measles-detailed-overview.aspx

We hear repeatedly ‘there is no science that shows vaccines cause Autism’, yet we can read these government published studies which implicate vaccines as a cause of Autism:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878266/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377033
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24995277
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099159
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19106436
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3774468/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3697751/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21299355
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21907498
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11339848
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17674242
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15780490
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12933322
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16870260 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19043938
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12142947
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24675092
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25198681

Merck MMRII vaccine package insert https://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/m/mmr_ii/mmr_ii_pi.pdf

Babies Get Injections

Posted on by
Reply

These two graphics are published on a CDC website illustrating where to inject multiple vaccines to a baby at one visit.

A screen shot from Merck shows conflicting information:

The conflicts:

Point one says don’t use with other live virus vaccines, but give MMR one month before or after live viral vaccines. Varicella is a live virus vaccine. Point two contradicts point one: “MMR II has been administered concurrently with VARIVAX”… using separate injection sites and syringes – but no mention is made of safety tracking. Point four says the ACIP declares that simultaneous administration causes “no interference”. No mention is made of any study of the safety of giving all these vaccines at one time.

I did find an encouraging document linked on the same CDC link that addresses procedures to follow if there is a vaccine adverse reaction.

“These reactions can vary from trivial and inconvenient (e.g., soreness, itching) to severe and life threatening (e.g., anaphylaxis). Vaccine providers should be familiar with identifying immediate-type allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, and competent in treating these events at the time of vaccine administration. Providers should also have a plan in place to contact emergency medical services immediately in the event of a severe acute vaccine reaction.“

Parents, please research vaccines more than you research any other item or decision you make for your baby. All vaccine manufacturers have been given a liability free product. When their vaccine is added to CDC’s ACIP recommended shots for all babies and children, there is a LOT of money involved. If your baby/child experiences any vaccine reaction or death, you will bear the responsibility on your own. There is a cumbersome process to receive compensation through VICP which has paid $4 billion since 1988 to those injured or killed by vaccines. This represents a small fraction of the true harm vaccines have caused.

At the very least ask your vaccine provider if they have an emergency plan in place in the event of severe acute vaccine reaction. If they don’t have one, chances are, they lack information on administering vaccines and recognizing adverse reactions. If you do decide to give vaccines, please read this piece which has many helpful tips for reducing any potential reaction.

Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, avid reader, health promoter, and seeker of truth through Jesus Christ. Navigating health information can be confusing. Becky writes and speaks to educate parents on the anomalies and contradictions in many aspects of modern medical recommendations.

WHAT IS THE IMPACT of injecting human DNA into our BABIES???

Posted on by
8

In the previous blog conclusive evidence was presented showing that some vaccines contain residual human fetal cell material from the growth mediums used in vaccine manufacture. Most people are unaware that the shots they inject into babies contain fragments of cells from human babies, and some even deny that this is true.

Four significant vaccines on the CDC recommended schedule [1] all contain human fetal tissue fragments, including both male and female DNA:

  • M-M-R®II: exclusively available in the USA since 1979 targeting measles, mumps, and rubella; 2 doses at 12 months and 5 years. [2]
  • Varivax®: the vaccine aimed to prevent chicken pox, added to the schedule in 1996; 2 doses at 12 months and 5 years.
  • Hepatitis A vaccine, approved in 1996, and added to the schedule for all babies in 2005; 2 doses given between 12 and 24 months. [3]
  • Pentacel® combined vaccine targeting diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, polio, Haemophilus influenza type b (Hib), introduced in 2008. Four doses given at 2, 4, 6, and 15 months of age. [4]

The average baby is injected with 10 different human tissue-containing shots before they go to school. Eight of them before the age of two years. Surely such widespread use of this growth medium – human fetal cells – was thoroughly demonstrated to be safe – right?

Since 40 years have passed since the first vaccine containing human cell debris was introduced, there has been ample time to study how this vaccine containing human DNA fragments could be impacting those that are injected with it.

But, how much DNA is really in a vaccine? Isn’t it just infinitesimally small amounts?

DNA residuals in human fetal cell line manufactured vaccines

In addition to the ingredients listed on the package insert for Meruvax II® (rubella), we detected significant levels of human ssDNA (142 ± 8 ng/vial) as well as dsDNA (35 ±10 ng/vial) fragmented to ~215 base pairs in length. The MMR II® package insert discloses the presence of human fetal residuals [sic] [but not] how much cell substrate dsDNA or ssDNA contaminates each dose. In each vial of Havrix® [Hepatitis A vaccine], we detected ssDNA (301 ± 153 ng/vial) as well as dsDNA (44 ± 24 ng/vial) unfragmented residual DNA more than 48.5 K base pairs in length. The Havrix® package insert discloses the presence of human fetal cellular residuals from the MRC-5 cell line, but not the DNA contaminant levels specifically.[5]

The Varivax® vaccine [chicken pox] is manufactured using the human diploid cell line MRC5, and is contaminated with 2 micrograms of cell substrate double stranded DNA. Single stranded DNA levels are not reported in Merck’s Varivax Summary Basis for Approval document nor are the length of the DNA fragments contaminating the vaccine (Merck 2011). [5]

Vaccines that have been cultured on or manufactured using the WI-38 fetal cell line such as MeruvaxII®, MMRII®, Varivax®, Havrix® and Pentacel® are additionally contaminated with fragments of human endogenous retrovirus HERVK (Victoria et al., 2010). Recent evidence has shown that human endogenous retroviral transcripts are elevated in the brains of patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder (Frank et al., 2005), [5]

According to EPA recommendations, birth year change points for prevalence of autistic disorder should drive consideration of environmental triggers, as for any disease (McDonald 2010).[5]

Scientists have been studying and learning that injected “human fetal DNA fragments are inducers of autoimmune reactions, while both DNA fragments and retroviruses are known to potentiate genomic insertions and mutations (Yolken et al., 2000; Kurth 1998; U S Food and Drug Administration 2011).” [5]

How has injecting male and female DNA fragments into ALL babies impacted their health? 

