Category Archives: Liability

A Beacon of Hope for Parents!

Posted on by
1
https://www.unvaccinatedchildren.com/

I remember following Larry Cook before the big censorship hit social media. I was thrilled to find his website this morning. He’s done an extremely valuable service for humanity by taking all his experience and information and putting it together in one place (unvaccinatedchildren.com) to help parents make wise informed decisions. He advocates for vaccine awareness and encourages parents raising vaccine free children who count on their natural ‘immune system’ to protect them from illness. I can’t endorse every word he says, but I highly recommend the resources he has painstakingly put together. Over decades of activism, he has learned the reality of vaccine risk through his interactions with thousands of parents of injured children and wants to help parents not only AVOID the trauma of vaccine injury – but experience the joy of raising vibrant healthy vaccine free children.

On his website you will find a FREE course for parents: How to Raise Healthy Vaccine Free Children. This course covers the WHY and the HOW. Most of us have been exposed to so much “mis-information” throughout our lives (aka propaganda) that we may experience terror in our heart at the thought of depriving our child of the magical injections so strongly promoted in our society. It can be really hard to swim upstream especially when these shots are pushed so hard by those we call experts. This course will give parents confidence to raise thriving healthy vaccine free children – living to their maximum potential.

https://www.unvaccinatedchildren.com/courses/how-to-raise-healthy-vaccine-free-children/

Here are some of the topics covered:

Mr Cook also has GREAT ideas for how to be a better communicator of vaccine truth to those you love! His title: How to Convince a Loved One NOT to Vaccinate:

https://www.unvaccinatedchildren.com/heres-how-to-convince-a-loved-one-to-not-vaccinate/

He provides a different but valuable approach to a blog I wrote a few years ago entitled, Seven Essentials for Sharing Vaccine Truth With Loved ones.

Over the years I, like Larry, have met many families who have conducted their own case study with some children receiving vaccines, and others receiving less, and some of their children completely vaccine free. Without exception, every parent conducting this ‘at home experiment’ says categorically that their vaccine free child/ren are far healthier than those who received all or some of the recommended vaccines. The proof is right in front of their eyes.

Larry Cook shares a profound insight into why giving babies so many vaccines has NOT provided protection, and could be one of the most significant causes of allergies and auto-immune ailments occurring on a massive scale today:

Vaccines Do Not Work
Aggressively overstimulating the immune system with adjuvants in order to force a TH2 immune response (while ignoring the important TH1 immune response) to create antibodies to injected antigens does NOT create immunity – it simply creates an allergic reaction.

https://www.unvaccinatedchildren.com/

I had a lovely telephone conversation yesterday with one of my readers who lives in another country. I’m not sure how she found my blog – I’ve experienced a massive decrease in number of views since powerful forces decided all counter-narrative information was dangerous. She is a fellow activist who has investigated the topic of vaccines and is making informed choices for the health of her three children. She is seeking to educate others in her circles and struggles with the deep indoctrination so prevalent in most countries. People are raised to believe that these shots are necessary and helpful, that is “safe and effective”. I believe we are making progress. Events of the last few years have been an “unveiling” of truth. So many more people today are willing to ask questions and not blindly trust government authorities. Now is the time to figure out how to approach this critically important topic in your circles!

Previous blog about unvaccinated children.

Becky Hastings collects information on health and tries her best to discover and share truth. By God’s grace, through Jesus Christ, I was saved, blessed with a husband of over 40 years, and five precious babies all grown up. I now get to delight as ten grandchildren grow! Together we can help each other discover a healthy path in this crazy upside down world.

36 by 15 months?

Posted on by
Reply
A picture of a baby edited with needles sticking into it, illustrating how many shots a baby receives.
Evee Clobes

The CDC schedule is clear. Add them up for yourself. They want every child to receive 36 doses targeting 15 different diseases by the age of 15 months — in the hope that these injections will prevent illness in your baby. But, will following this recommendation produce a healthy baby?

I can’t show the entire schedule at once because it is so large, but take a look at this segment!

Birth to 15 months vaccine schedule published by CDC

To inspect the entire schedule, as published by the CDC, go here.

