“Immunizations not only do not prevent any infectious diseases, they cause more suffering and more deaths than any other human activity in the entire history of medical intervention.” Viera Scheibner, Ph.D.

In 1985, Viera Scheibner, Ph.D. a retired principle research scientist for the government of Australia, with more than 90 published scientific papers in refereed journals to her credit, created a baby monitor called Cotwatch with her husband, electrochemical engineer Leif Karlsson. CotWatch is a breathing monitor for babies who are diagnosed “at risk” for SIDS, or “Cot Death” as it is known in Australia. Over the next three years, the couple monitored hundreds of babies and studied the event reports that their CotWatch devices produced. By studying the data from these baby monitors and all event reports, to their complete surprise, they discovered a critical period after every routine vaccination where babies were more vulnerable to death. 

“By 1988 we knew that vaccines are killing babies,” said Dr. Scheibner.

Once Dr Scheibner and Leif Karlsson had proven the causal link between vaccines and SIDS, they presented their findings to the medical community for peer review. In a presentation at Templin’s Resort she gave an explanation as to what they discovered:

“Our breathing monitor scientifically established the causal link between vaccines and sudden infant death,” said Dr. Scheibner.

What was the response of the medical community? Dr Scheibner’s findings were completely ignored. With no attempt to verify the results, and no attempt to do further testing, the establishment turned their back on the results Scheibner and Karlsson found.

The bottom line to Dr. Scheibner’s scientifically flawless arguments is that those who are designing and implementing vaccine policy are doing so with the full knowledge that their policies are killing babies. Furthermore, published medical literature shows that vaccines are altering the genetic code of people and causing them to suffer damage to their immune systems which is making them vulnerable to numerous physical and psychological complications. This alteration of DNA has been studied and reported by Sound Choice:

The contaminants found in vaccines and drugs that are manufactured using human fetal cell lines present the perfect storm of contaminants to cause genomic instability. Some childhood vaccines contain very high levels of short human fetal DNA fragments, which gene therapy studies have taught us are the perfect size to insert into our genes. Some childhood vaccines also contain a retroviral contaminant called HERVK, which is in the same family of retroviruses as the one that caused cancer in 4 of 9 boys. http://soundchoice.org/research/

Vaccine advocates cannot debate Dr. Scheibner, nor can they defend their motives because the very scientific journals upon which they depend for support, The Journal of the American Medical Association, the Lancet, and the New England Journal of Medicine have all published reports that support her findings.

If the head of your local health department’s vaccination program were to experience Dr. Scheibner’s lecture and then continue advocating mass vaccination as sound public health policy, there would only be one question left to ask him: Why should you not be prosecuted for conspiracy to commit murder? In the same way, officials making recommendations for the CDC (ACIP) who refuse to honestly investigate the broad range of scientific research on SIDS, aluminum adjuvants, and total body burden of aluminum, need to be held accountable. Their actions, often with clear conflicts of interest, have caused death and serious injuries to countless babies, children, and families over many decades. Even paediatricians who continue to tow the line and follow the recommendations which are geared towards supporting the pharmaceutical industry, are demonstrating wilful ignorance by refusing to ask and answer basic questions on the safety of vaccines.

Dr. Scheibner has written two painstakingly referenced and footnoted books on the subject: “Vaccination: 100 Years of Orthodox Research Shows Vaccinations are a Medical Assault on the Immune System” and “Behavioral Problems in Childhood: The Link to Vaccination”. Both are available on Amazon.

A true scientist seeks to explore all information available — not so that it will support their preconceived perspective, but to find the truth. A true scientist does not criticize and attack those presenting information they disagree with. Science does not ignore or alter studies which do not support the hoped for outcome. Science is about an unbiased examination of facts.

We all have bias. It’s ingrained, but true science seeks to free itself of bias through open respectful dialogue. True science examines previous information in light of new information and designs studies to get answers, not to support their point of view.

Dr Aaby is known to be a scientist who has strongly supported vaccines throughout his career. He and others had questions on the health outcomes of vaccinated children. He designed a retrospective analysis of data collected over the last 30 years in Guinea Bissau and asked honest questions, seeking honest answers. His conclusion gave him pause. He found DTP vaccine “was associated with increased mortality.”  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360569/  This is called an unintended consequence. One can only guess how shocked Dr Aaby was to find his own data demonstrated a conclusion which went against all his previous assumptions about the benefits of vaccines. Yet, not only did he publish this information, he recently published a follow up study with very similar conclusions for slightly older children.  https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00079/full

Dr Chris Exley is another scientist who was forced to change his view on vaccines because of the science he discovered:

“The new evidence strongly suggests that aluminum is entering the brain in ASD [autism spectrum disorders] via pro-inflammatory cells which have become loaded up with aluminum in the blood and/or lymph, much as has been demonstrated for monocytes at injection sites for vaccines including aluminium adjuvants.”   https://www.hippocraticpost.com/infection-disease/aluminium-and-autism/

As J.B. Handley, a parent of a vaccine injured child and an avid researcher of ALL the science, points out:

“Science is a continuum, an emergence of truth through many different studies that often have to be pieced together before the picture becomes clear. And, scientific progress can sometimes move slowly until that moment when an emerging truth presents itself in such a way that it can no longer be denied. In my opinion, Dr. Exley’s study provided the only data missing from an airtight explanation of what happened to my son and so many other children.”   https://jbhandleyblog.com/home/2018/4/1/international2018

We need more truth seeking scientists such as Dr Aaby, Dr Chris Exley, Dr Chris Shaw, Dr Andrew Wakefield, Dr Suzanne Humphries, Dr Judy Mikowits, Dr James Lyons-Weiler,  and 100s of others. All of these individuals began with the perspective that agreed with their training. They assumed vaccines were good and necessary to protect children and keep them healthy. Each one, on a unique path, came to question that stance. When questioning, they sought honest fact based answers. Most were shocked by what they discovered.

So many claim public health is absolutely dependent on a strong vaccine uptake. Is this true? Does society really reap an overall benefit from vaccines? If I could get vaccine promoters to read just thing, this might be it.

Author: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus and truth. As a breastfeeding counselor for over 23 years Becky is devoted to helping parents make wise decisions for the long-term health and wellbeing of their babies. As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety.