Category Archives: ACIP

Doctor presents facts

Posted on by
2

Dr. LawrencePalevsky is a renowned board certified pediatrician, sought-after lecturer, and published author, who utilizes a holistic approach to children’s wellness and illness. He provides patients and their families with personalized, comprehensive consultations to address their children’s wellness at Northport Wellness Center, New York City.

Dr Palevsky gave this comprehensive overview of his medical training and his personal research and experience regarding vaccine safety before the Connecticut Legislative Informational Forum. This 18 minute presentation covers vital information that every doctor, parent and grandparent should understand before accepting the current vaccine recommendations of 72 doses by the age of 18 for every single child.

I urge you to 1) watch; 2) take notes; 3) learn some of the most obvious facts; 4) formulate questions to ask those who continue to believe that ‘vaccines are safe and effective’ and ‘the science is settled’; 4) share. Together our education efforts are making a difference. Educating the end user – families – seems to be the most powerful way of changing this narrative. As state legislatures continue to seek to pass mandatory vaccine laws we see how political this debate has become. Information will empower families to make informed choices for the best possible long term health of their babies and children.

Transcript, edited slightly for clarity:

“In 1983, when I started medical school, I was taught vaccines were safe, they were effective and I should give them.
But I was not taught about any of the science around their safety or any of the studies around how safety (studies) were done.
It wasn’t until 1998 that a mother came up to me and said: “Doctor, did you know that there’s mercury in vaccines?”
And I said no I did not.
As a medical student I was trained to critically think.
If you see an observation you go after it try and figure out if there’s a question to ask.
So, instead of just ignoring it I looked further into the vaccine ingredients and I found that there were a number of vaccine ingredients that in animal studies were proven to be very dangerous to animals.
And I didn’t understand why these same ingredients were actually in vaccines.
I was starting to hear stories from parents.
Not dozens, not hundreds but thousands of stories, from parents, who took a very healthy child into their doctor’s office and then found that their child lost much of their health.
Whether it was their speech, whether it were seizures, whether it was death, whether it was asthma, allergies, eczema…
Whether it was autism, whether it was learning disabilities, whether it was inflammatory bowel disease, autoimmune diseases …
And every one of those parents were told it had nothing to do with the vaccine.
Every single one.
And this continues today.
But yet, when I look at the ingredients that are in the vaccines, I have the science to
actually explain how these medical problems could be happening in these children.

Today, one in five children is learning-disabled .
In 1976 it was one in 17.
One in six, under age eight.
One in two in adolescence
And one in four, in young adults, is diagnosed with a mental behavioral or emotional disorder.
One in twenty children under the age of five have seizures.
One child in forty develops autism.
The number of cases of children and adults with autoimmune diseases is rising exponentially.
It’s one of the highest rising diseases in this country.
And the vaccine ingredients, if you are willing to look at them and understand how they work, when they are injected into the body, can be seen to be responsible for every single one of these cases.
So what are these ingredients?
Well when I was in medical school we were taught that the body has something called the blood-brain barrier.
The blood-brain barrier is like Fort Knox for the brain.
Some elements that are in the bloodstream can not get into the brain.
Those elements include: drugs, viruses and bacteria… among other things that are in the blood.

Drug companies were very concerned about being able to develop drugs. So, to get the drugs into the brain. So they used something called a nanoparticle.
A nanoparticle is a very small particle, bound to the drug.
They found that if they could put a nanoparticle onto a drug they could get that drug to go into the brain. It shows in animal studies that they were able to do this.
They then were able to take an emulsifier, which is something that’s good with water and fat (it can dissolve in both) and if they added the emulsifier to the nanoparticle that was bound to the drug, they could increase drug entry into the brain 20 fold.
This is right out of animal studies that I’ve found.
So you have a drug, you have a nanoparticle and you have this emulsifier bound together.
This combination gets quite easily into the brain.
Vaccines are constructed the same way.
You have the vaccine viruses and bacteria that are bound to a nanoparticle, called aluminum,
That aluminum (which is a nanoparticle) has, by definition, the potential to enter the brain.
Most vaccines also contain polysorbate 80 or sorbitol.
Both of those compounds are emulsifiers.
Emulsifiers bind very tightly to the nanoparticle aluminum which is bound very tightly to the vaccine antigens.
This raises a question: “If the vaccine model is the same model as the model that the drug companies are using to enhance the delivery of drugs into the brain. Then is it possible that vaccine ingredients are making their way into the brain of our children?”
That could explain why so many parents are watching their kids deteriorate after vaccinations, even though the doctors, the media and the government say: absolutely no connection.
Even though the science suggests that there is a connection.
You cannot find a single study in the literature that addresses whether the injection of aluminum into the body penetrates the brain, whether any vaccine ingredients enter the brain and whether polysorbate 80 enhances the delivery of any of those ingredients into the brain.
And when I could not find those studies… I was concerned, because I’m told and you’re told
the vaccines are evaluated and very very distinctly tested for safety.
Yet, you can not find a study that says if aluminum stays in the blood or gets into the brain of children.
Does aluminum take other vaccine ingredients into the brain that don’t belong in the brain?
Because when ingredients that don’t belong in the brain get across the blood-brain barrier, they cause inflammation.
And inflammation is what we see in one in five children with learning disabilities and one in 40 children with autism.
All we have to do is ask the guidance counselor’s at schools about what they see.
If you get honest pediatricians who are telling you what they’re seeing in their practice..they will tell you:
They’re seeing kids, one after another, with more and more brain disorders.
Now, as a medical doctor – who was taught to think – I went into the literature and said:
“Are proper science studies done?”
Safety studies like for example: Where you take a vaccine and you inject it into a hundred kids and then you give another hundred kids a saline placebo (meaning it’s inert).
No study exists to actually evaluate the safety of a vaccine compared to a placebo group. None !!