Please note that the number, 36, is reached by

  • counting the DPaT and MMR as THREE because both of these shots contain 3 different concoctions added together.
  • does not include the number of injections recommended by the CDC for children in the hope of preventing influenza (aka flu). If you accept all of those (most parents do not) add three for a total of 39 by 15 months. After that, the recommendation is for an additional shot each and every year.
  • This chart only shows injections recommended up to the age of 15 months. There are plenty more the CDC recommends to get after that time. For the next portion of recommendations, go to this link and scroll down.
skeptical baby

Studying this schedule creates many questions in my mind. How did children survive before receiving such a barrage of shots? Prior to 1986 there were far less shots being promoted. See the following chart comparing shots given in s1962, 1983 and 2018.

Doses of Vaccines for US Children from Birth - 18 years

Another important question – and one that should be OBVIOUS: Has anyone ever studied in detail how this combination of shots will impact a baby? Has each shot added been tracked and followed in its entirety since it is given in combination with so many others? Searching for this information on-line has become challenging. Every search I tried brought me to yet another page by the CDC. The following diagram shows that the testing of every vaccine is based on the assumed safety of a vaccine that was older. Each vaccine added was not tested against a true placebo, but was tested against an older vaccine. When challenged by ICANdecide.org the CDC was unable to produce any safety trials showing that vaccines were tested by a true placebo. Additionally, CDC was unable to produce any evidence that the entire combination schedule of shots had been tested and proven to be safe.

Placebo Pyramid Scheme
‘Safety’ trials for all the vaccines added to the schedule built on supposed safety of previous shots

Another critically important question: Has the total amount of aluminum and other potential neurotoxins been considered in this bloated schedule? Aluminum is just one of the ingredients. There is no evidence of safety of aluminum in shots because it has never been tested for safety. Aluminum has been added to vaccines because it enhances the body’s response. It is called an adjuvant. From early days it that has been “GRAS” meaning, generally regarded as safe, despite no testing or evidence to support this categorization.

And finally, as a parent that is most concerned about a healthy happy baby who grows up to be a healthy teen and adult: Has there ever been a longterm thorough study of fully vaccinated, partially vaccinated and non vaccinated children in regards to total health outcomes? Does accepting the vaccine schedule by the CDC lead to a longer, healthier life? Since we live in a time with skyrocketing allergies, neurologic disabilities of many types, and other serious health issues in childhood, this is a vitally important question to consider. It would be very easy for the CDC to do such a study — if they truly wanted to know the results.

Here is an idea to consider. If I offer you a milkshake — in your favorite flavor — how many rat turds can I put into it before you will reject it? If I put in one rat turd, and you can easily remove it with a spoon, will you still drink the milkshake? What about a handful of rat turds, mixed around? At what point will you refuse the milkshake?

Delicious milkshake

The milkshake represents the CDCs credibility. Maybe they made a couple mistakes in the past. But how can they continue to recommend so many shots TO HEALTHY BABIES to this day? If any of their recommendations cannot stand — and the Hepatitis B shot for newborns is a great example – can I trust ANY of their recommendations?

You decide. Your baby’s health is in your hands. The most important part of your baby to protect is their brain.

Becky Hastings collects information on health and tries her best to discover and share truth. By God’s grace, through Jesus Christ, I was saved, blessed with a husband of over 40 years, and five precious babies all grown up. I now get to delight as ten grandchildren grow! Together we can help each other discover a healthy path in this crazy upside down world.

Buyer Beware

Posted on by
Reply

Have I been impacted by LIES?

If car seats had warnings about causing my child encephalitis, anaphylactic shock, SIDS, febrile seizures, chronic illness, lifelong neurological impairment, etc., I wouldn’t use them.

If my doctor told me to use the same car seat for newborns, toddlers, older children and adults, regardless of size or medical status, I would remember we don’t treat other products or medications as one-size-fits-all and I wouldn’t try to put an infant into a seat too large for an adult.

If my doctor said the exact compilation of harnesses, the direction the car seat is facing, and the type of car it fits into, all make the car seat not only safe and effective but necessary to prevent death, and then I found out they’ve NEVER studied the multiple factors together, AND that the car seat manufacturers had no liability WHATSOEVER for their products, I would question the knowledge and loyalties of my doctor and not follow the recommendation.

If I asked for more information on the car seat and my doctor gave me two pages that said the car seat works great, but failed to give me the full data sheets that showed the car seats were actually quite dangerous, haven’t been studied in babies, and have contraindications in many of the groups doctors use them in, I would at the very least find a new doctor.

