Are Statins a good choice?

Is lowering cholesterol good for me? Does lowering cholesterol levels lead to a longer better life?

Medical information. What is the most reliable source? You might have been diagnosed with “high cholesterol” and are told you need to take a statin. When you are prescribed a statin, it is generally expected that you will be taking this drug for life. Are there any risks? Should I just trust my doctor and take it? Does the fact that “most cardiologists are taking statins themselves” enough of a reason to take this $15 billion drug?

From an article by Jan Wellmann from 23 May 2024 on Substack: 

Talking About Fats, Cholesterol, and Statins

https://janwellmann.substack.com/p/talking-about-fats-cholesterol-and?r=xwr6b&utm_medium=ios&triedRedirect=true

There you will find a 1+ hour interview with Dr Malcolm Kendrick, a Scottish General Practitioner, heart disease specialist, and author of several books: “Doctoring Data”, “The Great Cholesterol Con”, “The Clot Thickens” and “Statin Nation”. 

Malcolm offers a uniquely honest perspective on the healthcare industry and the harm caused by the cholesterol narrative. He uses data and shows how a lot of the information we have been presented is relying on “doctored data” and not true facts.

Of 27 major placebo controlled trials on statins only 1 was not funded by the pharmaceutical industry. That study showed no benefit from statins. All the pharmaceutical funded trials showed a benefit. However, even for those studies, the benefits are incredibly small.

Since 2000 there have been no positive trials on statins. In the most favorable study from UK “The Heart Protection Study” there is no data showing any benefit for women at all. If there is a positive result the news will trumpet it, but they will not report any negative outcomes. Another study known as 4S by Merck showed a higher fatality rate for women taking statins compared with those who did not take them in the control group.

Lipitor claimed to reduce the risk of heart attack by over 30%, yet the data showed there was no reduction in fatal heart attacks and no reduction in overall mortality.

One study recoded 94% of people taking the drug had adverse effects. 

Dr Kendrick describes himself, not as “anti-statin” but “Anti terrible research that is manipulated and corrupted to sell medications”. 

How much longer will you live if you take the statin? According to the two most positive clinical trials (4S and HPS), amongst secondary prevention (those who are at the very highest risk – because they have already had a heart attack or stroke) after 5 years you can expect to live 6 additional days from taking the statin. So you endure all the side effects for a few extra days?? Is it worth it?

Can you stop taking statins once you have been taking them? According to Dr Kendrick, there is no danger in stopping and there may be plenty of benefit. He suggests stopping for a few weeks and notice if the side effects are reduced or disappear. Start taking the drug again and confirm if the side effect returns.

The claim that cholesterol leads to cardiac disease was a sales pitch for these drugs from the get-go, now a $15 billion market. According to a new BMJ study, “Is LDL cholesterol associated with long-term mortality among primary prevention adults? A retrospective cohort study from a large healthcare system,” even the “bad” version of cholesterol, LDL, is associated with lower mortality risk.

Statins convey no health benefits, but plenty of side effects:

  1. Muscle pain and weakness, including muscle breakdown leading to early mortality in 50%.
  2. Liver damage
  3. Digestive problems
  4. Increased blood sugar levels
  5. Neurological side effects (including dementia)
  6. Increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke
  7. Skin reactions
  8. Fatigue

Extract from the study: “New Study Confirms Higher LDL Levels of ‘Bad’ Cholesterol Are Linked to Reduced Risk of Death in People Who Do Not Suffer from Coronary Disease.”

“A 22-year study published in BMJ Open on 177,000 people found low LDL cholesterol is linked to higher mortality than cardiovascular disease. Researchers say the lowest risk of long-term mortality was detected in the LDL range of 100–189 mg/dL, which is much higher than current recommendations. Cholesterol is produced 80% internally by the organism itself, in the liver, and is necessary for healing damage to the body, for the production of cell membranes, steroid hormones (progesterone, estrogen, testosterone, cortisol), and vitamin D, while it constitutes 40% of the nervous system. The study finds that, preventively, to assess cardiovascular risk, LDL levels are of little importance. More weight should be given to the triglyceride/HDL ratio and to examining the calcium score, which are the most reliable predictive indicators. The results of this study confirm evidence from many similar studies published in recent years and disconnect total mortality from total cholesterol and LDL levels.” https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/14/3/e077949.full.pdf?with-ds=yes

Becky Hastings collects information on health and tries her best to discover and share truth. By God’s grace, through Jesus Christ, I was saved, blessed with a husband of over 40 years, and five precious babies all grown up. I now get to delight as eleven grandchildren grow! Together we can help each other discover a healthy path in this crazy upside down world.

Swimming Aids?