When vaccines are studied, the maximum amount of days that vaccines are studied is up to ten days to two weeks.
And unfortunately, the vaccine manufacturers pre select what side effects they will allow to be associated with the vaccines.
So, if a child has a vaccine reaction that is associated with the vaccine, the vaccine manufacturers will decide whether or not it should or should not be associated with the vaccine. And the public knows this and they’re learning it more and more.
So, if your child develops seizures five months after a vaccine, your child is told by the doctor that it had nothing to do with the vaccine.
But that’s not true, because there are no studies to prove it.
There is opinion… but there’s never been a study really addressing whether a vaccination at two months or even nine hours of age, could be related to an event that happened months or even years later, and yet we have some of the sickest children in our country.
In New York, we lost the religious exemption on June 13th, 2019, because the unvaccinated children with a religious exemption were blamed for a measles outbreak.
When I met with representatives in New York I told them that there is no study to prove that unvaccinated children have ever been proven to start an epidemic.
He was surprised and he said: “I will vote against removing the religious exemption if I can’t find a study like you say.”
He could not find a study, but he voted to repeal the exemption anyway,… because there are no studies.
There are no studies proving that unvaccinated children are responsible.
There’s consensus…”

Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 23 years Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety.

Safety?

Posted on by
2
A picture showing how to inject a baby under the age of 12 months at one visit. IPV in the left arm, PCV 13 and Hep B for right thigh, Hib and DTaP for left thigh, and rotavirus orally.

CDC has set up an Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice. ACIP has no idea if it is safe to give multiple vaccines at once – because no study has been done. Yet for decades the members of ACIP have added vaccines. They publish recommendations that take for granted giving multiple vaccines at the same time. They advise doctors to give multiple vaccines with different antigens and different adjuvants injected into babies and children. Their caution? Just inject into different limbs – everything is fine.

Please watch this very brief exchange at an ACIP meeting where a new Hepatitis B vaccine with a new adjuvant is being added to the schedule. Do the two women guiding this meeting seem to be competent to answer difficult scientific questions on vaccine safety? I personally find this exchange very disturbing.

The CDC website and vocal vaccine promoters insist that the science has been settled and there is no connection between vaccines and autism. Yet Dr Bernadine Healy, a cardiologist, academic physician, and the first female Director of the National Institutes of Health, expressed a very different picture of the science stating “The question of autism and vaccines has not been answered.” 

Dr Stanley Plotkin admitted in a deposition that there has been no study into the possible correlation between autism and the DTaP vaccine. In fact, there has only been one serious study of autism and vaccines which involved only one vaccine, the MMR. This is the study that the CDC whistleblower, Dr William Thompson, a senior research scientist at CDC, admitted the entire team committed scientific fraud. Vaxxed: from Cover-Up to Catastrophe is a detailed expose of the facts surrounding the whistleblower’s revelations.

So how safe are those vaccines which are daily being injected into our babies and children?

No one actually knows. Do you trust the giddy scientists that rely on – “well we always do it, just make sure you inject into different limbs” approach to safety? Or does approach seem more like relying on folklore? What is the true scientific approach? Science is always verifiable and repeatable. Science is never settled.

Journeyboost is authored and maintained by Becky Hastings in the hope of assisting parents and others make wise decisions for the health and future of their families. Please find much more vaccine information starting here.

So Many Questions

Posted on by
2

There are some ‘scientific’ studies vaccine proponents can produce that may convince you there is no relationship between vaccines and SIDS, autism, and a host of other conditions listed on vaccine package inserts.

  • If these ‘studies’ are indeed 100% accurate, I wonder why the CDC won’t allow independent scientists access to the VSD (vaccine safety data link) started in 1990 to monitor the safety of vaccines?
  • I also question the loyalty of all employees producing such ‘science’ from the CDC and all members of the ACIP that make vaccine recommendations which impact millions worldwide.
  • If the vaccine industry is squeaky clean, why are the manufacturers indemnified from all harm their product may cause?
  • Why did the US Supreme Court rule in 2011 that “vaccines are unavoidably unsafe”? Why has the VICP become an aggressively difficult closed court instead of the quick recompense it was initially set up for?
  • Why did CDC ghost all the researchers from Harvard whom they had commissioned to research the accuracy of the VAERS data base and whom they had paid over a million dollars?
  • Why are government agencies which promote and protect vaccines attacking innocent parents instead of doing the safety studies and tracking vaccines using true placebos controls – the same way all other drugs are approved for use? Why has the entire schedule never been tested for safety?
  • Why is the character of those asking questions the primary target of those who endorse and profit from vaccines?
  • Why are top specialists in aluminum, stem cells, and toxicology, with no vested interested in the industry, summarily ignored or denounced?

So many questions. So few answers. So little rational conversation is happening on this topic. Why?

I don’t have all the answers. Parents need to know there are a LOT of questions. Please watch Vaxxed 2. This movie clearly demonstrates that there is a great deal of harm from vaccines that the ‘experts’ seem determined to ignore. The Vaxxed Team collected over 7,000 signatures on the bus used to travel the country and collect these stories on video. Real people who put real trust in vaccines until they realized the harm inflicted on their children. Don’t be ignorant or silent anymore.

Watch the original Vaxxed: From Cover-Up To Catastrophe to understand how this groundswell of families was created. An avalanche of human suffering uncovered.

Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, writes for the love of health, babies and Jesus.

Hospitals push flu vaccines

Posted on by
2

Most people are unaware, but something significant changed when Obama signed the Affordable Care Act into law in 2010. Nurses in hospitals are now required to ask every single patient upon arrival – for any and all reasons – if they have had a flu vaccine already this year (September – March) or a pneumococcal vaccine. If they report that they have not received these vaccines, it will be noted in the computer records and an order will automatically be generated to give the patient these vaccines. No doctor is consulted. It is the “Standard of Care” hospital policy. Since the CDC and most state Health Departments recommend flu shots yearly for all ages, this impacts everyone. Pneumococcal vaccines are promoted to those over the age of 65 and may also be offered to babies/young children since the CDC includes them in their recommendations. If you are at the hospital for elective surgery, a broken limb, or anything else, you will be targeted to get those vaccines.

How do you protect yourself?

  • Never sign an electronic signature pad when admitted to a hospital – the information in these ‘forms’ include giving permission for the administration of “biologics” which means you have just signed permission to be injected with vaccines.
  • Ask for a paper copy. Write clearly “No Biologics” and “No Vaccines” above your signature. I have heard of patients being told they cannot provide paper copies. In this instance you may continue to refuse to sign the electronic signature pad and see what they are able to come up with.
  • Some people aren’t willing to take any chances and suggest using a Sharpie permanent marker to write on both arms before elective surgery: “No Biologics” and “No Vaccines” so the nurse will have no doubt of your refusal! There have been too many cases of a nurse ‘forgetting’ or giving vaccines even after refusal.  Take a photo of it written on your body – as proof of refusal!

The view point of most hospital facilities is that even if someone already received a flu vaccine earlier in the season, or if their vaccine status is “unknown” IT WON’T HURT TO BE VACCINATED TWICE. So, if you are admitted to the hospital and you can’t remember if you have had a flu shot this season, as long as you don’t refuse, you will get a flu shot on admission. Nurses can also get permission from family members and give flu shots while the patient is recovering from surgery.

It’s important that you make sure every family member knows your desire to avoid all vaccines.

Also, patients admitted for trauma will get a TDaP in the ER when they arrive UNLESS THE PATIENT OR THE FAMILY REFUSES at the time of the trauma. Hospital “standard of care” policy for nearly all injuries, especially those with a point of entry, is to order a TDaP/DTaP (depending on the age). So even if you cut your hand washing dishes in soapy water, expect to be offered a TDaP.

Vaccination is nurse driven. Hospital policy dictates that nurses should be vigilant in regards to vaccines for all admissions. They are instructed to assess vaccination status of all patients admitted to hospital. The guideline used is that ALL PATIENTS GET A FLU SHOT on the second day in the hospital from September – March (sometimes longer). Vaccines will be administered unless REFUSED by the patient.

The key is that THE PATIENT HAS THE RIGHT TO REFUSE. But sometimes it requires extreme vigilance to exercise your right!

https://bentonintegrative.blogspot.com/2017/10/why-this-doctor-doesnt-get-her-flu-shot.html

Smart doctors, smart nurses, and informed humans all REFUSE flu vaccines. Read the story of how one smart doctor figured out – after 3 years of getting sick after flu vaccines – that it was time to do some REAL RESEARCH. The information she found out after contacting the CDC flu division is profound. Flu vaccines don’t work. The CDC admits it.

Becky Hastings, passionate about Jesus, health, family, truth and healing foods. Wife, mother, grandmother, life and health coach.

Please share your experience in the comments! Thanks

Calling for RATIONAL THOUGHT

Posted on by
1

Is the current vaccine policy rational?

Vaccines currently recommended/mandated for school attendance:
• Tetanus: a disease that that is non contagious;
• Hepatitis B: a disease not spread easily in a school setting and for which children with active cases of Hepatitis B are allowed to attend school;
• Pertussis, Diphtheria, Polio: diseases for which the vaccine is not capable of preventing transmission of infection;
• Rubella: a vaccine that has never been studied for clinical effectiveness;
• Mumps: a vaccine not efficacious enough to impart the required threshold of herd immunity;
• Measles: a vaccine not durable enough to ensure long-term protection of the majority of vaccinated students from developing a modified form of the disease;
• Chickenpox: a vaccine not utilized by other developed countries for mass vaccination.