If I knew the U.S. Supreme Court clearly declared car seats ‘unavoidably unsafe’ I would wonder why they aren’t making car seat manufacturers accountable for injuries and death, and I certainly wouldn’t make usage mandatory.

If I knew car seat manufacturer whistleblowers had come forward to expose data manipulation that implicated the manufacturers and the government agencies that recommended them, I wouldn’t use them and I’d call for a federal investigation rather than allowing the complicit parties to ‘investigate’ themselves.

If car seat ads accounted for 85% of mainstream media ad revenue, I would understand that they can’t be impartial with their reporting, I wouldn’t blindly trust their recommendations, and I would question all information supplied by mainstream media.

If car seat manufacturers continually paid out billions in civil and criminal fines for manipulating safety data, injuring and killing people with their products, yet the products were not recalled, I wouldn’t use them.

If car seat manufacturers used aborted babies in their manufacturing process, I wouldn’t use them.

If car seats caused the accidents they were meant to protect against, I wouldn’t use them.

If my child had a worsening reaction and decline in health every time I put them in a car seat, I wouldn’t use them.

If my doctor got paid an additional $400 every time I used a car seat, couldn’t tell me anything specific about the car seat, and saw these negative reactions following car seat exposure, but said it was ‘just a coincidence’, I wouldn’t use them and I’d get a new doctor.

If the available car seats used ingredients and schedules that were​ banned in other safer/healthier countries, I wouldn’t use them.

If I knew that after using a car seat my child might seem fine at first, but that car seats may cause infertility, cancer, mutagenesis, neurological damage and autoimmune diseases, I wouldn’t use them.

If people who didn’t use car seats were consistently healthier, I would at least do my own research.

If we weren’t allowed to do actual thorough standard scientific tests for car seat safety or ask ANY questions about them, if all dissenting views on car seats are censored — even personal accounts from parents who are direct eye-witnesses to the car seat damage — but the public is still urged, coerced and/or forced to use them, I would think maybe I should do some digging for myself instead of blindly accepting the research of the companies profiting from products known to injure or kill and for which they face no liability at all.

You can bundle the healthiest ingredients with the best of intentions, wrap them in poison and they’re still just poison. When you make an extremely profitable product liability-free, the result is that there is no incentive to make sure the product is safe or effective.

Don’t exchange liberty for a fallacious sense of security, especially at the expense of our children.

Based on writing attributed to Kristi Miller

Becky Hastings collects information on health and tries her best to discover and share truth. By God’s grace, through Jesus Christ, I was saved, blessed with a husband of over 40 years, and five precious babies all grown up. I now get to delight as ten grandchildren grow! Together we can help each other discover a healthy path in this crazy upside down world.

Man made medical emergencies are not new

Posted on by
Reply

Record numbers of deaths and disabilities have been reported to the CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System since the rollout of the experimental products urged on the entire world beginning in 1921. Billions of dollars have been made from this liability free product. Below you can see the top 10 reported events as of January 21, 2023.

Deaths33,591
Hospitalizations188,857
Urgent Care143,580
Doctor Office Visits220,606
Annaphylaxis10,331
Bell’s Palsy16,598
Miscarriages4,873
Heart Attacks18,181
Myocarditis/Pericarditis26,166
Permanently Disabled62,019
Data obtained on January 21, 2023 from openvaers.com

Eleanor McBean reports on a man-made epidemic in Kansas City in 1921! I’ve been investigating the history of vaccines from different perspectives. You can read more here (A Different View of History) and here (More History).

One reason why people rarely hear anything against vaccination is that those who raise a voice against it are silenced.

COURT CASES OF SMALLPOX EPIDEMICS DECLARED WHEN THERE WAS NO SMALLPOX

(Report from THE ADVERTISER’S PROTECTIVE BUREAU of Kansas City)

“In the fall of 1921 the health of the city was unusually good, but dull for the doctors. So the Jackson Medical Society met and resolved to make an epidemic in the city.

According to the record:

“MOTION WAS MADE AND SECONDED THAT A RECOMMENDATION BE MADE BY THE COMMITTEE TO THE BOARD OF HEALTH THAT AN EPIDEMIC OF SMALLPOX BE DECLARED TO EXIST IN THE CITY AT THE PRESENT TIME.

“MOVED AND SECONDED THAT A DAY BE SET ASIDE TO BE TERMED VACCINATION DAY, ON WHICH PHYSICIANS WILL BE STATIONED AT ALL SCHOOLS, CLINICS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND HOSPITALS … TO VACCINATE, FREE OF CHARGE. (No shots are free. The taxpayers are charged for them.)

“It is further recommended that wide publicity be given, stating that vaccination is a preventitive of smallpox and urging the absolute necessity of vaccination for every man, woman and child in the city.

Those who investigated this fake, doctor-made epidemic searched for cases of smallpox to justify this vaccination drive, but could not find one case in the city.

The scare-head vaccination propaganda showed a picture of a child covered with sores (probably from empetigo, psoriasis or congenital syphilis), and called it smallpox. People are easily frightened when public officials tell them a disease is contagious and is in their midst. The fear vanishes when people learn the truth. Smallpox is not contagious, and compulsory vaccination is illegal. (See the chapter on smallpox for information on tests which proved smallpox and other diseases are not contagious, and can be avoided with the right knowledge and application of that knowledge, given in the big book, “VACCINATION CONDEMNED BY COMPETENT DOCTORS.”

Most people do not question the decision of their doctors and public officials so they trustingly put their lives and the lives of their children into the hands of the unprincipled drug vendors. The results were disastrous for the people but good for the doctors. The hospitals were soon filled with vaccine poisoned people and the doctors had business all winter.

According to the record, the doctors made $500,000 from that Kansas City vaccination spree, not counting the millions of dollars from the hospital cases.”

Eleanor McBean, Swine Flu Expose, chapter 4: MEDICALLY-MADE EPIDEMICS—COURT CASES

Becky Hastings collects information on health and tries her best to discover and share truth. By God’s grace, through Jesus Christ, I was saved, blessed with a husband of over 40 years, and five precious babies all grown up. I now get to delight as ten grandchildren grow! Together we can help each other discover a healthy path in this crazy upside down world.

What’s the Point?

Posted on by
Reply

THIS ONE DOES NOT: 

  • stop infection
  • stop transmission
  • protect anyone around you.

What’s the point?

Children are likely at a higher risk of injury from the ‘prevention’ than from the disease itself: Increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, hospitalization, swelling of the heart. Longterm consequences on health and future fertility are unknown. Rates of reports of myopericarditis far exceed the expectations of the CDC.

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2021-08-30/03-COVID-Su-508.pdf

Watch this one minute video where CARDIOLOGIST DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH EXPLAINS HOW MYOCARDITIS DIFFERS WHEN CAUSED BY NATURAL INFECTION. “Studies suggest the lipid nano particles from the vaccine go directly to the heart. The body attacks the heart causing dramatic EKG changes. A totally different syndrome after the vaccine. Vaccine induced myocarditis is a big deal… in children it is way more serious and prominent than a post covid [natural infection] mycarditis.”

For a disease that 99.9973% of children survive.

Again, what’s the point?

A product that no one is prepared to take responsibility for. The manufacturers, licensing bodies and promoters are all 100% liability free. 

If your child is harmed, the entire responsibility rests on you – the parent.

Get informed. You, the parent, are your child’s last line of defense. Start by reading this information: SHOULD THE FDA RUSH PFIZER’S COVID VACCINE EUA FOR KIDS? https://thehighwire.com/editorial/should-the-fda-rush-pfizers-covid-vaccine-eua-for-kids/

Becky Hastings collects information on health and tries her best to discover and share truth. By God’s grace, through Jesus Christ, I was saved, blessed with a husband of 40 years, and five precious babies all grown up. I now get to delight as nine grandchildren grow! Together we can help each other discover a healthy path in this crazy upside down world.

Non Refusal

Posted on by
3

IF YOUR EMPLOYER THREATENS YOU WITH FIRING for NOT accepting the experimental liability free gene therapy product being pushed as a “VACCINE” perhaps this is your best option:

DON’T REFUSE:

The secret is NOT to refuse the jab and do not sign anything! 

Consider how you can adopt this Information from a lawyer: If you are being forced to Vax in order to keep your job, here’s a great way to handle it, called Conditional Acceptance.

The secret is NOT to refuse it.

