Let’s Discuss Liability

Car versus Vaccine

No one makes you buy a car, but when you do, the manufacturer takes responsibility for flaws and recalls defective models at enormous expense. Car manufacturers, by law, must take responsibility for their products. If your vehicle is flawed and you are in an accident you can present a case against them.

You have the right to buy a car or the right to refuse to buy a car. You can investigate the safety record of all car makers.

You also have the right to refuse or to accept a vaccine. Unlike cars, the vaccine manufacturer has been shielded from all liability for harm that may be caused by their product. If you or your child is harmed – or killed – by their vaccine, YOU, as the parent, are the only person with full responsibility. The pharmaceutical companies were granted immunity for their vaccine products in 1986. All vaccines approved by the ACIP and added to the CDC recommended schedule carry no liability for the doctor, manufacturer, or those recommending the vaccine.

Forty four states still allow religious exemptions for your non vaccinated child to attend school. All 50 states allow a medical exemption from vaccines.

If you are forced to accept a vaccine for work or school and are told that a religious exemption is not acceptable, here is a strategy that has worked for many. Provide an indemnity form. Ask the person pushing who is compelling the vaccine to sign the form. The form will state clearly that they agree to accept responsibility for any harm or injury which is a result of the vaccine. This is very important. Those administering the vaccine must understand that because the pharmaceutical company is not liable, they, as the entity pushing the vaccine must accept the liability or YOUR CHILD WILL NOT BE VACCINATED. Stay calm. Just ask for the form to be completed.

No entity can force another to accept unknown substances injected into them without taking responsibility for the consequences. Informed consent should always be the rule when drugs and medical procedures are involved. The first rule of the Nuremberg Code is voluntary consent. Vaccines are drugs. Vaccinations are medical procedures.

Do you trust the guy who makes your car? He cares about safety – because he cares about profit. Lack of safety will reduce his profit. Can you trust the guy who makes the vaccines? He has no reason to be trusted. His profit is guaranteed regardless of the safety. The industry has convinced the public – and politicians – that vaccines are safe and effective. Yet, vaccines have never undergone rigorous scientific testing; no double blind placebo controlled studies to prove safety; and no vaccine combinations have even been studied for safety. Vaccine makers are 100% free from all liability. The gold standard does not apply to vaccines.

EVERY manufacturer of pediatric vaccines: Merck, Sanofi, Glaxo Smith Kline, Novartis – has plead guilty to fraud in the last 3 years. Not for vaccines, but for other drugs they manufacture.

You can get rid of a flawed car, but you can never unvaccinate your precious child.

There are many risks to vaccines. Please make sure you are fully informed.

Compiled by Becky Hastings (with inspiration from a friend), avid follower of Jesus Christ, wife, mother, grandmother, health seeker and reporter. Seeking truth can be challenging, and sometimes confusing, but far more rewarding than staying ignorant.

5 thoughts on “Let’s Discuss Liability

  1. Pingback: Let’s Compare Health… | Journey Boost

  2. And when the vaccines don’t work, they want you to get more of them!! That is like saying you have to take your car back to the mechanic who ruined it the first time. Except there is a slight chance he may be able to actually fix it. Getting more vaccines does not fix anything. Good post as all of yours are!

  3. Couple comments:
    1. I believe pleading guilty to fraud means the vaccine maker knowingly did something wrong. It was not an accidental mistake. Then again, they could have pled down to admitting fraud and the actual charge could have been something even more serious?
    2.Regarding not being able to trust vaccine makers – again, the lawsuit that Robert Kennedy, JR and Del Bigtree just won in court showed the vaccine makers have made no attempt to follow their end of the bargain when the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 was signed as they have not submitted even ONE paper to Congress detailing their continuing research to make vaccines safer.
    3. Do you know if any doctors have signed a form that they are willing to be held liable? It seems I read somewhere that doctors can still be sued if they don’t keep the vaccines at correct temperature or if their employees were to inject in wrong place or mistakenly give 2 doses of same vaccine; is that right?

    • Good point Jean. When the pharmaceutical companies knew they were going to be facing fines, they could easily admit to something lesser than they actually committed. Imagine if the CEO or other high level employees actually had to face personal criminal charges and potential jail time – rather than just corporate fines! Perhaps some change would ensue. As it is they see these fines as just another ‘cost of doing business’. Professor Peter C Gøtzsche’s book, Deadly Medicines and Organised Crime: How Big Pharma Has Corrupted Healthcare, outlines the Mafia tactics of the pharmaceutical industry. His focus is on prescription drugs, especially mind altering drugs, but the same exact principles apply – maybe even moreso – to the vaccine industry.
      Regarding your 3rd point, I don’t know of any doctor who would be willing to sign such a form. The main idea is that by producing such a form, and having them read it, they understand they will now be part of the liability and at the minimum stop pushing vaccines.

      Thanks for your comments. Always appreciated!
      Becky

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.