If you look at it this way you see how unreasonable this policy is. The current CDC vaccine policy is not grounded in medical ethics, is not grounded in understanding of what vaccines can and cannot achieve, and cannot be claimed to be founded on ‘science’. Vaccine education currently discounts inconvenient FACTS and protects a multi billion-dollar industry peddling a liability free product. Why?

In this talk Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD uses the CDC’s own studies and other accepted peer reviewed scientific data sources to prove these claims.

Posted by Becky Hastings in the interests of education for parents.

Vaccine Science CDC Ignores

Posted on by
13

Please take some time to peruse through these 35 studies published in reputable scientific journals. Get the facts for yourself. Your doctor might also like to investigate facts straight out of published papers rather than relying on pharmaceutical reps for their training. If you don’t manage to get through all of the papers, go straight to the bottom and watch a short video with insightful commentary by someone who has scoured the science literature for information on vaccine safety.

  1. Study: Adverse Events following 12 and 18 Month Vaccinations: a Population-Based, Self-Controlled Case Series Analysis. For 1 in 168 children, vaccines cause side effects so severe that they require an ER visit. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236196/
  2. Study: Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS 1997-2002. Boys vaccinated against Hep B at birth are 3x more likely to develop autism. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170
  3. Analysis: Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity? “A high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates…” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075/
  4. Case Study: Simultaneous sudden infant death syndrome. Rare simultaneous Sudden Infant Death (SID) of identical twins 2 days after vaccination. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17654772
  5. Study: The link between rotavirus vaccination and intussusception: implications for vaccine strategies. Rotovirus linked to fatal intestinal disorder in 1 in every 4670 infants. “There was also an increase in the risk of intussusception after the second dose of the vaccine… The strong association between vaccination with RRV-TV and intussusception among otherwise healthy infants supports the existence of a causal relation.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1773072/
  6. Analysis: Commentary–Controversies surrounding mercury in vaccines: autism denial as impediment to universal immunization. “The risk of autism among African American children vaccinated before the age of 2 years was 340% that of those vaccinated later.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377033
  7. Analysis: Methodological issues and evidence of malfeasance in research purporting to show thimerosal in vaccines is safe. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24995277
  8. Study: Abnormal measles-mumps-rubella antibodies and CNS autoimmunity in children with autism. Link between antibodies from MMR vaccine and central nervous system autoimmune dysfunction in children with autism. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534
  9. Study: Do aluminum vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099159
  10. Study: What is regressive autism and why does it occur? Is it the consequence of multi-systemic dysfunction affecting the elimination of heavy metals and the ability to regulate neural temperature? “The related and damaging effect of exposure to high levels of mercury… a viable alternative explanation for the occurrence of regressive autism. The evidence indicates there is alteration to chromosome structure and/or function.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/
  11. Study: A case series of children with apparent mercury toxic encephalopathies manifesting with clinical symptoms of regressive autistic disorders. Mercury toxic encephalopathy manifesting with clinical symptoms of regressive autistic disorders. ‪http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560
  12. Analysis: A comprehensive review of mercury provoked autism. “A comprehensive review of mercury-provoked autism. In conclusion, the overwhelming preponderance of the evidence favours acceptance that Hg exposure is capable of causing some ASDs.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19106436
  13. Analysis: Thimerosal Exposure and the Role of Sulfating Chemistry and Thiol Availability in Autism. Explanation of why some children are at greater risk of developing autism after vaccines. “The evidence suggests that the abnormal sulfation chemistry, limited thiol availability, and decreased GSH reserve capacity could explain why the adverse effects of TM are greater in a subpopulation of children with this susceptibility…” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3774468/
  14. Evidence: B-Lymphocytes from a Population of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Their Unaffected Siblings Exhibit Hypersensitivity to Thimerosal. “Certain individuals with a mild mitochondrial defect may be highly susceptible to mitochondrial specific toxins” found in vaccines, resulting in autism spectrum disorders. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3697751/
  15. Review: Theoretical aspects of autism: causes–a review. Autism linked to encephalitis (brain swelling) following vaccination. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21299355
  16. Hypotheses: Autism: a novel form of mercury poisoning. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11339848
  17. Study: A prospective study of thimerosal-containing Rho(D)-immune globulin administration as a risk factor for autistic disorders. Link between autism and prenatal exposure to heavy metals via Rhogam shot in RH-negative mothers. “Children with ASDs (28.30%) were significantly more likely (odds ratio 2.35, 95% confidence interval 1.17-4.52, p < 0.01) to have Rh-negative mothers than controls (14.36%).” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17674242
  18. Study: Reduced levels of mercury in first baby haircuts of autistic children. Autistic children have difficulty excreting heavy metals like mercury, as evidenced by significantly lower levels of mercury in their hair. This points to a genetic susceptibility to autism in children who cannot effectively detox vaccine toxins. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12933322
  19. Analysis: A possible central mechanism in autism spectrum disorders, part 1. “A possible central mechanism in autism spectrum disorders… the link between excessive vaccination, use of aluminum and ethylmercury as vaccine adjuvants, food allergies, gut dysbiosis, and abnormal formation of the developing brain.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19043938
  20. Study: The role of mercury in the pathogenesis of autism. “The role of mercury [found in vaccines] in the pathogenesis of autism.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12142947
  21. Study: Transcriptomic analyses of neurotoxic effects in mouse brain after intermittent neonatal administration of thimerosal. Vaccine additives induce autistic behavior in mice. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24675092
  22. Study: Elevated levels of measles antibodies in children with autism. Vaccine-induced autoimmunity may cause autism. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12849883
  23. Study: Mercury and autism: accelerating evidence? Relation of mercury to high autism rates in boys http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16264412
  24. Survey Study: Acetaminophen (paracetamol) use, measles-mumps-rubella vaccination, and autistic disorder: the results of a parent survey. Tylenol following MMR Linked to Autism http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18445737
  25. Study:
    1. Abstract: Impact of environmental factors on the prevalence of autistic disorder after 1979. Fetal and Retroviral Contaminants in Vaccines Linked to Autism and Cancer. “…Linear regression revealed that Varicella and Hepatitis A immunization coverage was significantly correlated to autistic disorder cases… Autistic disorder change points years are coincident with introduction of vaccines manufactured using human fetal cell lines, containing fetal and retroviral contaminants, into childhood vaccine regimens. This pattern was repeated in the US, UK, Western Australia and Denmark. Thus, rising autistic disorder prevalence is directly related to vaccines manufactured utilizing human fetal cells…” Abstract: http://www.academicjournals.org/…/article-abst…/C98151247042
    2. Full Study: Impact of environmental factors on the prevalence of autistic disorder after 1979 https://academicjournals.org/journal/JPHE/article-full-text-pdf/C98151247042
  26. Evidence: WHO Informal consultation on the application of molecular methods to assure the quality, safety, and efficacy of vaccines. Scientists have known for decades about the dangers of insertional mutagenesis caused by using human fetal cell lines in vaccines. Instead of conducting safety studies, the FDA has ignored the dangers and merely regulates the amount of human DNA that can be present in a vaccine to no greater than 10ng–an amount that has not been proven safe. https://www.who.int/biologicals/Molecular%20Methods%20Final%20Mtg%20Report%20April2005.pdf
  27. Hypothesis: conjugate vaccines may predispose children to autism spectrum disorders. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250
  28. Study: A positive association found between autism prevalence and childhood vaccination uptake across the U.S. population. “The higher the proportion of children receiving recommended vaccinations, the higher was the prevalence of AUT or SLI. A 1% increase in vaccination was associated with an additional 680 children having AUT or SLI. Neither parental behavior nor access to care affected the results, since vaccination proportions were not significantly related (statistically) to any other disability or to the number of pediatricians in a U.S. state. The results suggest that although mercury has been removed from many vaccines, other culprits may link vaccines to autism.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535
  29. Study: A two-phase study evaluating the relationship between Thimerosal-containing vaccine administration and the risk for an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis in the United States. “The present study provides new epidemiological evidence supporting an association between increasing organic-Hg exposure from Thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines and the subsequent risk of an ASD diagnosis.”http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878266/
  30. Study: Adverse events following immunization with vaccines containing adjuvants. Adverse events after vaccines containing adjuvants linked to autism and autoimmune conditions. “A traditional infectious disease vaccine is a preparation of live attenuated, inactivated or killed pathogen that stimulates immunity. Vaccine immunologic adjuvants are compounds incorporated into vaccines to enhance immunogenicity. Adjuvants have recently been implicated in the new syndrome named ASIA autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants…. The most frequent clinical findings were pyrexia 68%, arthralgias 47%, cutaneous disorders 33%, muscle weakness 16% and myalgias 14%. Three patients had diagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome, one patient had Adult-Still’s disease 3 days after vaccination. A total of 76% of the events occurred in the first 3 days post-vaccination. Two patients with previous autoimmune disease showed severe adverse reactions with the reactivation of their illness… Vaccines containing adjuvants may be associated with an increased risk of autoimmune/inflammatory adverse events following immunization. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23576057
  31. Study: Hair Toxic Metal Concentrations and Autism Spectrum Disorder Severity in Young Children. Higher heavy metals in hair samples from severely autistic children http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/9/12/4486
  32. Study: What is regressive autism and why does it occur? Is it the consequence of multi-systemic dysfunction affecting the elimination of heavy metals and the ability to regulate neural temperature? Subtle DNA changes and the overuse of vaccines in autism. “There is a compelling argument that the occurrence of regressive autism is attributable to genetic and chromosomal abnormalities, arising from the overuse of vaccines, which subsequently affects the stability and function of the autonomic nervous system and physiological systems… This article explores the issues and concludes that sensory dysfunction and systemic failure, manifested as autism, is the inevitable consequence arising from subtle DNA alteration and consequently from the overuse of vaccines.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/

Do you have more irrefutable proof? Please leave a link to your source in the comments!

And, for the cherry on the cake, watch this video by Del Bigtree, founder of Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) who has painstakingly reviewed all the relevant science papers on vaccine safety and has an incredible way of breaking them down and explaining what they mean.