“I write with regard to the matter of potential covid vaccine and my desire to be fully informed and appraised of ALL facts before going ahead with this medical procedure. I’d be most grateful if you could please provide the following information, in accordance with statutory legal requirements:

1. Can you please advise the approved legal status of any vaccine and if it is experimental?

2. Can you please provide details and assurances that the vaccine has been fully, independently and rigorously tested against control groups as well as the subsequent outcomes of those tests?

3. Can you please advise the entire list of contents of the vaccine I am to receive and if any are toxic to the body?

4. Can you please fully advise of all the adverse reactions associated with this vaccine since it’s introduction?

5. Can you please confirm that the vaccine you are advocating is NOT experimental mRNA gene altering therapy?

6. Can you please confirm that I will not be under any duress from yourselves as my employers, in compliance with the Nuremberg Code?

7. Can you please advise me of the likely risk of fatality, should I be unfortunate to contract Covid 19 and the likelihood of recovery?

8. Can you please advise me if the manufacturer will be held liable if I were to experience any adverse reactions after receiving the injection? If the manufacturer isn’t liable, will the company I’m currently employed with with be responsible and liable as it is at their request that I have the vaccine in order to carry on my employment?

Once I have received the above information in full and I am satisfied that there is NO threat to my health, I will be happy to accept your offer to receive the treatment, but with certain conditions – namely that:

1. You confirm in writing that I will suffer no harm.

2. Following acceptance of this, the offer must be signed by a fully qualified doctor who will take full legal and financial responsibility for any injuries occurring to myself, and/or from any interactions by authorized personnel regarding these procedures.

3. In the event that I should have to decline the offer of vaccination, please confirm that it will not compromise my position and that I will not suffer prejudice and discrimination as a result.

I would also advise that my inalienable rights are reserved.”

The point is that if they CANNOT provide that information you have NOT refused. The reality is that there are no government authorities who are willing or able to provide this information. The products are promoted as “safe and effective” yet there is no sold proof that this is the case.

This approach can be utilized with any shot your employer may want you to accept: Hepatitis B, annual Flu shots, etc. This approach can also be used for anyone ‘requiring’ any shots for your child for school, camp, travel, etc. Many have received religious exemptions, but Conditional Acceptance may offer stronger protection. You could possibly be fired or terminated, but if you have documented your interactions, you may have a legal case for wrongful dismissal.

Please note: This is not legal advice. Please consult a legal expert in your state who is a proponent of personal freedom.

More on liability. If you are experiencing strong pressure to accept this experimental medical procedure, your best approach is to be fully informed and find others who agree with your choice for personal medical freedom. May God grant us all wisdom and strength to KNOW how to navigate these days, and the courage to act out our faith in Jesus Christ – for His glory.

Becky Hastings collects information on health and tries her best to discover and share truth. By God’s grace, through Jesus Christ, I was saved, blessed with a husband of 40 years, and five precious babies all grown up. I now get to delight as nine grandchildren grow! Together we can help each other discover a healthy path in this crazy upside down world.

Pinto Liability

Posted on by
2

A guest post by someone I admire a lot: Marcella Piper-Terry

In 1978, my (then) husband bought a used 1976 Ford Pinto for me to drive back and forth to work. It was cheap on gas and very affordable. I was 3 months into my first pregnancy; I didn’t have any babies yet, so the small size and two-door design were not a problem.
It was light metallic silver in color.

Within a month of purchasing the Pinto, I was in two separate accidents.

The first accident occurred when I was struck broadside (on the passenger side) when a woman pulled out from a stop sign. She said she didn’t see me. It was an overcast day and the color of the car may have had something to do with it, since it did kind of blend in with the color of the road. The entire passenger side of the car was damaged, and it was in the shop for 3 weeks.

The day after I got the car out of the shop, I was on my way to work. I was running late, and had just passed a car on the two-lane highway that I drove every day as I traveled from home to work and back again. I was going about 60 mph when I looked down and saw a bee crawling up my thigh. I am allergic to bees. For me, it might just as well have been a snake. Panic took over, and instead of slowing to a stop and getting out of the car (as I would now), I swiped at the bee with my right hand, trying to knock it off and hoping it would fly out the window. When I swiped with my right hand, my left hand, which was on the steering wheel, followed suit and I ended up off the side of the road. I looked up and saw a telephone pole in front of me and jerked the wheel to the left, which sent me across the highway and into a ditch. I walked away from the accident. The front end of the car was badly damaged. I don’t know what happened to the bee, but I wasn’t stung. Within 24 hours I started bleeding and a week later, I lost the baby. I was 4 months pregnant and went through 7 hours of labor.

We got rid of the Pinto.

What neither of us knew at the time is that there was a fatal design flaw in that car. It had nothing to do with my two accidents, but that design flaw did end up killing somewhere between 27-180 people, depending on which report one reads.

I survived the crashes in my Pinto because the impacts in my accidents were sustained on the side and the front of the car. If I had been hit from behind, I might not be here.

The memory of my month as a Ford Pinto owner has been flashing in my mind over the last few days. It came to me as I was thinking about how people make statements about vaccine-injury; specifically, “My children are fully vaccinated and they don’t have autism. Therefore, vaccines do not cause autism.”

I drove a 1976 Ford Pinto. I was in two accidents; both of which could have been deadly. I survived. The reason I survived is because not ALL of the factors were right to produce a fatal outcome. That doesn’t mean it didn’t happen to those people who died.

Because this all kept coming to me over the last few days, I did a search yesterday and found this YouTube clip about the Ford Pinto Case, posted by ethics workshop:

Ford Pinto’s fatal design flaws

Ford knew about the design flaw and they decided to go forward with the production of the Pinto without fixing it because it would have cost $11 per car to implement a new design. That cost would have been passed along to buyers, with the increase added to the purchase price. Ford opted not to fix the problem in order to keep the cost lower, thereby benefiting the larger number of customers, while placing a smaller number of buyers at serious risk.

“There’s going to be a lot of suffering, but only for a very few people.” 

Does that sound familiar?

“The benefits of vaccination to society outweigh the risks of serious adverse reactions to those relatively few people who suffer them.”

During the process of determining whether or not to fix the Pinto’s design problem, Ford looked at the issue from a monetary perspective. They calculated the probable number of deaths (180) and severe burn injuries (180), and the amount of money they would have to pay for each. In 1970, the United States Government placed the value of a human life at $200,000. With inflation, that number would be $1.2 Million today.

As I watched and listened to the Pinto Case video, I couldn’t help drawing the parallels with the vaccine industry and with the Institute of Medicine’s decision in 2004, not to pursue research that would identify which groups of children are more vulnerable to serious vaccine-injury. They know those children exist. They have chosen not to look for them, making the decision instead to protect the vaccine program at all costs.

There are a lot of things that really bother me about this, but as I sit here trying not to make this into a novel, here are the top three…

1. In 1970, the U.S. Government valued human life at $200,000. In today’s dollars, that would be $1.2 MILLION. Yet, when a vaccine kills someone, the maximum amount that can be recovered through the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is $250,000.
2. When Ford’s product killed someone, Ford paid for the damage. When a vaccine kills someone, taxpayers pay. The government has chosen to protect vaccine manufacturers from liability. Therefore, there is no incentive for them to make a safer product.
3. In the 1970s, gasoline shortages were pushing gas prices higher. There were long lines at the pumps. There was talk of rationing gas. That’s why Ford made the Pinto in the first place. (Japanese car makers were also beating Ford to the punch and they wanted to cash in on the opportunity.) Everyone was encouraged to use less, drive less, and conserve.
Thankfully, the government didn’t mandate everyone to drive a Ford Pinto.

Vaccines are unavoidably unsafe (Supreme Court, 2011).
Some people are at increased risk of death and disability from vaccines, but those people have been deemed “acceptable collateral damage” by our government agencies.
The government has known for at least a year about allegations of fraud and destruction of evidence at The CDC.
TinyURL.com/PoseyTellsCongress  

They are choosing NOT to act and NOT to investigate, while laws to increase mandatory vaccination of all children are increasing at record speed.

Is your child at increased risk of vaccine-injury?
The only way for you to know is to research for yourself and take responsibility for the decisions you make on behalf of your child.
No one else is going to do it.
If you make the wrong choice, you will be on your own.

Here is a post I wrote on VaxTruth, which may be helpful:
http://vaxtruth.org/2015/02/my-child-at-risk/

#VaxXed
#HearUs
#RiseUp
#ParentsDoTheWork

Blog compiler: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a life & wellness coach, Becky seeks to inspire and motivate others to find increased energy, joy, and longevity. Navigating information to achieve long-term health goals in every area of life is a passion! Becky writes, speaks, and shares information hoping to educate parents on the anomalies and contradictions in the vaccine debate.