A detailed analysis of the data available and has found startling results. There are statistically obvious change points associated with the addition of fetal cell line vaccines and increased diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: “Autistic disorder began to rise in the US after birth year 1978 (Newschaffer and Gurney 2005).” This corresponds to the introduction of the MMRII developed with two different fetal cell tissues. [5]

Additionally, “The US 1988.4 change point corresponded to the addition of a second dose of MMRII® to a measles vaccination campaign that increased compliance from ≤50 to 82% between birth years 1987 and 1989 (Centers for Disease Control 1989; Kaye and Jick 2001) as well as to the introduction of Poliovax in 1987. [5]

And, “The 1995.6 autistic disorder change point corresponded to the approval and introduction of the Varicella vaccine (Varivax®).” [5]

This chart summarizes the autism change points in relationship to the MMRII, the push for higher uptake of MMRII, and the chicken pox vaccine. [5]

Why aren’t the FDA (Food and Drug Administration), HHS (Federal Department of Health and Human Services), the CDC (Federal Center for Disease Control), or the ACIP (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) concerned about fetal cell contamination in vaccines causing harm?

The primary measure of effectiveness for the CDC, FDA, and vaccine makers is focused on “serologic evidence of immunity,” or a blood test showing raised antibody titers. No vaccine has ever been investigated for mutagenic or carcinogenic properties – tested and tracked long-term to see if they damage the genetic material of the recipient, if they could be implicated in causing cancer, or if they could be linked to infertility later in life. [6]

Even with all the advances in genetic understanding since the mapping of the human genome in 2001, the HHS has undertaken NO FURTHER SAFETY STUDIES on these vaccines known to contain human fetal DNA fragments. Further, the HHS has done no safety studies at all on any vaccine for 30+ years.

Isn’t that interesting.

You might be asking, ‘But aren’t the vaccine manufacturers responsible for determining safety?’ Ever since the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, all liability was removed from vaccine manufacturers and the responsibility for vaccine safety was shifted to the HHS, who recently admitted, after being forced by a court order, that no safety testing of vaccines has been undertaken. [7]

In June 2018 I had three minutes during the public comment session at the ACIP meeting held three times a year at the CDC in Atlanta. I briefly presented some of the unintended consequences of the vaccine schedule, commonly known as “non specific effects.” It remains to be seen if this information will drive any change in recommendations.

The vaccine promoters have captured the media through controlling advertising revenue. Fear campaigns are promoted so that parents rush to stay up-to-date on vaccines without examining the ingredients. Doctors are busy and have confidence in the government regulatory agency recommendations. Has our cherished vaccine program helped children avoid short term infectious illness but caused an epidemic in longterm serious developmental impairment and auto-immune disorders?

If you have any fear of your child getting chicken pox, please read the description provided by the CDC: “The clinical course in healthy children is generally mild, with malaise, pruritus (itching), and temperature up to 102°F for 2 to 3 days.” [8]

Would you rather your child have a mild fever and have some itching, or inject them with human cellular debris containing DNA fragments – which has not been tested for whether or not it may adversely impact genetics, play a role in skyrocketing childhood cancers, or impact your future ability to have grandchildren?

So, today the public is pushed to continue to inject their babies with both male and female DNA, with no investigation of the possible mutagenic (genetic alteration) impact it might be having. We watch sky-rocketing rates of childhood cancer and donate money to those searching for ‘cures’. Many parents watch helplessly as their adult children struggle with infertility, but very few make any connection to vaccines. Vaccines were never studied to impact any of that.

Does this seem like “safe” science to you?

Please share this information widely.

I highly recommend that you read the full paper by Theresa Deisher on Impact of Environmental Factors on the Prevalence of Autistic Disorder after 1979 published in the Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology on 9 July 2014.

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 25 years, Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety. Becky also loves mountain biking and appreciates all comments and the rare donation which provides wonderful encouragement. 

[1] The 2018 (current) CDC vaccine schedule: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html#f3

[2] Complete vaccine package insert for the M-M-R®II, exclusively used in the USA since 1979. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/UCM123789.pdf

[3] Hepatitis Vaccine is manufactured by both Merck and GlaxoSmithKline. Havrix® by GSK was approved for use in the US in 1995; Vaqta® by Merck was approved in 1996. However, Hepatitis vaccine was for limited population groups and not part of the childhood immunization schedule nor recommended for use by any states. In 1999, 17 states began recommending/considering its use for children 24 months and older, and in 2005 it was included in the ACIP recommended vaccination schedule for children 12 months and older. http://soundchoice.org/scpiJournalPubHealthEpidem092014.pdf

“To produce each vaccine, cell culture-adapted virus is propagated in human fibroblasts, purified from cell lysates, inactivated with formalin, and adsorbed to an aluminum hydroxide adjuvant.” The GSK version also has a preservative, 2-phenoxyethanol. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/hepa.html

[4] Vaccine package insert for Pentacel combination vaccine https://www.fda.gov/downloads/biologicsbloodvaccines/vaccines/approvedproducts/ucm109810.pdf

[5] Deisher, Theresa A, et al. “Impact of Environmental Factors on the Prevalence of Autistic Disorder after 1979.” Sound Choice Pharmaceuticals, Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology, 9 July 2014, http://soundchoice.org/scpiJournalPubHealthEpidem092014.pdf.

[6] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/rubella.html

[7] https://www.icandecide.org/health-and-human-services/

[8] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/varicella.html