The Irrefutable Argument Against Vaccine Safety, with Del Bigtree

This blog post was inspired by information supplied by Chris Kirckof.

Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 23 years Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety.

Let’s Discuss Liability

Posted on by
5

Car versus Vaccine

No one makes you buy a car, but when you do, the manufacturer takes responsibility for flaws and recalls defective models at enormous expense. Car manufacturers, by law, must take responsibility for their products. If your vehicle is flawed and you are in an accident you can present a case against them.

You have the right to buy a car or the right to refuse to buy a car. You can investigate the safety record of all car makers.

You also have the right to refuse or to accept a vaccine. Unlike cars, the vaccine manufacturer has been shielded from all liability for harm that may be caused by their product. If you or your child is harmed – or killed – by their vaccine, YOU, as the parent, are the only person with full responsibility. The pharmaceutical companies were granted immunity for their vaccine products in 1986. All vaccines approved by the ACIP and added to the CDC recommended schedule carry no liability for the doctor, manufacturer, or those recommending the vaccine.

Forty four states still allow religious exemptions for your non vaccinated child to attend school. All 50 states allow a medical exemption from vaccines.

If you are forced to accept a vaccine for work or school and are told that a religious exemption is not acceptable, here is a strategy that has worked for many. Provide an indemnity form. Ask the person pushing who is compelling the vaccine to sign the form. The form will state clearly that they agree to accept responsibility for any harm or injury which is a result of the vaccine. This is very important. Those administering the vaccine must understand that because the pharmaceutical company is not liable, they, as the entity pushing the vaccine must accept the liability or YOUR CHILD WILL NOT BE VACCINATED. Stay calm. Just ask for the form to be completed.

No entity can force another to accept unknown substances injected into them without taking responsibility for the consequences. Informed consent should always be the rule when drugs and medical procedures are involved. The first rule of the Nuremberg Code is voluntary consent. Vaccines are drugs. Vaccinations are medical procedures.

Do you trust the guy who makes your car? He cares about safety – because he cares about profit. Lack of safety will reduce his profit. Can you trust the guy who makes the vaccines? He has no reason to be trusted. His profit is guaranteed regardless of the safety. The industry has convinced the public – and politicians – that vaccines are safe and effective. Yet, vaccines have never undergone rigorous scientific testing; no double blind placebo controlled studies to prove safety; and no vaccine combinations have even been studied for safety. Vaccine makers are 100% free from all liability. The gold standard does not apply to vaccines.

EVERY manufacturer of pediatric vaccines: Merck, Sanofi, Glaxo Smith Kline, Novartis – has plead guilty to fraud in the last 3 years. Not for vaccines, but for other drugs they manufacture.

You can get rid of a flawed car, but you can never unvaccinate your precious child.

There are many risks to vaccines. Please make sure you are fully informed.

Compiled by Becky Hastings (with inspiration from a friend), avid follower of Jesus Christ, wife, mother, grandmother, health seeker and reporter. Seeking truth can be challenging, and sometimes confusing, but far more rewarding than staying ignorant.

Babies Get Injections

Posted on by
Reply

These two graphics are published on a CDC website illustrating where to inject multiple vaccines to a baby at one visit.

A screen shot from Merck shows conflicting information:

The conflicts:

Point one says don’t use with other live virus vaccines, but give MMR one month before or after live viral vaccines. Varicella is a live virus vaccine. Point two contradicts point one: “MMR II has been administered concurrently with VARIVAX”… using separate injection sites and syringes – but no mention is made of safety tracking. Point four says the ACIP declares that simultaneous administration causes “no interference”. No mention is made of any study of the safety of giving all these vaccines at one time.

I did find an encouraging document linked on the same CDC link that addresses procedures to follow if there is a vaccine adverse reaction.

“These reactions can vary from trivial and inconvenient (e.g., soreness, itching) to severe and life threatening (e.g., anaphylaxis). Vaccine providers should be familiar with identifying immediate-type allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, and competent in treating these events at the time of vaccine administration. Providers should also have a plan in place to contact emergency medical services immediately in the event of a severe acute vaccine reaction.“

Parents, please research vaccines more than you research any other item or decision you make for your baby. All vaccine manufacturers have been given a liability free product. When their vaccine is added to CDC’s ACIP recommended shots for all babies and children, there is a LOT of money involved. If your baby/child experiences any vaccine reaction or death, you will bear the responsibility on your own. There is a cumbersome process to receive compensation through VICP which has paid $4 billion since 1988 to those injured or killed by vaccines. This represents a small fraction of the true harm vaccines have caused.

At the very least ask your vaccine provider if they have an emergency plan in place in the event of severe acute vaccine reaction. If they don’t have one, chances are, they lack information on administering vaccines and recognizing adverse reactions. If you do decide to give vaccines, please read this piece which has many helpful tips for reducing any potential reaction.

Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, avid reader, health promoter, and seeker of truth through Jesus Christ. Navigating health information can be confusing. Becky writes and speaks to educate parents on the anomalies and contradictions in many aspects of modern medical recommendations.

Why is Gardasil Still Harming Children?

