HPV vaccines and cancer prevention, science versus activism. “In summary, the optimistic claims that HPV vaccines will prevent cervical cancers and save lives, and that they are extremely safe, rest on assumptions which are misinterpreted and presented to the public as factual evidence. We thus conclude that further reduction of cervical cancers might be best achieved by optimizing cervical screening (which carries no serious health risks) and targeting other factors of the disease rather than by the reliance on vaccines with questionable efficacy and safety profiles.
1. HPV vaccines have not been demonstrated to prevent any cervical cancers so why are they being promoted as cervical cancer vaccines?”
Tomljenovic L, Wilyman J, Vanamee E, Bark T, Shaw CA. HPV vaccines and cancer prevention, science versus activism. Infect Agent Cancer. 2013;8(1):6. Published 2013 Feb 1. doi:10.1186/1750-9378-8-6https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565961/
Are there safe effective alternatives to using the HPV vaccine?
Pap smears have long been utilized to diagnose and treat cervical cancer early and effectively.
Additionally, a team in Mexico has been studying specialized light therapy in treating HPV and has an amazing success rate. Watch the short video below.
What is the main thrust of the current HPV research? How to increase uptake and acceptance of the vaccine. If you do a search for HPV Vaccine in a medical science research engine you get a lot of variations on this theme, such as this one:
Parents’ uptake of human papillomavirus vaccines for their children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5914890/
This 2018 paper’s aim is “To examine factors associated with parents’ uptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines for their children,” focussing on the fact that uptake is not what they want, assumes absolute safety and efficacy of the vaccine, acknowledges no serious widespread adverse events, and seems more aligned to Merck’s objective of earning $5B in revenue by 2025 from worldwide acceptance of this vaccine than to the actual health and wellbeing of the girls and boys it is being pushed on.
There many similar studies basically asking “How can we make them take it?” or “How do we coerce them to believe it’s a good thing?” In fact, in a recent Senate HELP Committee hearing on the topic of measles, one of the panel members said that more research needed to be done on increasing vaccine acceptance. He wasn’t interested in researching the safety of vaccines – just how to make sure greater numbers accept them.
Please research for yourself. Someone is making a lot of money. Read HPV Vaccine on Trial to get a detailed account of the background studies used in studying the vaccine. If you can’t find it on Amazon, be sure to check Barnes and Noble or other booksellers.
Studying the facts and finding the truth can be overwhelming. The reality is that there is a lot of aluminum in the HPV vaccine. The reality is that a lot of children have been harmed significantly from the vaccine. “The fact is however that HPV vaccines have not thus far prevented a single case of cervical cancer (let alone cervical cancer death)” (Tomljenovic et al, cited above) yet it is being promoted to parents on the basis of being cancer prevention.
This is a vaccine to thoroughly investigate. Don’t rush. I’ve published previous posts on HPV/Gardasil vaccine here and here. How any thinking doctor can continue to push this vaccine on young children is beyond my imagination. They must believe the information they received directly from Merck and the CDC. They don’t understand the false foundation, manipulated science, and hidden vaccine injury from this vaccine.
Becky Hastings, avid follower of Jesus Christ, wife, mother, grandmother, health seeker and reporter. Seeking truth can be challenging, and sometimes confusing, but far more rewarding than staying ignorant.
Pingback: HPV Papers: 28 and Counting | Journey Boost
Anyone want to explain how males had abnormal pap smears and cervical dysplasia? Totally impossible but we should accept the rest of the findings as fact regardless? Yeah I dont think so
Perhaps, it was a gender binary or transgendered individual with self reporting of the gender. It is 2019.