We can learn from the tragic experiences of others. I never knew these devices had such a bad track record. Several of my grandchildren have used them. Praise God they are all learning to swim now.The following information comes from:

Judah Brown Projectn

The puddle jumper. It’s the flotation device moms love. They are cute. They look fun and inviting and they give our kids independence in the water. We think they keep our kids safe, but do they really?

This post is extremely hard for me. I was that mom who put my beautiful 3-year-old baby boy in one of these devices. The packaging told me it would help him stay safe. Other moms told me it would help him stay safe. All I wanted to do was to keep him safe. That’s it. That was my sole reason for buying and using this device.

I put it on him every time we went to water (which was usually a pool).

I learned after my beautiful baby boy drowned that the unintended things he learned while using this device were a major factor in his accident.

This is why…

1) Puddle jumpers automatically put children in a vertical position in the water. They teach a head up and arched and feet down position and that is also known as the drowning position. Puddle jumpers teach children muscle memory for that position so that when they get in water, they will automatically go vertical, whether they have the device on or not. This makes drowning faster.

2) Puddle Jumpers can teach children to bicycle their arms and legs in order to propel through the water. This expends huge amounts of energy and contributes significantly to drowning incidents because it cannot be sustained for very long for young kids. They have the wrong body proportions under the age of 5 to stay in a treading position for more than around 30 seconds before they submerge and begin to drown.

3) Puddle Jumpers can and often do prevent kids from learning to reach their arms out in front of them for any swimming stroke and from putting their heads in the water to help get into a horizontal (swimming and breathing position) in the water. Ask swim instructors and they will tell you that they can spot a puddle jumper kid anywhere and that it takes these kids twice as long to learn to swim on their own because of the poor body positioning that these devices teach the kids.

4) This one applies to ANY flotation device used in pools frequently with young children. ANY flotation device can create a false sense of security/safety for the child. The child thinks they can swim because they have built confidence in the water with the device, using it consistently during swim times. At young ages they don’t know how their own bodies react in the water (without a flotation device on) because they have been wearing them every time they get into a pool. They then don’t make the connection that the device is what is keeping them floating and not themselves.

The way they see it, they have always been able to float and do so with very little effort each time they play in the water, so they should be able to do that every time. They don’t see that it’s the device that is keeping them up and that without it, they can’t swim or float.

So, when the opportunity arises for them to get into water when they aren’t supposed to be in it, when you are momentarily distracted, they are much more likely to do so without the device, thinking they can swim on their own, when they really can’t. That’s when the false sense of confidence can cause a drowning.

70% of all child drownings happen during non swim times, when kids aren’t expected to be in or near the water. That could be when you are getting snacks ready for them or tending to another child or when you are done with swimming for the day and don’t expect them to be near the water anymore.

We have story after story of kids who survived their drownings (talking about not just puddle jumpers but any flotation device) and how they didn’t think they needed it to swim and that’s why they went in without it. From the kid’s own mouths.

5) ANY flotation device can create a false sense of security for adults. Adults tend to not be as vigilant around the water when they put their kids in these devices. So, as an example, during a break when a parent might be attending to another child, their little one may have their device off temporarily and because the parent has trained themselves not to have to be as vigilant, they have a lapse in supervision for a few seconds. In that time, the little one can end up in the pool without the device that holds them up in the water and can drown. Drowning in this age group only takes 20-30 seconds. It’s fast and it’s silent. It doesn’t look like it does on TV.

6) Puddle Jumpers are coast guard approved but you need to know that the coast guard only evaluates and approves devices for use on a boat, in open water. They do not even evaluate ANY devices for use anywhere else, including pools.

Pools are controlled water. Open water is uncontrolled and unexpected things can and do happen there with frequency. This is why anyone who goes to open water should have a life jacket on. But this is not the case with pools.

Pools are where kids should be learning their limits in the water, developing a healthy respect for it, learning to save themselves and then to swim in it, practicing their skills there. That can’t be done when they are always in a device.

My son thought he could swim because I put this device on him during swim times and he learned and adopted all of the points above. He went to the water without his puddle jumper when I looked over at the deep end of the pool to make sure my other kids were doing ok. That’s all the time he needed to sneak back to the water without me and without his device.

And I inadvertently taught him the confidence to do that by always using the device with him and encouraging his independence with it.

I should have taught him what his own body could and couldn’t do in the water. I should have had one on one touch supervision with him in and around the water until he could swim. I should have gotten him into lessons that would teach him what to do if he ever fell into the water on his own, instead of the mommy and me lessons I had him in.

My son drowned. He died. He was only gone from my sight for a minute or two.

It only takes 30 seconds.

Why not puddle jumpers? Because your child’s life is not worth the risk that using these devices can and do pose.

Do you have a puddle jumper or flotation device story? Would you share below?

#dontletthemdrown

#beavoice

#saynotopuddlejumpers