Posted on by
1

Christopher Bunch, age 14, died soon after receiving a Gardasil vaccine.

Please watch and share with parents of pre-teens. Parents are pushed through emotional marketing that this vaccine will prevent cancer and help their child. There is very little evidence to support those claims. Research – like your life depends on it. Christopher’s parents wish they had.

Watch the video below of his mother describing Christopher’s life and death during public comment at the CDC’s Advisory Committee for Immunization Practice meeting in October 2018. This committee makes decisions on which vaccines are approved and for whom. Gardasil is a vaccine targeting only 9 of over 80 strains of the HPV virus and is proclaimed as a way to prevent cervical cancer which is purported to prevent cervical cancer to boys. The ACIP decision to approve giving this vaccine to boys directly resulted in Christopher’s untimely death.

Immediately after, Chris’ heartbroken father presents facts to ACIP. Brandy Vaughan, former Merck sales rep, joins him to describe the details of how many deaths and injuries have resulted from this vaccine, and states she has over 50 scientific studies verifying the harm caused by this vaccine. She states, “If this were a pharmaceutical drug, would it still be on the market?”

 

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a life & wellness coach, Becky seeks to inspire and motivate others to find increased energy, joy, and longevity. Navigating information to achieve long-term health goals in every area of life is a passion!

WHAT IS THE IMPACT of injecting human DNA into our BABIES???

Posted on by
8

In the previous blog conclusive evidence was presented showing that some vaccines contain residual human fetal cell material from the growth mediums used in vaccine manufacture. Most people are unaware that the shots they inject into babies contain fragments of cells from human babies, and some even deny that this is true.

Four significant vaccines on the CDC recommended schedule [1] all contain human fetal tissue fragments, including both male and female DNA:

  • M-M-R®II: exclusively available in the USA since 1979 targeting measles, mumps, and rubella; 2 doses at 12 months and 5 years. [2]
  • Varivax®: the vaccine aimed to prevent chicken pox, added to the schedule in 1996; 2 doses at 12 months and 5 years.
  • Hepatitis A vaccine, approved in 1996, and added to the schedule for all babies in 2005; 2 doses given between 12 and 24 months. [3]
  • Pentacel® combined vaccine targeting diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, polio, Haemophilus influenza type b (Hib), introduced in 2008. Four doses given at 2, 4, 6, and 15 months of age. [4]

The average baby is injected with 10 different human tissue-containing shots before they go to school. Eight of them before the age of two years. Surely such widespread use of this growth medium – human fetal cells – was thoroughly demonstrated to be safe – right?

Since 40 years have passed since the first vaccine containing human cell debris was introduced, there has been ample time to study how this vaccine containing human DNA fragments could be impacting those that are injected with it.

But, how much DNA is really in a vaccine? Isn’t it just infinitesimally small amounts?

DNA residuals in human fetal cell line manufactured vaccines

In addition to the ingredients listed on the package insert for Meruvax II® (rubella), we detected significant levels of human ssDNA (142 ± 8 ng/vial) as well as dsDNA (35 ±10 ng/vial) fragmented to ~215 base pairs in length. The MMR II® package insert discloses the presence of human fetal residuals [sic] [but not] how much cell substrate dsDNA or ssDNA contaminates each dose. In each vial of Havrix® [Hepatitis A vaccine], we detected ssDNA (301 ± 153 ng/vial) as well as dsDNA (44 ± 24 ng/vial) unfragmented residual DNA more than 48.5 K base pairs in length. The Havrix® package insert discloses the presence of human fetal cellular residuals from the MRC-5 cell line, but not the DNA contaminant levels specifically.[5]

The Varivax® vaccine [chicken pox] is manufactured using the human diploid cell line MRC5, and is contaminated with 2 micrograms of cell substrate double stranded DNA. Single stranded DNA levels are not reported in Merck’s Varivax Summary Basis for Approval document nor are the length of the DNA fragments contaminating the vaccine (Merck 2011). [5]

Vaccines that have been cultured on or manufactured using the WI-38 fetal cell line such as MeruvaxII®, MMRII®, Varivax®, Havrix® and Pentacel® are additionally contaminated with fragments of human endogenous retrovirus HERVK (Victoria et al., 2010). Recent evidence has shown that human endogenous retroviral transcripts are elevated in the brains of patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder (Frank et al., 2005), [5]

According to EPA recommendations, birth year change points for prevalence of autistic disorder should drive consideration of environmental triggers, as for any disease (McDonald 2010).[5]

Scientists have been studying and learning that injected “human fetal DNA fragments are inducers of autoimmune reactions, while both DNA fragments and retroviruses are known to potentiate genomic insertions and mutations (Yolken et al., 2000; Kurth 1998; U S Food and Drug Administration 2011).” [5]

How has injecting male and female DNA fragments into ALL babies impacted their health? 

A detailed analysis of the data available and has found startling results. There are statistically obvious change points associated with the addition of fetal cell line vaccines and increased diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: “Autistic disorder began to rise in the US after birth year 1978 (Newschaffer and Gurney 2005).” This corresponds to the introduction of the MMRII developed with two different fetal cell tissues. [5]

Additionally, “The US 1988.4 change point corresponded to the addition of a second dose of MMRII® to a measles vaccination campaign that increased compliance from ≤50 to 82% between birth years 1987 and 1989 (Centers for Disease Control 1989; Kaye and Jick 2001) as well as to the introduction of Poliovax in 1987. [5]

And, “The 1995.6 autistic disorder change point corresponded to the approval and introduction of the Varicella vaccine (Varivax®).” [5]

This chart summarizes the autism change points in relationship to the MMRII, the push for higher uptake of MMRII, and the chicken pox vaccine. [5]

Why aren’t the FDA (Food and Drug Administration), HHS (Federal Department of Health and Human Services), the CDC (Federal Center for Disease Control), or the ACIP (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) concerned about fetal cell contamination in vaccines causing harm?

The primary measure of effectiveness for the CDC, FDA, and vaccine makers is focused on “serologic evidence of immunity,” or a blood test showing raised antibody titers. No vaccine has ever been investigated for mutagenic or carcinogenic properties – tested and tracked long-term to see if they damage the genetic material of the recipient, if they could be implicated in causing cancer, or if they could be linked to infertility later in life. [6]

Even with all the advances in genetic understanding since the mapping of the human genome in 2001, the HHS has undertaken NO FURTHER SAFETY STUDIES on these vaccines known to contain human fetal DNA fragments. Further, the HHS has done no safety studies at all on any vaccine for 30+ years.

Isn’t that interesting.

You might be asking, ‘But aren’t the vaccine manufacturers responsible for determining safety?’ Ever since the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, all liability was removed from vaccine manufacturers and the responsibility for vaccine safety was shifted to the HHS, who recently admitted, after being forced by a court order, that no safety testing of vaccines has been undertaken. [7]

In June 2018 I had three minutes during the public comment session at the ACIP meeting held three times a year at the CDC in Atlanta. I briefly presented some of the unintended consequences of the vaccine schedule, commonly known as “non specific effects.” It remains to be seen if this information will drive any change in recommendations.

The vaccine promoters have captured the media through controlling advertising revenue. Fear campaigns are promoted so that parents rush to stay up-to-date on vaccines without examining the ingredients. Doctors are busy and have confidence in the government regulatory agency recommendations. Has our cherished vaccine program helped children avoid short term infectious illness but caused an epidemic in longterm serious developmental impairment and auto-immune disorders?

If you have any fear of your child getting chicken pox, please read the description provided by the CDC: “The clinical course in healthy children is generally mild, with malaise, pruritus (itching), and temperature up to 102°F for 2 to 3 days.” [8]

Would you rather your child have a mild fever and have some itching, or inject them with human cellular debris containing DNA fragments – which has not been tested for whether or not it may adversely impact genetics, play a role in skyrocketing childhood cancers, or impact your future ability to have grandchildren?

So, today the public is pushed to continue to inject their babies with both male and female DNA, with no investigation of the possible mutagenic (genetic alteration) impact it might be having. We watch sky-rocketing rates of childhood cancer and donate money to those searching for ‘cures’. Many parents watch helplessly as their adult children struggle with infertility, but very few make any connection to vaccines. Vaccines were never studied to impact any of that.

Does this seem like “safe” science to you?

Please share this information widely.

I highly recommend that you read the full paper by Theresa Deisher on Impact of Environmental Factors on the Prevalence of Autistic Disorder after 1979 published in the Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology on 9 July 2014.

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 25 years, Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety. Becky also loves mountain biking and appreciates all comments and the rare donation which provides wonderful encouragement. 

[1] The 2018 (current) CDC vaccine schedule: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html#f3

[2] Complete vaccine package insert for the M-M-R®II, exclusively used in the USA since 1979. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/UCM123789.pdf

[3] Hepatitis Vaccine is manufactured by both Merck and GlaxoSmithKline. Havrix® by GSK was approved for use in the US in 1995; Vaqta® by Merck was approved in 1996. However, Hepatitis vaccine was for limited population groups and not part of the childhood immunization schedule nor recommended for use by any states. In 1999, 17 states began recommending/considering its use for children 24 months and older, and in 2005 it was included in the ACIP recommended vaccination schedule for children 12 months and older. http://soundchoice.org/scpiJournalPubHealthEpidem092014.pdf

“To produce each vaccine, cell culture-adapted virus is propagated in human fibroblasts, purified from cell lysates, inactivated with formalin, and adsorbed to an aluminum hydroxide adjuvant.” The GSK version also has a preservative, 2-phenoxyethanol. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/hepa.html

[4] Vaccine package insert for Pentacel combination vaccine https://www.fda.gov/downloads/biologicsbloodvaccines/vaccines/approvedproducts/ucm109810.pdf

[5] Deisher, Theresa A, et al. “Impact of Environmental Factors on the Prevalence of Autistic Disorder after 1979.” Sound Choice Pharmaceuticals, Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology, 9 July 2014, http://soundchoice.org/scpiJournalPubHealthEpidem092014.pdf.

[6] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/rubella.html

[7] https://www.icandecide.org/health-and-human-services/

[8] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/varicella.html